Peritumoral stroma and systemic inflammatory response in cervical cancer

Summary

Objective: To compare cervical stroma in advanced cervical cancer with the control group; to compare, in the pre-treatment period, hemogram parameters in patients with advanced cervical cancer with the same parameters as the control group; and to verify if there is an association of stromal markers with prognostic factors in cervical cancer. Materials and methods: We prospectively evaluated 16 patients diagnosed with advanced invasive cervical cancer. A control group of 22 patients was used (uterine leiomyoma). Immunohistochemistry was performed to verify the stromal immunostaining of alpha-smooth muscle actin (SMA) and fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP). Immunostainings and hemogram parameters were compared using Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney Test, respectively. Results: Strong FAP immunostaining was more frequent in patients with cervical cancer when compared with patients with leiomyoma (P = 0.0002). Regarding SMA, strong immunostaining was also found more in the group of cancer patients compared to the control group (P < 0.00001). The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) values were higher in the cancer patient group compared to the control group (P = 0.0019). There was no association of the parameters studied with prognostic factors. Conclusions: Strong FAP and SMA immunostaining was found more in patients with cervical cancer when compared to the control group. NLR values were also higher in cervical cancer.

Keywords:

uterine cervical neoplasms – alpha-smooth muscle actin – fibroblast activation protein alpha – blood cell count

Introduction

Currently, cancer is the main public health problem in the world and is among the four main causes of premature death in most countries. The incidence and mortality from this disease have been increasing due to aging, population growth, as well as changes in the distribution and prevalence of risk factors, especially those associated with socioeconomic development [1].

The tumor stroma has several cells, in addition to the extracellular matrix that can suppress the host’s immune responses against tumor cells. Through the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines, metabolic changes and other mechanisms, the tumor stroma provides a complex network of safeguards for tumor proliferation [2].

The tumor microenvironment is composed of a complex network of extracellular matrix and cells such as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), blood vessel associated smooth muscle cells, pericytes, endothelial cells, mesenchymal stem cells and a variety of immune cells. Changes in the homeostasis of this environment contribute to tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis, immune suppression and resistance to treatments [3].

Studies suggest that two stromal markers, alpha-smooth muscle actin (SMA) and fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP), play an important role in the stroma of a malignant ovarian neoplasm. Stronger FAP immunostaining was found in ovarian cancer compared with benign ovarian neoplasms. In ovarian cancer, immunostaining plus FAP was higher in moderately differentiated and undifferentiated ovarian carcinomas compared to well-differentiated tumors, demonstrating that FAP may play a role in the prognostic prognosis. SMA is expressed in smooth muscle cells of the vasculature and it is the most widely used marker for identifying myofibroblasts. In an immunohistochemical study of ovarian neoplasms, detection of SMA alone has not consistently provided significant results [4,5].

The objectives of the study were to compare the cervical stroma in patients with advanced cervical cancer with the control group; to compare, in the pre-treatment period, blood count parameters (platelets, NLR – neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, PLR – platelet-lymphocyte ratio, RDW – red cell distribution width) in patients with advanced cervical cancer (stage ≥ IIB) with the same parameters as the control group; and in cervical cancer, to verify if there is an association of immunostaining of stromal markers with pathological (histological type, histological grade and staging) and systemic (platelets, NLR, PLR and RDW) prognostic factors.

#953783

Materials and methods

We prospectively evaluated 16 patients diagnosed with advanced invasive cervical carcinoma staging ≥ IIB – FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) [6], confirmed by biopsy, attended from 2020 to 2022. Clinical data, oncotic cytology, blood count parameters (neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, RDW) and biopsy data were recorded in a specific database for the study. A control group of 22 patients was used.

The inclusion criterion was women with invasive cervical cancer staging ≥ IIB. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, other diseases that lead to immunosuppression, use of immunosuppressive drugs and relapse.

Data were obtained from the patients’ medical records. All patients with a Pap smear showing invasive cervical carcinoma underwent cervical biopsy. Staging was performed through clinical and imaging exams. Patients with a stage ≥ IIB were selected for the study. The control group consisted of 22 patients who underwent hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma without alterations (neoplasia or dysplasia) in the Pap smear prior to surgery and without cervical involvement of the myoma.

Calculation of the NLR was performed by dividing the absolute number of neutrophils by the absolute number of lymphocytes. The division of platelet count and lymphocyte count resulted in the PLR.

Immunohistochemistry was performed to verify stromal immunostaining of SMA and FAP in cervical cancer and the control group.

Consent was obtained from all patients included in the study and from all patients in the control group.

 

Cervical biopsy collection

Cervical biopsies were stored in formaldehyde and sent to the Special Pathology Department. Biopsy collection is already a routine procedure for the group of patients with cervical cancer. For the control group, the biopsy was performed immediately after the removal of the surgical specimen (uterus), avoiding discomfort for the patient (since a cervical biopsy is not necessary in patients with uterine leiomyoma).

Immunohistochemistry study

Specimens obtained by surgical resection were processed in paraffin and reviewed by an experienced pathologist. We used the streptoavidin-biotin-peroxidase technique. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with the Novolink™ Polymer Detection System (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). The specific primary antibodies used were anti-aSMA and anti-FAP, according to the manufacturer’s indications.

Two observers evaluated the slides. Intensity of immunostaining in the stroma was subjectively assessed using 0 to 3:

• 0 (no staining);
• 1 (weak staining);
• 2 (moderate staining);
• 3 (strong staining).

 

Figures shows the immunostaining of cases (Fig. 1) and controls (Fig. 2).

 

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism software. Results were expressed as medians, minimum and maximum values. The immunostaining of stromal markers was compared between groups using the Fisher’s exact test. The results of blood count parameters were compared between groups using the Mann-Whitney Test. Differences will be considered significant for P < 0.05.

In the immunohistochemical study, the agreement between two observers will be performed using kappa:

• - k < 0.4: weak agreement;
• - 0.4 ≤ k < 0.8: moderate agreement;
• - 0.8 ≤ k < 1.0: strong agreement;
• - k = 1.0: perfect agreement.

Results

The general characteristics and parameters of the blood count of the groups of patients with cervical cancer and uterine leiomyoma are shown in Tab. 1. The histological type, histological grade and staging of the patients in the cervical cancer group are shown in Tab. 2.

The NLR values were higher in the group of cancer patients (median = 4.4; minimum = 2.06; maximum = 47.48) compared to the control group (median = 2.32; minimum = 0.82; maximum = 8.29) (P = 0.0019). Regarding RPL values, these were also higher in the cancer group (median = 200.7; minimum = 123.14; maximum = 748.13) than in the leiomyoma group (median = 164.6; minimum = 78, 99; maximum = 263.33), but at the threshold of significance (P = 0.0675). There was no significant difference in platelet and RDW values when comparing these groups (P = 0.3986 and P = 0.9095, respectively) (Fig. 3).

Strong immunostaining (2/3) by FAP was more frequent in patients with cervical cancer when compared with patients with myoma (control group) (P = 0.0002). Regarding SMA, strong immunostaining (2/3) was also found more in the group of cancer patients compared to the group of patients with myoma (P < 0.00001) (Tab. 3).

NLR values were higher in the group of cancer patients (median = 4.4; minimum = 2.06; maximum = 47.48) compared to the control group (median = 2.32; minimum = 0.82; maximum = 8.29) (P = 0.0019). Regarding RPL values, these were also higher in the cancer group (median = 200.7; minimum = 123.14; maximum = 748.13) than in the leiomyoma group (median = 164.6; minimum = 78.99; maximum = 263.33), but at the threshold of significance (P = 0.0675). There was no significant difference in platelet and RDW values when comparing these groups (P = 0.3986 and P = 0.9095, respectively) (Fig. 3).

There was no significant difference in the evaluation of the two stromal markers in cervical cancer in the study of pathological prognostic factors (staging and histological grade) nor in the study of systemic factors (platelets, NLR, PLR and RDW).

Discussion

Tumor stroma contains distinct prognostic data evidenced by vascular cells and immune cells in the movement of neoplastic progression. FAP and SMA markers were evaluated in cervical cancer, and studies have been carried out showing that fibroblast behavior and characteristics influence therapeutic responses. The presence of immunostaining for SMA in the cancer cell is responsible for creating a permissive environment for tumor progression [7]. There is a strong relationship between the association of the transformation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia into invasive carcinoma [8,9]. This reinforces our result, since in the present study, strong immunostaining for SMA was found more in the group of cancer patients when compared to the group of patients with myoma.

It is known that FAP has a potential therapeutic target, and its present labeling can be used for targeted therapy or imaging [10]. It is highly expressed in reactive stromal fibroblasts in epithelial carcinomas. FAP contributes to neovascularization within tumors, in addition to increasing tumorigenicity [11]. In this study, strong FAP immunostaining occurred more frequently in the group of patients with cervical cancer.

In addition to the degradation of the basement membrane, the invasion of cervical cancer is carried out by the remodeling of the interstitial stroma. Thus, some proteins and fibroblasts play an important role in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer [12]. FAP is an immunohistochemical marker with a potential therapeutic target in several types of gynecological and genitourinary carcinomas, but which did not show much prognostic significance in untreated cervical cancer, as its expression did not correlate with clinical outcomes. However, it has been shown that FAP may have value in targeted therapy of cervical neoplasia [10]. In our study, there was no significant difference in the assessment of the two stromal markers in cervical cancer in the study of pathological prognostic factors (staging and histological grade) or in the study of systemic factors (platelets, NLR, PLR and RDW).

The tumor microenvironment has been receiving more attention in recent years. Various inflammatory cells have a major role in the tumor environment [13]. Inflammation plays an important role in the initiation and progression of many cancers, including cervical cancer. Currently, the correlation between blood factors, easily identified by a blood count, and the prognosis and risk of dissemination in cervical cancer is known. The most studied are NLR, PLR, RDW and the isolated platelet count, which were used in this study. Research showed that in advanced cervical cancer higher values of NLR and PLR were found when compared to early stages [14]. High NLR is associated with lower overall survival and disease-free survival, and can be considered as an independent factor of worse prognosis [14] and is a biomarker to predict the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [15]. Our study corroborates this information, since NLR values were higher in patients with malignant neoplasia than in the control group.

Regarding PLR, it is an independent risk factor for increased lymph node metastases, acting as a prognostic factor, especially if combined with NLR [16]. In the present study, higher values of PLR were also found in patients with neoplasms when compared to the control group, despite being at the limit of significance. Thus, the PLR together with high NLR seem to provide an increased risk for the development of cervical neoplasia. Platelet count and RDW were not relevant in the present study, although the increase in RDW in cervical cancer has already been described [17] including the consideration of thrombocytosis as a pre-treatment prognostic factor [18].

Some limitations also exist in our study. The main limitation is the small sample size of patients. However, despite the limitation, our study was the first in the literature to compare stromal markers and blood count parameters with a control group of patients with uterine leiomyoma, and may be a target for new studies related to carcinogenesis and new treatments for this disease, whose morbimortality still has so much impact, especially in developing countries. In addition, our results may have potential in future studies on the relationship between the stroma and systemic inflammatory response, bearing in mind that the blood count is a simple, inexpensive, and easy-to-collect test.

 

Conclusion

Strong immunostaining (2/3) by FAP and SMA were found more in the group of patients with cervical cancer when compared to the group of patients with myoma. The RNL values were higher in the cancer patient group when compared to the control group. Regarding RPL values, these were also higher in the cancer group than in the leiomyoma group, but at the threshold of significance. There was no significant difference in platelet and RDW values when comparing these groups. There was also no difference in the evaluation of the two stromal markers in cervical cancer in the study of pathological prognostic factors (staging and histological grade) nor in the study of systemic factors (platelets, NLR, PLR and RDW).