#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

The Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity after the Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation


Authors: J. Lešták 1,2;  Š. Pitrová 1;  M. Fůs 1;  M. Žáková 2
Authors place of work: Oční klinika JL FBMI ČVUT Praha 1;  FBMI ČVUT Praha 2
Published in the journal: Čes. a slov. Oftal., 73, 2017, No. 4, p. 127-133
Category: Original Article

Summary

The aim of the study was to evaluate retrospectively selected parameters influencing postoperative near vision in a cohort of pseudophakic eyes of patients with uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and on the basis of the obtained results to determine those parameters which most influenced good uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) following the implantation of a monofocal IOL. In total 122 pseudophakic eyes of 65 patients were observed, in whom both eyes were operated on in 57 cases. The frequency of visual acuity was evaluated for three groups of operated eyes categorised according to the core parameter – axial length of eye (short, average, long). In each group the average parameters were stipulated (age, axial length, keratometry and depth of anterior chamber), as well as relative frequency of uncorrected postoperative near visual acuity on conventionally used reading tables. Examination of near vision was conducted for each eye separately, performed in its horizontal position with the aid of a Zeiss table. The study did not confirm unequivocal dependency of postoperative near vision on the age of the patient, depth of the anterior chamber or on the implanted model of IOL. The presumption of optimal near visual acuity for eyes with an axial length shorter than 23.5 mm was confirmed, in which a weak negative correlation was found between both parameters. By contrast, a medium positive correlation was determined between uncorrected near visual acuity and central optical corneal power in eyes with an axial length of 22.5-23.5 mm.

The study confirmed that higher values of central optical corneal power and an upper limit of axial length of the eye up to 23.5 mm represent a prerequisite for optimal postoperative uncorrected near visual acuity following the implantation of a monofocal IOL.

Key terms:
uncorrected postoperative near visual acuity (UNVA), monofocal IOL, pseudo-accommodation

INTRODUCTION

With regard to the development of models of higher generations, it is possible to calculate reliably the appropriate optical power of an intraocular lens (IOL) in order to attain postoperative distance emmetropia. Visual acuity remains the core criterion for the success of a surgical procedure, and the requirement for comfortable distance and near vision without further correction by eyeglasses has culminated in the development of multifocal and accommodative IOLs. An obstacle in the case of these models is the high financial cost and in many patients observed asthenopic complaints caused by higher order aberrations (9, 8). In some patients with pseudophakia, not only very good uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), but also uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) was determined following the implantation of a monofocal IOL. Theoretically it is possible to presume a significant role of pseudo-accommodation amplitude and the capacity for axial shift of the IOL in these eyes. Among the factors with an influence on postoperative near vision are age, astigmatism, pupil size, axial length of eye, axial shift of IOL, central optical corneal power and aberration (2).

The aim of the study was to evaluate retrospectively selected parameters influencing postoperative near vision in a cohort of pseudophakic eyes of patients with UDVA, and on the basis of the obtained results to determine those parameters which most influenced good UNVA following the implantation of a monofocal IOL.

METHOD AND COHORT

The study included patients operated on for cataract with implantation of a monofocal IOL. The operation was performed by a single surgeon (ŠP) using an identical technique (phakoemulsification by entry incision of 2.2 mm with prediction of induced astigmatism 0.50 D), the evaluation period was within the range of 4 to 130 months after surgery. UDVA in the operated eyes attained a minimum value of 0.8. The SRK/T formula was used for calculation of the optical power of the IOL for emmetropia. In total 122 operated eyes of 65 patients were observed, in which both eyes were operated on in 57 patients.

The observed preoperative parameters covered average corneal keratometry (K) (autokeratometer NIDEK KM 500) and axial length of the eye (AL) (OA 1000 – Tomey). The evaluated postoperative parameters covered central optical corneal power (KC) (Anterior Segment Analyser Orbscan II – Technolas), depth of anterior chamber (AC) (OcuScan – Alcon), age of patient (AGE), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) and with correction by the given optical power (nCORR). In order to determine the values of distance vision, ETDRS optotypes were used for each eye separately. Examination of near vision was performed for each eye separately in its horizontal position with the aid of a Zeiss table. The obtained results in the above-stated preoperative and postoperative parameters were evaluated in order to determine their influence on UNVA following the implantation of a monofocal IOL.

RESULTS

All the initial data is presented in table 1. With regard to the nature of the data, its statistical interpretation was implemented by means of relative frequency and the correlation coefficient between the individual parameters. The most significant factor in optimal postoperative UNVA was axial length of the eye. For the purposes of the study, the given cohort was categorised into three groups. Eyes with an axial length shorter than 22.5 mm were classified into the group designated as (potentially) hypermetropic, the category of average length was represented by values within the range of 22.5 to 23.5 mm, and we categorised axial lengths greater than 23.5 mm as the (potentially) myopic group. The group with average axial length (52 eyes) was the most widely represented, followed by the group with short length (38 eyes) and the least represented was the group of myopic eyes (32 eyes).

Tab. 1. Initial data of observed cohort of operated eyes
Initial data of observed cohort of operated eyes

SEX sex, YoB year of birth, K (D) average keratometry value, KC (D) central optical corneal power, AL (mm) axial length of eye, AC (mm) depth of anterior chamber, UDVA uncorrected distance visual acuity, UNVA uncorrected near visual acuity, nCORR (D) value of correction for near vision of 1.0

The average values of the observed parameters were stipulated for the entire cohort and the individual categories, including standard deviations (table 2). The average age of the cohort of 122 eyes in a total of 65 patients was determined at 69.98 ± 7.64 years. The average age of all three groups was practically identical. According to expectation, the average values of keratometry according to the individual groups were indirectly proportional to axial length, and average depth of the anterior chamber increased together with the axial length of the eye.

Tab. 2. Average values of individual categories and entire cohort
Average values of individual categories and entire cohort
AL – axial length of eye, K – keratometry value, AC – depth of anterior chamber

The most frequently implanted IOL model was SN60AT (in 71 eyes = 58.2%), followed by MA50BM (20 eyes = 23.8%), SN60WF (16 eyes = 13.1%) and a toric IOL of the SN6ATx range was implanted in only 6 eyes (4.9%) (table 3). No dependency was found between the individual models and UNVA. Nevertheless, in all eyes with UNVA of 0.8 and better, an IOL of the SA60AT model was always implanted.

Tab. 3. Frequency of implanted models of IOL
Frequency of implanted models of IOL

With regard to the method and selection of patients for the study, a relative frequency of UDVA values equal to 1.0 and better was determined in 97.54% of eyes, in which a value of 0.8 was determined in the remaining 2.46%. The relative frequency of postoperative UNVA in the entire cohort virtually corresponded to an even distribution (graph 1). In total 70.49% of eyes in the cohort attained satisfactory values of UNVA (0.5 and better), in 30.33% of eyes the value of vision was higher (0.6 and better), in 9.84% the UNVA value was 0.8 and better, and in 16.39% of eyes UNVA reached 1.0 (table 4). According to graph 2, the groups with short and average axial length form the most numerous section of the cohort, in which better than average (0.5) near visual acuity was observed. The dependency of axial length of the eye on UNVA is illustrated in graph 3.

Graph 1. Distribution of relative frequency of UNVA
Distribution of relative frequency of UNVA

Graph 2. Distribution of relative frequency of eyes according to UNVA depending on axial length of eye
Distribution of relative frequency of eyes according to UNVA depending on axial length of eye

Graph 3. Dependency of axial length of eye (AL) on UNVA
Dependency of axial length of eye (AL) on UNVA

Tab. 4. Dependency of axial length of eye (AL) on UNVA
Dependency of axial length of eye (AL) on UNVA
UDVA – uncorrected distance visual acuity, UNVA – uncorrected near visual acuity

In all eyes optimum vision was achieved by means of addition for near vision. The recommended correction for visual acuity up to 1.0 for near vision did not exceed 1.5 D in 46.72% of eyes, and correction in a maximum amount of 1.0 D was required in 15.57% of eyes.

According to the values of the correlation coefficient between two matrices of values, we differentiate the following: weak (<0.3), medium (0.3 - 0.8) and strong (>0.8) linear dependency (correlation). A weak positive coefficient of correlation was established between UNVA and KC for the entire cohort (0.23), but for the group with average axial length a medium positive correlation (0.46) was determined in these two parameters. In the case of the parameter of postoperative depth of the anterior chamber, no relevant correlation with UNVA was determined, only for high AL a weak positive correlation was determined (0.27).  The mutual relationships of the parameters described by means of the correlation coefficients are summarized in table 5.

Tab. 5. Relative frequency of UNVA related to number of eyes in individual groups
Relative frequency of UNVA related to number of eyes in individual groups
UDVA - uncorrected distance visual acuity, UNVA – uncorrected near visual acuity

Tab. 6. Mutual relationships of parameters described by means of correlation coefficients
Mutual relationships of parameters described by means of correlation coefficients
UNVA – uncorrected near visual acuity, AL – axial length of eye, K – keratometry value, AC – depth of anterior chamber

DISCUSSION

Patients following cataract surgery or extraction of a clear lens with implantation of a multifocal intraocular lens have high expectations and demands for visual functions and the refractive result (11, 12, 13, 14). Postoperative emmetropia plays a significant role in these types of implants, and from the perspective of the patient is the main criterion of success of the operation. However, despite attaining optimal UDVA and UNVA, some patients are not satisfied with the result due to a reduction in the quality of vision which is manifested in blurring, photophobia, halo effects, diplopia etc. (8, 9).

In certain patients with pseudophakia, very good uncorrected vision not only to distance but also near vision (UNVA) was determined following the implantation of a monofocal IOL. The mechanism of manifest accommodation or pseudo-accommodation following implantation of monofocal IOLs with an influence on UNVA is not sufficiently well known, and a number of factors share in this phenomenon (2). According to clinical experiences, an indirect dependency of UNVA on the axial length of the eye is presumed. A theoretical study (Nawa (1)) of calculations for average values of the model of the eye defines possible pseudo-accommodation in short eyes (calculated for AL = 21 mm) to 2.3 D, upon a presumption of a shift of the IOL by 1 mm. In myopic eyes (AL = 27 mm), pseudo-accommodation of 0.8 D was calculated for an identical model of the eye. Lim (2) also confirmed in a study of 84 eyes with an implanted model SN60WF that the factor of short axial length, together with a narrow pupil, has a positive effect on attaining good UNVA following the implantation of a monofocal IOL. Following the categorisation of our cohort of patients according to AL, it was also demonstrated that the dominant majority of the 30.33% of eyes in which UNVA of 0.6 and better was recorded had an axial length shorter or equal to a value of 23.5 mm. Upon uncorrected near visual acuity of 0.8, an axial length of up to 22.5 mm predominated.

In patients following cataract surgery, not only predicted distance visual acuity but also uncorrected near visual acuity is important. Summary studies (10) assessing uncorrected near visual acuity in the case of monofocal intraocular lenses state values from 0.3log MAR (decimal 0.5) for the type AMO, for the type SA60AT up to 0.6log MAR (0.32). In our study, no influence of the design of individual models of IOL was unequivocally proven. The presence of the model SN60AT in all eyes with UNVA of 0.8 and better was evidently caused by its significantly high frequency of implantation.

No correlation between age and UNVA value was demonstrated in our cohort. However, Hayashi's study (3) confirms patient age as a negative factor of postoperative amplitude of pseudo-accommodation (correlation coefficient equal to -0.49). However, in his study he includes also patients aged under 40 years, whereas in the cohort of patients we present the youngest patient was operated on at the age of 49 years, and the average age of the entire cohort was 69.98 ± 7.64 years. A relevant evaluation of the dependency of postoperative pseudo-accommodation on age would require a greater age dispersion of the patients operated on. According to Nanavaty's study (4), a significant role influencing postoperative near visual acuity upon implantation of monofocal IOLs is played only by corneal astigmatism (against the rule), which increases the probability of pseudo-accommodation by up to ten times. In our cohort, patients without significant values of residual astigmatism and the necessity of its correction were included.

The mutual relationships of the parameters described by means of the correlation coefficients attest to a low negative correlation of UNVA and AL (-0.20), although in short eyes of less than 22.5 mm there is a medium negative correlation (-0.36), as well as a low correlation of the depth of the anterior chamber with axial length of the eye, and a medium correlation of central optical power of the cornea for average length of the eye. The correlation of postoperative depth of the anterior chamber paradoxically has a medium positive value (0.27), but within the framework of the entire cohort of patients, it is not of a more significant character.

CONCLUSION

No significant influence of patient age, postoperative depth of anterior chamber and implanted model of IOL on optimal postoperative UNVA following the implantation of a monofocal IOL was unequivocally confirmed by our study. A value of 23.5 mm was confirmed as the maximum axial length for a presumption of optimal postoperative UNVA. With a reduction of axial length (under 22.5 mm), there already exists a medium negative correlation with postoperative UNVA. A weak value of correlation between UNVA and KC was determined, in which a medium positive correlation of both parameters was found for the category of average AL.

The authors of the study declare that no conflict of interest exists in the compilation, theme and subsequent publication of this professional communication, and that it is not supported by any pharmaceuticals company.

Doc. MUDr. Jan Lešták, CSc., MBA, FEBO

Oční klinika JL, Fakulta biomedicínského inženýrství ČVUT Praha

V Hůrkách 10 158 00 Praha 5 - Nové Butovice

E mail: lestak@seznam.cz                                                                      


Zdroje

1. Nawa, Yioshiaky et al.: Accommodation obtained per 1.0 mm forward movement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 29(11); 2003: 2069–2072.

2. Lim, Dong Hui, Jong Chul Han, Myung Hun Kim, Eui-Sang Chung, Tae-Young Chung: Factors Affecting Near Vision After Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 29(3); 2013: 200–204.

3. Hayashi, Ken, Hideyuki Hayashi, Fuminori Nakao, Fumihiko Hayashi.: Aging changes in apparent accommodation in eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 135(4); 2003 432–436.

4. Nanavaty, Mayank A., Abhay R. Vasavada, Anil S. Patel, Shetal M. Raj, Tejas H. Desai: Analysis of patients with good uncorrected distance and near vision after monofocal intraocular lens implantation. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 32(7); 2006: 1091–1097.

5. Leyland, M, Edward Pringle E.: Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [online]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1996 [cit. 2017-07-12]. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub 2. Dostupné z: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub2.

6. MESCI, Cem, Hasan Hasbi ERBIL, Ali OLGUN a Sevil Ari YAYLALI. Visual Performances with Monofocal, Accommodating, and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Patients With Unilateral Cataract. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 150(5); 2010: 609–618.

7. Heatley, Catherine J., David J. Spalton, Jo Hancox, Anupma Kumar, John Marshall: Fellow Eye Comparison Between the 1CU Accommodative Intraocular Lens and the Acrysof MA30 Monofocal Intraocular Lens. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 140(2); 2005: 207.e1–207.e8.

8. De Vries, Niels E., Carroll A.B. Webers, Wouter R.H., Touwslager, Noel J.C. Bauer, John De Brabander, Tos T. Berendschot, Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts: Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 37(5); 2011, 859–865.

9. Tassignon MJ, Bartholomeeusen E, Rozema JJ, Jongenelen S, Mathysen DG: Feasibility of multifocal intra-ocular lens exchange and conversion to the bag-in the-lens implantation. Acta Opohthalmol, 92; 2014: 256–259.

10. Cochener B, Lafuma A, Khoshnood B, Courouve L, Berdeaux G: Comparison of outcome with multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis. Clinical Ophthalmology, 5; 2011: 45–56.

11. Marešová K, Mlčák P, Vláčil O: Výsledky operací katarakty s implantací Acrysof Restor SN6AD3. Čes a Slov. Oftal, 66 (1); 2010: 26–28.

12. Urminský J, Rozsíval P, Feuermannová A, Lorencová V, Jirásková N: Implantace multifokální nitrooční čočky. Čes a Slov Oftal, 60 (1); 2004: 30–36.

13. Brožková M, Filipec M, Filipová L, Holubová A, Hlinomazová Z: Výsledky implantace trifokální torické čočky u pacientů s kataraktou. Čes a Slov Oftal, 72 (3); 2016: 58–64.

14. Veliká V, Hejsek L, Raiskup F: Klinické výsledky implantace dvou typů multifokální rotačně asymetrické nitrooční čočky. Čes a Slov Oftal, 73 (1); 2017: 3–12.

Štítky
Maxillofacial surgery Ophthalmology
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#