Collagen in combination with the acid form of carboxymethylcellulose in the form of a nonwoven textile as a modern wound dressing – formulation, preparation and evaluation

Česká verzia

Authors: Kateřina Tenorová; Ruta Masteiková; Jana Jarábková; David Vetchý; Jurga Bernatonien
Published in the journal: Čes. slov. Farm., 2020; 69, 163-171
Category: Původní práce

Summary

The acid form of carboxymethylcellulose (HCMC) is less known than its sodium salt (NaCMC). However, it is commonly used as a sorbent for chromatographic columns and has a number of valuable properties for its use in wound care. As a wound dressing in the form of hydrofibers, it is already commercially available on our market. Collagen, the most abundant protein in the human body, fulfils both a building and a physiological function in the body, also has an irreplaceable place in the treatment of wounds. It is important in the process of wound healing and is used in wound therapy in various forms. It exhibits very good film-forming properties as well, but the collagen-based films themselves have weaker mechanical resistance, which limits their successful application to a wound. Therefore, the effort is to combine collagen with other materials in order to ensure better mechanical and application properties even in the wet state. The aim of this experiment was to create a wound dressing by combining a collagen film with HCMC in the form of a nonwoven textile. The resulting dressing had satisfactory organoleptic, physicochemical (pH, absorbency) and application properties for its use in wound therapy. The textile HCMC formed a mechanical support for collagen, which enabled its saving during the dressing preparation and partly served as an absorbent layer.

Zdroje

1. Peate I., Glencross W. Wound Care at a Glance. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell 2015.

2. Rajendran S. Advanced Textiles for Wound Care (The Textile Institute Book Series), 2^nded. Woodhead Publishing 2018.

3. Boateng J. S., Matthews K. H., Stevens H. N. E., Eccleston G. M. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008; 97(8), 2892–2923.

4. Dhivyaa S., Padmab V. V., Santhinia E. Wound dressings – a review. BioMedicine 2015; 5(4), 24–28.

5. Sweeney I. R., Miraftab M., Collyer G. A critical review of modern and emerging absorbent dressings used to treat exuding wounds. Int. Wound J. 2012; 9(6), 601–612.

6. Bell D., Hyam D. Choosing an appropriate dressing for chronic wounds. Prescriber 2007; 18(11), 65–70.

7. Okur M. E., Karantas I. D., et al. Recent trends on wound management: New therapeutic choices based on polymeric carriers. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2020.

8. Yao K., Bae L., Yew W. P. Post-operative wound management. Aust. Fam. Physician 2013; 42(12), 867–870.

9. Naude L. Exudate management: Putting the patient first. Prof. Nurs. Today 2008; 12(5), 29–32.

10. Mogoșanu G. D., Grumezescu A. M. Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing. Int. J. Pharm. 2014; 463(2), 127–136.

11. Gaspar-Pintiliescu A., Stanciuc A. M., Craciunescu O. Natural composite dressings based on collagen, gelatin and plant bioactive compounds for wound healing: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019; 138, 854–865.

12. Paul E. J., Padmapriya B. A pragmatic review on the property, role and significance of polymers in treating diabetic foot ulcer. Mater. Today: Proceedings 2020; 23, 91–99.

13. Naseri-Nosar M., Ziora Z. M. Wound dressings from naturally-occurring polymers: A review on homopolysaccharide-based composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018; 189, 379–398.

14. Calori I. R., Braga G., De Jesus P. C. C., Bi H., Tedesco A. C. Polymer scaffolds as drug delivery systems. Eur. Polym. 2020; 129, 109621.

15. Li X., Ma M., Ahn D. U., Huang X. Preparation and characterization of novel eggshell membrane-chitosan blend films for potential wound-care dressing: From waste to medicinal products. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019; 123, 477–484.

16. Jaganathan G., Manivannan K., Lakshmanan S., Sithique M. A. Fabrication and characterization of Artocarpus heterophyllus waste derived lignin added chitosan biocomposites for wound dressing application. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2018; 10, 27–32.

17. Varaprasad K., Jayaramudu T., Kanikireddy V., Toro C., Sadiku E. R. Alginate-based composite materials for wound dressing application: A mini review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020; 236, 116025.

18. Hamedi H., Moradi S., Hudson S. M., Tonelli A. E. Chitosan based hydrogels and their applications for drug delivery in wound dressings: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018; 199, 445–460.

19. Fleck C. A., Simman R. Modern Collagen Wound Dressings: Function and Purpose. J. Am. Col. Certif. Wound Spec. 2010; 2(3), 50–54.

20. Sopuch T., Drahovzalová R., Rýdl J. et al. Celulózové materiály v ošetřování ran. Hojení ran 2013; 7(2), 14–20.

21. Bakhsheshi-Rad H. R., Ismail A. F., Aziz M., Akbari M., Hadisi Z., Omidi M., Chen X. Development of the PVA/CS nanofibers containing silk protein sericin as a wound dressing: In vitro and in vivo assessment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020; 149, 513–521.

22. Farokhi M., Mottaghitalab F., Fatahi Y., Khademhosseini A., Kaplan D. L. Overview of Silk Fibroin Use in Wound Dressings. Trends Biotechnol. 2018; 36(9), 907–922.

23. Gupta B., Agarwal R., Alam M. S. Textile-based smart wound dressings. Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. 2010; 35, 174–187.

24. Benchabane A. Carboxymethyl Cellulose: Rheological and Pipe Flow Properties. RAPSCI 2018; 5(5), 95–103.

25. Tufan M., Uraz E., Tosun C., Gercel H. Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose film from pistachio shells. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Tech. 2016; 4(1), 153–155.

26. Sunardi N., Febriani M., Junaidi A. B. Preparation of carboxymethylcellulose produced from purun tikus (Eleocharis dulcis). AIP Conference Proceedings 2017; 1868, 1–8.

27. Kulikowska A., Wasiak I., Ciach T. Carboxymethyl cellulose oxidation to form aldehyde groups. Biomed. Eng. 2013; 4(2), 11–18.

28. Araújo D. M. L., Galera P. D. Ocular lubricants: what is the best choice? Ciência Rural. 2016; 46(11), 2055–2063.

29. Stephen-Haynes J., Callaghan R., Stephens C. Evaluating the performance of a new carboxymethylcellulose dressing in the community setting. Br. J. Nurs. 2017; 26(6), S36–S41.

30. Ramli N. A., Wong T. W. Sodium carboxymethylcellulose scaffolds and their physicochemical effects on partial thickness wound healing. Int. J. Pharm. 2011; 403(1–2), 73–82.

31. Vinklárková L., Masteiková R., Vetchý D., Doležel P., Bernatoniené J. Formulation of novel layered sodium carboxymethylcellulose film wound dressings with ibuprofen for alleviating wound pain. BioMed Res. Int. 2015; 2015, 1–11.

32. Lopez C. G., Rogers S. E., Colby R. H., Graham P., Cabral J. T. Structure of sodium carboxymethylcellulose aqueous solutions: A SANS and rheology study. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2015; 53(7), 492–501.

33. Liu X., Zheng Ch., Luo X., Wang X., Jiang H. Recent advances of collagen-based biomaterials: Multi-hierarchical structure, modification and biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2019; 99, 1509–1522.

34. Brett D. A review of collagen and collagen-based wound dressings. Wounds 2008; 20(12), 347–356.

35. Salvatore L., Gallo N., Natali M. L., et al. Marine collagen and its derivatives: Versatile and sustainable bio-resources for healthcare. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020; 113, 110963.

36. Romero-Ortuno R., Kenny R. A., McManus R. Collagens and elastin genetic variations and their potential role in aging-related diseases and longevity in humans. Exp. Gerontol. 2020; 129, 110781.

37. Kirkness M. W. H., Lehmann K., Forde N. R. Mechanics and structural stability of the collagen triple helix. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2019; 53, 98–105.

38. Abou Nell E. A., Bozec L., Knowles J. C., Syed O., Mudera V., Day R., Hyun J. K. Collagen – Emerging collagen based therapies hit the patient. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013; 65(4), 429–456.

39. Hochstein A. O., Bhatia A. Collagen: its role in wound healing. Podiatry management 2014; 8, 103–110.

40. Harding K. G., Rangaraj A., Leaper D. Role of collagen in wound management. Wounds 2011; 7(2), 54–60.

41. Yang H., Guo X., Chen X., Shu Z. Preparation and characterization of collagen food packaging film. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2014; 6(6), 740–745.

42. Chen X., Zhou L., Xu H., et al. The structure and properties of natural sheep casing and artificial films prepared from natural collagen with various crosslinking treatments. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019; 135, 959–968.

43. Český lékopis 2017. Praha: Grada Publishing 2017; 4904 s.

44. Masteiková R., Vinklárková L., Muselík J., Vetchý D., Bernatoniené J., Sopuch T. Vliv stupně substituce na nasákavost kyselé formy karboxymethylcelulosy v podobě netkané textilie. Čes. slov. Farm. 2013; 62(2), 89–94.

45. Ocak B. Development of the mechanical and barrier properties of collagen hydrolysate/carboxymethyl cellulose films by using SiO2 nanoparticles. PAJES 2019; 25(3), 320–324.

46. Tenorová K., Masteiková R., Kovárová N., Kostelanská K., Přikryl J., Vetchý D., Bernatoniené J. Příprava a hodnocení dvouvrstvých filmů na bázi kolagenu a karboxymethylcelulosy za účelem terapie ran. Čes. slov. Farm. 2019; 68, 229–236.

47. Metcalf D. G., Haalboom M., Bowler P. G., Gamerith C., Sigl E., Heinzle A., Burnet M. W. M. Elevated wound fluid pH correlates with increased risk of wound infection. Wound Medicine 2019; 26(1), 1–5.