MONITORING THE OCCURRENCE OF THE AXIAL ORGAN DEFECTS IN DENTAL HYGIENE STUDENTS

Česká verzia

Authors: Wioletta Mikuľáková; Jozef Živčák; Anna Eliašová; Eva Kovaľová; Eva Labunová; Lucia Kendrová
Authors place of work: Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, Fakulta zdravotníckych odborov
Published in the journal: Lékař a technika - Clinician and Technology No. 3, 2015, 45, 69-74
Category: Původní práce

Summary

Objective:
The aim of the research was to evaluate changes in the curvature of the spine in the basic position in the sagittal and frontal plane in dental hygiene students using SpinalMouse^®, as well as comparing the quality of posture with a group of physiotherapy students.

File:
The surveyed sample consisted of 120 Prešov University students, aged 21 to 34 years.

Methods:
Measurements were made using the SpinalMouse^® device. The percentage representation of changes in the basic shape of the spine in the sagittal and in the frontal plane in the various spine sections were calculated from the acquired data within the entire file.

Results:
The main problems were diagnosed in the frontal plane in the lumbar section of the spine. Pathological curvature without emphasis on the assessment of the curvature degree was found in more than 90% of the examined persons.

Conclusion:
The research highlights the negative changes in the parameters of the spinal shape in the examination sample of students. In order to prevent many health risks, attention should be paid to the method of teaching healthy habits within the work of dentists or dental hygienists.

Keywords:
Spinal Mouse^®, curvature of the spine, dental hygiene students, ergonomics of work.

Zdroje

[1] Richter, P. Spouštěcí body a funkční svalové řetězce v osteopatii a manuální terapii. 2011, Praha: PRAGMA, 237 s.

[2] Véle, F. Kineziologie. Přehled klinické kineziologie a patokine-ziologie pro diagnostiku a terapii poruch pohybové soustavy. 2. vyd. 2006, Praha: Triton, 375 s.

[3] Vojta,V., Peters, A. Vojtův princip. Praha: Grada Publisching. 2010, 200 s.

[4] Lichota, M., Plandowska, M., Mil, P. The shape of anterior – posterior curvatures of the spine in athletes practising selected sports. In Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, 2011, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 112-116.

[5] Wazzan, KA., et al. Back & Neck Problems among Dentists and Dental Auxiliaries. In The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 2001, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 17-30.

[6] McKenzie, R. Léčíme si záda sami. Praha: Agentura Grafa spol. s. r. o. 2005, s. 82.

[7] Hertling, D., Kessler, RM. Management of common Musculoskeletal disorders – Physical therapy principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams&Wilkins, 2006.

[8] Wunderlich, M., et al. Rückenschmerzen und Wirbelsӓulenbelastungen – Befragung des zahnmedizinischen Personals in der Bundeswehr. In Wehrmedizinische Monatsschrift., 2009, vol. 53, p. 230–234.

[9] Davis, KG., Marras, WS. The effects of motion on trunk biomechanics. In Clinical biomechanics, 2000, vol. 15, no. 10, 2000, pp. 703-717.

[10] Wilke, H. et al. Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data-a data set for the validation of models. In Clinical biomechanics, 2001, vol. 16, suppl.1, p. 111-126.

[11] Wunderlich, M. Eger, T., Rüther, T. et al. Analysis of spine loads in dentistry – impact of an altered sitting position of the dentist. In Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 2010, vol. 3, no. 7, p. 664-671.

[12] Kociová, K., Mikuľáková, W. Kineziologická analýza axiálne-ho systému človeka pomocou zariadenia Spinal Mouse. In Molisa 8, 2011, Prešov, Grafotlač, s.r.o, Prešov, 2011. s. 59-66.

[13] Laguna, M. Spinal Mouse [online]. 2001. [cit.2013.01.11] Dostupné na internete: <http://www.flare.ch/aditus/main.html>.

[14] Ripani, M., Cesare, A., Giombini, A., Agnello, L., Fagnani, F. et al. Spinal curvature: comparison of frontal measurements with the Spinal Mouse and radiographic assessment. In Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2008, vol. 48, no. 4, p. 488-94.

[15] Mannion, AF., Knecht, K., Balaban, G., Dvorak, J., Grob, D. A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature. In European spine journal, 2004, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 122-36.

[16] Dohi, E. SpinalMouse^® [online]. 2013. [cit.2013.02.08] Dostupné na internete: <http://spinalmouse.ro/en/contact/>.

[17] Lenková R. Správne držanie tela, ciele a úlohy kompenzačných cvičení. In Zdravá škola, Zborník prác zo 6. vedeckej konferencie. Prešov: Metodické centrum, 2000.

[18] Labunová, E. a kol. Pohybová aktivita a jej vplyv na posturálny systém mládeže. In Fyzioterapia a hudobné aktivity, rehabi-litácia, regenerácia a zdravie, Recenzovaný zborník vedeckých prác. Trenčin, 2015, s. 71-80.

[19] Kratenová J. et al. Výskyt vadného držení těla u dětí školního věku v ČR [online]. [cit. 2011.09.15.] 2005. Výsledky grantu IGA MZ CR NJ/7386 – 3. Dostupné na internete: http://www.ftvs.cuni.cz/eknihy/sborniky/2005-11-16/prispevky/sdeleni/8-Kratenova.htm

[20] Mikuľáková, w. et al. 2012. Vybrané parametre hodnotiace kvalitu posturálneho systému zubných lekárov, dentálnych hygienikov a študentov vysokých škôl. In Recenzovaný zborník [elektronický zdroj]: 7. Medzinárodný týždeň dentálnej hygieny a prevencie Slovensko 7.-9. 05. 2012: 1. Medzinárodná vedecká konferencia k projektu "Ergonómia práce a jej vplyv na rast kvality života a spoločenskej praxe", 10.-11. 5. 2012. Prešov: Akcent Print Pavol Šidelský, 2012. s. 49.

[21] Łukomska - Szymańska, M. a kol. Ocena stylu pracy lekarza stomatologa ergonomicznych w warunkach. In Protetyka stomatologiczna [online]. 2012. vol. LXII, no. 1, [cit.07.09.2012], p. 58 - 66. Dostupné na WWW: <http://www.prot.stomat.net/upload/articles/14/1391.pdf>.

[22] Kovalová, E. a kol. Porovnanie úrovne informovanosti študentov zubného lekárstva a dentálnej hygieny v oblasti následkov nesprávnej ergonómie práce. In Stomatológ, 2014, vol. XXIV, no. 2, s. 46-49.

[23] Martin, J. Hand Tool Use and Design Principles. In: The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2009, vol. 131, no. 6, p. 785-795.

[24] Unthank, M. Office Design. In: The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2009, vol. 131, no. 6, p. 763-769.

[25] Fredekind, R., Cuny. E. Instruments Used In Dentistry. Ergonomics and the Dental Care Worker. In: American Journal of Public Health, 2008, vol. 88, no. 7, p. 1142-1151.

[26] Gomolka, K. Dental Ergonomics: Instrumental Ideas for Reducing Hand and Eye Strain. In: Dispatch, 2009, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 52-57.

[27] Oberg, T, Karsznia, A., Sandosjo. L. Workload, Fatigue, and Pause Patterns in Clinical Dental Hygiene. In: Journal of Dental Hygiene, 2009, vol. 69, no. 5, p. 223-229.

[28] Pollack, R. The Ergo Factor: The Most Common Equipment and Design Flaws and How to Avoid Them. In: Dentistry Today. 2009, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 112-121.

[29] Rucker, L., Beattie C., McGregor. C. Declination Angle and Its Role in Selecting Surgical Telescopes. In: The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2009, vol. 130, no. 7, p. 1096-110.