EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE KINEMATICS
Pain-provoking disorders of the lumbar spine affect most of adult population and nearly everyone suffers from some of them during their lifetime. A common symptom of diseases, injuries or inevitable changes in the area of lumbar spine is known as the Low Back Pain (LBP). A chronic form of the LBP, called the Low Back Pain syndrome, is mostly caused by degenerative changes of intervertebral discs of the lowest intervertebral joints. The work was focused on in vitro analysis of the porcine lumbar spine kinematics. Two last neighbouring intervertebral joints without active tissue, L4/5 and L5/6, were used. The total number of fifteen cadaveric samples of porcine lumbar spine was involved. A unique loading mechanism was designed and constructed for the purposes of this study. Samples were loaded by flexion/extension movement within the physiological range of motion of ± 5°, in a quasistatic mode. The recording and analysing of the lumbar spine kinematics was realized by the motion capture camera system (Qualisys AB, Göteborg, Sweden). The results showed that the so-called instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR), or the corresponding instantaneous centre of rotation (ICR), was an adequate objective parameter for the assessment of the lumbar spine kinematics. Its position was comparable across all samples and situated very close to the spinal canal. For the purposes of this work, an altered artificial disc of a ball-and-socket type (ProSpon, Ltd., Kladno, Czech Republic) was used to study the kinematics of two neighbouring joints after the disc replacement in the area of a caudally situated one. The results of this comparative analysis showed a significant influence of the artificial disc on the kinematics of both, caudally situated joint, where the disc was implanted, and the adjacent one.
Keywords:
low back pain, kinematics, intervertebral joint, instantaneous centre of rotation (ICR), artificial disc
Autoři:
Lubos Tomsovsky 1; Petr Kubovy 2; Martin Otahal 1
Působiště autorů:
Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Kladno, Czech Republic
1; Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Prague, Czech Republic
2
Vyšlo v časopise:
Lékař a technika - Clinician and Technology No. 2, 2017, 47, 49-55
Kategorie:
Původní práce
Souhrn
Pain-provoking disorders of the lumbar spine affect most of adult population and nearly everyone suffers from some of them during their lifetime. A common symptom of diseases, injuries or inevitable changes in the area of lumbar spine is known as the Low Back Pain (LBP). A chronic form of the LBP, called the Low Back Pain syndrome, is mostly caused by degenerative changes of intervertebral discs of the lowest intervertebral joints. The work was focused on in vitro analysis of the porcine lumbar spine kinematics. Two last neighbouring intervertebral joints without active tissue, L4/5 and L5/6, were used. The total number of fifteen cadaveric samples of porcine lumbar spine was involved. A unique loading mechanism was designed and constructed for the purposes of this study. Samples were loaded by flexion/extension movement within the physiological range of motion of ± 5°, in a quasistatic mode. The recording and analysing of the lumbar spine kinematics was realized by the motion capture camera system (Qualisys AB, Göteborg, Sweden). The results showed that the so-called instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR), or the corresponding instantaneous centre of rotation (ICR), was an adequate objective parameter for the assessment of the lumbar spine kinematics. Its position was comparable across all samples and situated very close to the spinal canal. For the purposes of this work, an altered artificial disc of a ball-and-socket type (ProSpon, Ltd., Kladno, Czech Republic) was used to study the kinematics of two neighbouring joints after the disc replacement in the area of a caudally situated one. The results of this comparative analysis showed a significant influence of the artificial disc on the kinematics of both, caudally situated joint, where the disc was implanted, and the adjacent one.
Keywords:
low back pain, kinematics, intervertebral joint, instantaneous centre of rotation (ICR), artificial disc
Zdroje
[1] Herkowitz, H., N., Dvorak, J., Bell, G., R., Nordin, M., Grob, D.: The Lumbar Spine. The: Official Publication of the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, 3rd Edition. Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004, p. 976. ISBN 0781742978.
[2] Palecek, T., Lipina R.: Bolesti bederni patere degenerativniho puvodu – Low Back Pain syndrom. Interni medicina pro praxi, 2004, vol. 3, p. 115–118. ISSN 1214-8687.
[3] Shiri, R., Karppinen, J., Leino-Arjas, P., Solovieva, S., Viikari-Juntura, E.: The Association Between Obesity and Low Back Pain: A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2009, vol. 171, no. 2, p. 135–154. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp356. ISSN 0002-9262.
[4] Borenstein, D., G.: Chronic Low Back Pain. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, 1996, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 439–456. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-857X(05)70281-7. ISSN 0889857x.
[5] Meucci, R., D., Fassa, A., G., Faria, N., M., X.: Prevalence of chronic low back pain: systematic review. Revista de Saúde Pública, 2015, vol. 49, p. 1–10. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-8910.
2015049005874. ISSN 1518-8787.
[6] Bogduk, N.: Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum, 4th Edition. Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone, 2005, p. 250. ISBN 0443101191.
[7] Schwarzer, A., C., Aprill, CH., N., Derby, R., Fortin, J., Kine, G., Bogduk, N.: The prevalence and clinical features of internal disc disruption in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine, 1995, vol. 20, no. 17, p. 1878–1883.
[8] Punt, M., Visser, V.M., Van Rhijn, L.W., Kurtz, S.M., Antonis, J., Schurink, G.W.H., Van Ooij, A.: Complications and reoperations of the SB Charité lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. European Spine Journal, 2007, vol. 17, no. 1,
p. 36–43. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0506-8.
[9] Van Ooij, A., Oner, F.C., Verbout, A.J.: Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with SB Charité disc. Journal of spinal disorders & techniques, 2003, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 369-383.
[10] Otahal, M.: Pocitacova a experimentalni analyza kinematiky patere. Praha, 2012. Disertacni prace. Ceske vysoke uceni Technicke v Praze. Fakulta strojni.
[11] Adams, M.A., Burton, K., Dolan, P., Bogduk, N.: The biomechanics of back pain, 2nd Edition. 2006, Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 0443100683.
[12] Wachovski, M.M., Mansour, M., Lee, C., Ackenhausen, A., Spiering, S., Fanghänel, J., Dumont, C., Kubein-Meesenburg, D., Nägerl, H.: How do spinal segments move?. Journal of biomechanics, 2009, vol. 42, no. 14, p. 2286–2293. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.055.
[13] Park, K.: Assessment of movement distribution in the lumbar spine using the instantaneous axis of rotation. Journal of mechanical science and technology, 2014, vol. 28, no. 12, p. 5063–5067. DOI: 10.1007/s12206-014-1127-x.
[14] Keefe, D.F., O’Brien, T.M., Baier, D.B., Gatesy, S.M., Brainerd, E.L., Laidlaw, D.H.: Exploratory visualization of animal kinematics using instantaneous helical axes. Computer graphics forum, 2008, vol. 27, no. 3, p. 863–870. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01218.x.
[15] Hirt, M., Beran, M., Datko, M., Hejna, P., Chrastina, J., Janik, M., Komarekova, I., Krajsa, J., Novak, Z., Riha, I., Straka, L., Safr, M., Toupalik, P., Vlckova, A., Vojtisek, T., Votava, M., Zeleny, M.: Tupa poraneni v soudnim lekarstvi. 1.vyd. Grada Publishing, 2011, p. 192. ISBN 978-80-247-4194-9.
[16] Varlotta, G.P., Lefkowitz, T.R., Schweitzer, M., Errico, T.J., Spivak, J., Bendo, J.A., Rybak, L.: The lumbar facet joint: a review of current knowledge: part 1: anatomy, biomechanics, and grading. Skeletal Radiology, 2011, vol. 40, no. 1, p. 13–23. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-010-0983-4.
[17] Pearcy, M.J., Portek, I., Shepherd, J.: Three-dimensional x-ray analysis of normal movement in the lumbar spine. Spine, 1984, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 294–297. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198404000-00013.
[18] Twomey, L.T., Taylor, R.J.: Sagittal movements of the human lumbar vertebral column: a quantitative study of the role of the posterior vertebral elements. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1983, vol. 64, no. 7, p. 322–325.
[19] Li, G., Wang, S., Passias, P., Xia, Q., Li, G., Wood, K.: Segmental in vivo vertebral motion during functional human lumbar spine activities. European spine journal, 2009, vol. 18, no. 7, p. 1013–1021. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0936-6.
[20] Kapandji, I.A.: The physiology of the joints: the trunk and the vertebral column, volume 3, 2nd edition (Trunk & Vertebral column). Churchill Livingstone, 1974, p. 256. ISBN 0443012091.
[21] Busscher, I., Ploegmakers, J.J.W., Verkerke, G.J., Veldhuizen, A.G.: Comparative anatomical dimensions of the complete human and porcine spine. European spine journal, 2010, vol. 19, no. 7, p. 1104–1114. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1326-9.
[22] Aziz, H.N., Galbusera, F., Bellini, C.M., Mineo, G.V., Addis, A., Pietrabissa, R., Brayda-Bruno, M.: Porcine models in spinal research: calibration and comparative finite element analysis of various configurations during flexion-extension. Comparative medicine, 2008, vol. 58, no. 2, p. 174–179.
[23] Robertson, G., Caldwell, G., Hamill, J., Kamen, G., Whittlesey, S.: Research methods in biomechanics, 2nd edition. Human Kinetics, 2013, p. 440. ISBN 0736093400.
[24] Tomsovsky, L.: Experimentalni analyza kinematiky meziobratloveho skloubeni lumbalni patere. Kladno, 2015. Diplomova prace. Ceske Vysoke Uceni Technicke v Praze. Fakulta biomedicinskeho inzenyrstvi.
Štítky
BiomedicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Lékař a technika
2017 Číslo 2
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- /GD-TRACKER/ A SOFTWARE FOR BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER PERMEABILITY ASSESSMENT
- PERISTALTIC FLOW OF LITHOGENIC BILE IN THE VATERI’S PAPILLA AS NON-NEWTONIAN FLUID IN THE FINITE-LENGTH TUBE: ANALYTICAL AND NUMERICAL RESULTS FOR REFLUX STUDY AND OPTIMIZATION
- RESPIRATORY SOUNDS AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION IN ASTHMA DIAGNOSIS
- MEASUREMENT OF THE VALUES OF RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS AROUND THE HEAD OF ADOLESCENTS