Unintentional miRNA Ablation Is a Risk Factor in Gene Knockout Studies: A Short Report
One of the most powerful techniques for studying the function of a gene is to disrupt the expression of that gene using genetic engineering strategies such as targeted recombination or viral integration of gene trap cassettes. The tremendous utility of these tools was recognized this year with the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to Capecchi, Evans, and Smithies for their pioneering work in targeted recombination mutagenesis in mammals. Another noteworthy discovery made nearly a decade ago was the identification of a novel class of non-coding genes called microRNAs. MicroRNAs are among the largest known classes of regulatory elements with more than 1000 predicted to exist in the mouse genome. Over 50% of known microRNAs are located within introns of coding genes. Given that currently about half of the genes in mouse have been knocked out, we investigated the possibility that intronic microRNAs may have been coincidentally deleted or disrupted in some of these mouse models. We searched published murine knockout studies and gene trap embryonic stem cell line databases for cases where a microRNA was located within or near the manipulated genomic loci, finding almost 200 cases where microRNA expression may have been disrupted along with another gene. Our results draw attention to the need for careful planning in future knockout studies to minimize the unintentional disruption of microRNAs. These data also raise the possibility that many knockout studies may need to be reexamined to determine if loss of a microRNA contributes to the phenotypic consequences attributed to loss of a protein-encoding gene.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Unintentional miRNA Ablation Is a Risk Factor in Gene Knockout Studies: A Short Report. PLoS Genet 4(2): e34. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0040034
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0040034
Souhrn
One of the most powerful techniques for studying the function of a gene is to disrupt the expression of that gene using genetic engineering strategies such as targeted recombination or viral integration of gene trap cassettes. The tremendous utility of these tools was recognized this year with the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to Capecchi, Evans, and Smithies for their pioneering work in targeted recombination mutagenesis in mammals. Another noteworthy discovery made nearly a decade ago was the identification of a novel class of non-coding genes called microRNAs. MicroRNAs are among the largest known classes of regulatory elements with more than 1000 predicted to exist in the mouse genome. Over 50% of known microRNAs are located within introns of coding genes. Given that currently about half of the genes in mouse have been knocked out, we investigated the possibility that intronic microRNAs may have been coincidentally deleted or disrupted in some of these mouse models. We searched published murine knockout studies and gene trap embryonic stem cell line databases for cases where a microRNA was located within or near the manipulated genomic loci, finding almost 200 cases where microRNA expression may have been disrupted along with another gene. Our results draw attention to the need for careful planning in future knockout studies to minimize the unintentional disruption of microRNAs. These data also raise the possibility that many knockout studies may need to be reexamined to determine if loss of a microRNA contributes to the phenotypic consequences attributed to loss of a protein-encoding gene.
Zdroje
1. Griffiths-JonesSGrocockRJvan DongenSBatemanAEnrightAJ
2006
miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature.
Nucleic Acids Res
34
D140
D144
2. BerezikovEGoryevVvan de BeltJWienholdsEPlasterkRH
2005
Phylogenetic shadowing and computational identification of human microRNA genes.
Cell
120
21
24
3. NordASChangPJConklinBRCoxAVHarperCA
2006
The International Gene Trap Consortium Website: a portal to all publicly available gene trap cell lines in mouse.
Nucleic Acids Res
34
D642
D648
4. EppigJTBultCJKadinJARichardsonJEBlakeJAand the members of the Mouse Genome Database Group
2005
The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): from genes to mice—a community resource for mouse biology.
Nucleic Acids Res
33
D471
D475
5. LiuJZhangLWangDShenHJiangM
2003
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, kidney agenesis and cardiac defects associated with Slit3-deficiency in mice.
Mech Dev
120
1059
1070
6. RodriguezAGriffiths-JonesSAshurstJLBradleyA
2004
Identification of mammalian microRNA host genes and transcription units.
Genome Res
14
1902
1910
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2008 Číslo 2
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Unintentional miRNA Ablation Is a Risk Factor in Gene Knockout Studies: A Short Report
- Ready for Her Close-Up: An Interview with Elaine Strass
- The Evolution of Spinnable Cotton Fiber Entailed Prolonged Development and a Novel Metabolism