How To Perform Meaningful Estimates of Genetic Effects
Although the genotype-phenotype map plays a central role both in Quantitative and Evolutionary Genetics, the formalization of a completely general and satisfactory model of genetic effects, particularly accounting for epistasis, remains a theoretical challenge. Here, we use a two-locus genetic system in simulated populations with epistasis to show the convenience of using a recently developed model, NOIA, to perform estimates of genetic effects and the decomposition of the genetic variance that are orthogonal even under deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg proportions. We develop the theory for how to use this model in interval mapping of quantitative trait loci using Halley-Knott regressions, and we analyze a real data set to illustrate the advantage of using this approach in practice. In this example, we show that departures from the Hardy-Weinberg proportions that are expected by sampling alone substantially alter the orthogonal estimates of genetic effects when other statistical models, like F2 or G2A, are used instead of NOIA. Finally, for the first time from real data, we provide estimates of functional genetic effects as sets of effects of natural allele substitutions in a particular genotype, which enriches the debate on the interpretation of genetic effects as implemented both in functional and in statistical models. We also discuss further implementations leading to a completely general genotype-phenotype map.
Vyšlo v časopise:
How To Perform Meaningful Estimates of Genetic Effects. PLoS Genet 4(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000062
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000062
Souhrn
Although the genotype-phenotype map plays a central role both in Quantitative and Evolutionary Genetics, the formalization of a completely general and satisfactory model of genetic effects, particularly accounting for epistasis, remains a theoretical challenge. Here, we use a two-locus genetic system in simulated populations with epistasis to show the convenience of using a recently developed model, NOIA, to perform estimates of genetic effects and the decomposition of the genetic variance that are orthogonal even under deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg proportions. We develop the theory for how to use this model in interval mapping of quantitative trait loci using Halley-Knott regressions, and we analyze a real data set to illustrate the advantage of using this approach in practice. In this example, we show that departures from the Hardy-Weinberg proportions that are expected by sampling alone substantially alter the orthogonal estimates of genetic effects when other statistical models, like F2 or G2A, are used instead of NOIA. Finally, for the first time from real data, we provide estimates of functional genetic effects as sets of effects of natural allele substitutions in a particular genotype, which enriches the debate on the interpretation of genetic effects as implemented both in functional and in statistical models. We also discuss further implementations leading to a completely general genotype-phenotype map.
Zdroje
1. CarlborgÖHaleyCS 2004 Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nat Rev Genet 5 618 625
2. HansenTF 2006 The evolution of genetic architecture. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 37 123 157
3. LynchMWalshB 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits Sunderland Sinauer
4. LanderESBotsteinD 1989 Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121 185 199
5. JansenRC 1993 Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics 135 205 211
6. KaoCHZengZBTeasdaleRD 1999 Multiple interval mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 152 1203 1216
7. ZengZB 1993 Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90 10972 10976
8. ZengZB 1994 Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136 1457 1468
9. HaleyCSKnottSA 1992 A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69 315 324
10. MartínezOCurnowRN 1992 estimating the locations and the sizes of the effects of quantitative trait loci using flanking markers. Theor Appl Genet 85 480 488
11. FalconerDSMacKayTFC 1996 Quantitative Genetics Harlow Prentice Hall
12. Van Der WeenJH 1959 Tests of non-allelic interaction and linkage for quantitative characters in generations derived from two diploid pure lines. Genetica 30 201 232
13. CockerhamCC 1954 An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics 39 859 882
14. FisherRA 1918 The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans Roy Soc Edinburgh 52 339 433
15. KempthorneO 1954 The correlation between relatives in a random mating population. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 143 102 113
16. Álvarez-CastroJMCarlborgÖ 2007 A unified model for functional and statistical epistasis and its application in quantitative trait loci analysis. Genetics 176 1151 1167
17. KaoCHZengZB 2002 Modeling epistasis of quantitative trait loci using Cockerham's model. Genetics 160 1243 1261
18. YangR-C 2004 Epistasis of quantitative trait loci under different gene action models. Genetics 167 1493 1505
19. ZengZBWangTZouW 2005 Modeling quantitative trait Loci and interpretation of models. Genetics 169 1711 1725
20. WangTZengZB 2006 Models and partition of variance for quantitative trait loci with epistasis and linkage disequilibrium. BMC Genet 7 9
21. CarlborgÖKerjeSSchutzKJacobssonLJensenP 2003 A global search reveals epistatic interaction between QTL for early growth in the chicken. Genome Res 13 413 421
22. HansenTFWagnerGP 2001 Modeling genetic architecture: a multilinear theory of gene interaction. Theor Popul Biol 59 61 86
23. BartonNHTurelliM 2004 Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis. Evolution 58 2111 2132
24. TurelliMBartonNH 2006 Will population bottlenecks and multilocus epistasis increase additive genetic variance? Evolution 60 1763 1776
25. FeenstraBSkovgaardIMBromanKW 2006 Mapping quantitative trait loci by an extension of the Haley-Knott regression method using estimating equations. Genetics 173 2269 2282
26. KaoCH 2000 On the differences between maximum likelihood and regression interval mapping in the analysis of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 156 855 865
27. XuS 1995 A comment on the simple regression method for interval mapping. Genetics 141 1657 1659
28. MaoYLondonNRMaLDvorkinDDaY 2006 Detection of SNP epistasis effects of quantitative traits using an extended Kempthorne model. Physiol Genomics 28 46 52
29. HaleyCSKnottSAElsenJM 1994 Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares. Genetics 136 1195 1207
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2008 Číslo 5
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Zebrafish VEGF Receptors: A Guideline to Nomenclature
- The Inexorable Spread of a Newly Arisen Neo-Y Chromosome
- How To Perform Meaningful Estimates of Genetic Effects