On the Trail of Linked Selection

1. Elyashiv E, Sattath S, Hu TT, Strustovsky A, McVicker G, Andolfatto P, et al. A genomic map of the effects of linked selection in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 12(8): e1006130.

2. Smith JM, Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974;23: 23–35.

3. Aguade M, Miyashita N, Langley CH. Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989;122: 607–615. 17246506

4. Begun DJ, Aquadro CF. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992;356: 519–520. 1560824

5. Charlesworth B, Morgan MT, Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993;134: 1289–1303. 8375663

6. Charlesworth B. Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1996;68: 131–149. 8940902

7. Stephan W. Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365: 1245–1253. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0278 20308100

8. Cutter AD, Payseur BA. Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14: 262–274. doi: 10.1038/nrg3425 23478346

9. Braverman JM, Hudson RR, Kaplan NL, Langley CH, Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995;140: 783–796. 7498754

10. Innan H, Stephan W. Distinguishing the hitchhiking and background selection models. Genetics. 2003;165: 2307–2312. 14704207

11. Lohmueller KE, Albrechtsen A, Li Y, Kim SY, Korneliussen T, Vinckenbosch N, et al. Natural selection affects multiple aspects of genetic variation at putatively neutral sites across the human genome. PLoS Genet. 2011;7: e1002326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002326 22022285

12. Andolfatto P. Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Res. 2007;17: 1755–1762. 17989248

13. Macpherson JM, Sella G, Davis JC, Petrov DA. Genomewide spatial correspondence between nonsynonymous divergence and neutral polymorphism reveals extensive adaptation in Drosophila. Genetics. 2007;177: 2083–2099. 18073425

14. Sattath S, Elyashiv E, Kolodny O, Rinott Y, Sella G. Pervasive adaptive protein evolution apparent in diversity patterns around amino acid substitutions in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Genet. 2011;7: e1001302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001302 21347283

15. Schrider DR, Houle D, Lynch M, Hahn MW. Rates and genomic consequences of spontaneous mutational events in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2013;194: 937–954. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.151670 23733788

16. Kim Y, Stephan W. Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation. Genetics. 2000;155: 1415–1427. 10880499

17. McVicker G, Gordon D, Davis C, Green P. Widespread genomic signatures of natural selection in hominid evolution. PLoS Genet. 2009;5: e1000471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000471 19424416

18. Pritchard JK, Di Rienzo A. Adaptation–not by sweeps alone. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11: 665–667. doi: 10.1038/nrg2880 20838407

19. Field Y, Boyle EA, Telis N, Gao Z, Gaulton KJ, Golan D, et al. Detection of human adaptation during the past 2,000 years [Internet]. bioRxiv. 2016. p. 052084. doi: 10.1101/052084

20. Hernandez RD, Kelley JL, Elyashiv E, Melton SC, Auton A, McVean G, et al. Classic selective sweeps were rare in recent human evolution. Science. 2011;331: 920–924. doi: 10.1126/science.1198878 21330547

21. Halligan DL, Kousathanas A, Ness RW, Harr B, Eöry L, Keane TM, et al. Contributions of protein-coding and regulatory change to adaptive molecular evolution in murid rodents. PLoS Genet. 2013;9: e1003995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003995 24339797

22. Williamson RJ, Josephs EB, Platts AE, Hazzouri KM, Haudry A, Blanchette M, et al. Evidence for widespread positive and negative selection in coding and conserved noncoding regions of Capsella grandiflora. PLoS Genet. 2014;10: e1004622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004622 25255320

23. Beissinger TM, Wang L, Crosby K, Durvasula A, Hufford MB, Ross-Ibarra J. Recent demography drives changes in linked selection across the maize genome. Nat Plants. 2016;2: 16084. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.84 27294617

24. Enard D, Messer PW, Petrov DA. Genome-wide signals of positive selection in human evolution. Genome Res. 2014;24: 885–895. doi: 10.1101/gr.164822.113 24619126

25. Corbett-Detig RB, Hartl DL, Sackton TB. Natural Selection Constrains Neutral Diversity across A Wide Range of Species. PLoS Biol. 2015;13: e1002112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002112 25859758

26. Pennings PS, Hermisson J. Soft Sweeps II—Molecular Population Genetics of Adaptation from Recurrent Mutation or Migration. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23: 1076–1084. 16520336

27. Barton N. Understanding adaptation in large populations. PLoS Genet. 2010;6: e1000987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000987 20585547

28. Charlesworth D, Wright SI. Breeding systems and genome evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001;11: 685–690. 11682314

29. Muller HJ. THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE. Mutat Res. 1964;106: 2–9. 14195748

30. Arunkumar R, Ness RW, Wright SI, Barrett SCH. The evolution of selfing is accompanied by reduced efficacy of selection and purging of deleterious mutations. Genetics. 2015;199: 817–829. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.172809 25552275

31. Hartfield M, Glémin S. Hitchhiking of deleterious alleles and the cost of adaptation in partially selfing species. Genetics. 2014;196: 281–293. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.158196 24240529

32. Kamran-Disfani A, Agrawal AF. Selfing, adaptation and background selection in finite populations. J Evol Biol. 2014;27: 1360–1371. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12343 24601989

33. Coop G. Does linked selection explain the narrow range of genetic diversity across species? [Internet]. bioRxiv. 2016. p. 042598. doi: 10.1101/042598