Static and dynamic tests for management of volumotherapy
Authors:
Káňová Marcela 1; Ševčík Pavel 1,2
Authors place of work:
Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny FN Ostrava
1; Katedra intenzivní medicíny a forenzních oborů, Lékařská fakulta Ostravské univerzity
2
Published in the journal:
Anest. intenziv. Med., 25, 2014, č. 2, s. 107-116
Category:
Intensive Care Medicine - Review Article
Summary
The clinical determination of the intravascular volume can be extremely difficult in critically ill patients. Fluid therapy is the first step in the resuscitation of hemodynamically unstable patients. Both underresuscitation and overresuscitation are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The resuscitation of the critically ill patient therefore requires an accurate assessment of the patients’ intravascular volume status (cardiac preload) and the ability to predict the hemodynamic response after a fluid challenge (volume responsiveness). Only about half of the critically ill patients exhibit volume responsiveness – defined as the ability to increase stroke volume in response to fluid challenge. Traditional methods of determining preload (static parameters as cardiac filling pressures including the central venous pressure and the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure) have been used to guide fluid management. But now it is known, they are inaccurate and unable to predict fluid responsiveness. Dynamic parameters based on respiratory variations in venous return and subsequently stroke volume, use heart-lung interaction during mechanical ventilation to assess fluid responsiveness and are highly predictive. Especially the pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and the systolic pressure variation have high sensitivity and specificity in optimization of preload.
Keywords:
intravascular volume status – preload – volume responsiveness – static parameters – dynamic parameters – heart-lung interaction
Zdroje
1. Marik, P., Monnet, X., Teboul, J. L. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy: Review. Annals of Intensive Care, 2011, 1, 1, p. 1–9.
2. Michard, F., Teboul, J. L. Using heart-lung interactions toassess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit. Care., 2000, 4, p. 282–289.
3. Marik, P. Hemodynamic Parameters to Guide Fluid Therapy: Trasfusion Alternatives in Transfusion Medicine. 2010, 11, 3, p. 102–112.
4. Rivers, E., Nguyen, B., Havstad, S., Ressler, J., Muzzin, A., Knoblich, B., Peterson, E., Tomlanovich, M. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.N. Engl. J. Med., 2001, 345, 19, p. 1368–1377.
5. Calvin, J. E., Driedger, A. A., Sibbald, W. J. The hemodynamic effect of rapid fluid infusion in critically ill patiens. Surgery, 1981, 90, p. 61–76.
6. Reuse, C., Vincent, J. L., Pinsky, M. Measurements of right ventricular volumes during fluid challenge. Chest, 1990, 98, p. 1450–1454.
7. Diebel, L., Wilson, R. F., Heins, J., Larky, H. Enddiastolic volume versus pulmonary artery wedge pressure in evaluating cardiac preload in trauma patiens. J. Trauma, 1994, 37, p. 950–955.
8. Wagner, J. G., Leatherman, J. W. Right-ventricular end-diastolic volume as a predictor of the hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge. Chest, 1998, 113, p. 1048–1054.
9. Tavernier, B., Makhotine, O., Lebuffe, G., Dupot, J., Scherpereel, P. Systolic Pressure Variations as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sespis-induced hypotension Anesthesiology, 1998, 89, p. 1313–1321.
10. Tousignant, C. P., Walsh, F., Mazer, C. D. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patiens. Critical Care and Trauma, Anesth. Analg., 2000, 90, p. 351–355.
11. Michard, F., Boussat, S., Chemla, D., Anguel, N., Mercat, A., Lecarpentier, Y., Richard, Ch., Pinsky, M. R., Teboul, J. L. Relation between Respiratory Changes in Arterial Pulse Pressure and Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Patients with Acute Circulatory Failure. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med., 2000, 162, p. 134–138.
12. The ARDSNet Group. Comparison of two fluid- management strategies in acute lung Indry. N. Engl. J. Med., 2006, 354, p. 2564–2575.
13. Murphy, C. V., Schramm, G. E., Doherty, J. A., Reichley, R. M.,Gajic, O., Afessa, B. The importance of fluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock. Chest, 2009, 136, p. 102–109.
14. Boyd, J. H., Forbes, J., Nakada, T., Walley, K. R., Russell, J. A.Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure increase mortality. Crit. Care. Med., 2011, 39, 2, p. 1–7.
15. Vincent, J. L., Sakr, Y., Sprung, Ch., Ranieri, M., Reinhart, K., Gerlach, H., Moreno, R., Carlet, J., Gall, J. R., Payen, D. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit. Care Med., 2006, 34, 2, p. 344–353.
16. Marik, P., Baram, M. Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit. Crit. Care. Clin., 23, 2007, p. 383–400.
17. Pinsky, M. R., Payen, D. Funtional hemodynamic monitoring: Review. Critical Care, 2005, 9, 6, p. 566–572.
18. Pinsky, M. R. Assessment of indices of preload and volume responsiveness. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2005, 11, p. 235–239.
19. Osman, D., Ridel, Ch., Ray, P., Monnet, X., Anguel, N., Richard, Ch., Teboul, J. L. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit. Care Med., 2007, 35, 1, p. 1–5.
20. Michard, F., Teboul, J. L. Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in ICU Patients, A Critical Analysis of the Evidence: Critical Care Review. Chest, 2002, 121, 6, p. 2000–2008.
21. Teboul, J.L., Monnet, X. Detecting volume responsiveness and unresponsiveness in intensive care unit patients: two different problems, only one solution: Commentary. Critical Care, 2009, 13, p. 175–176.
22. Shujaat, A., Bajwa, A. A. Optimalization of Preload in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Review article. Critical Care Research and Practice, 2012, article ID 761051, p. 1–14.
23. Marik, P., Baram, M., Vahid, B. Does the central venous pres-sure predict fluid responsiveness? A systemic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest, 2008, 134, 1, p. 172–178.
24. Nouira, S., Elatrous, S., Dimassi, S., Besbes, L., Boukef, R., Mohamed, B., Abroug, F. Effect of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit. Care. Med., 2005, 33, 10, p. 2339–2343.
25. Kumar, A., Anel, R., Bunnell, E., Habet, K., Zanotti, S., Marshall, S., Neumann, A., Ali, A., Cheang, M., Kavinsky, C., Parrillo, J. E. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit. Care. Med., 2004, 32, p. 691–699.
26. Pinsky, M. R. Heart-Lung interactions. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2007, 13, p. 528–531.
27. Marik, P., Cavallazzi, R., Vasu, T., Hirani, A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patiens: A systematic review of the literature. Crit. Care. Med., 2009, 37, 9, p. 2642–2647.
28. Baker, D., Heenen, S., Piagnerelli, M., Koch, M.,Vincent, J. L. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med., 2005, 31, p. 517–523.
29. Reuter, D., Felbinger, T., Schmidt, Ch., Kilger, E., Goedje, O., Lamm, P., Goetz, A. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med., 2002, 28, p. 392–398.
30. Monnet, X., Teboul, J. L., Richard, Ch. Cardiopulmonary interactions in patiens with heart failure. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2007, 13, p. 6–11.
31. Mahjoub, Y., Pila, C., Friggeri, A., Zogheib, E., Lobjoie, E., Tinturier, F., Galy, C., Slama, M., Dupont, H. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients, false-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventrikle. Critical Care Medicine, 2009, 37, 9, p. 2570–2575.
32. Sakka, S. G., Hellmann, A. M., Reinhart, K. Do fluid admini-stration and reduction in norepinephrine dose improve global and splanchnic haemodynamics? British Journal of Anesthesia, 2000, 84, 6, p. 758–762.
33. Monnet, X., Teboul, J. L. Passive leg raising: Clinical commentary. Intensive Care Med., 2008, 34, p. 659–663.
34. Cavallaro, F., Sandroni, C., Marano, C., Torre, G., Mannocci, A.,Waure, Ch., Bello, G., Maviglia, R., Antonelli, M. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid ressponsiveness: Systemic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med., 2010, 36, p. 1475–1483.
35. Vincent, J. L., Rhodes, A., Perel, A., Martin, G. S., Rocca, G. D., Vallet, B., Pinsky, M. R., Hofer, Ch. K., Teboul, J. L., Boode, W. P., Scolletta, S., Baron, A. V., Backer, D., Walley, K., Maggiorini, M., Singer, M. Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring – a consensus of 16. Critical Care, 2011, 15, p. 229–236.
Štítky
Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Inten Intensive Care MedicineČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
2014 Číslo 2
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Static and dynamic tests for management of volumotherapy
- Current practice in obstetric anaesthesia IV. – Anaesthesia complications in caesarean section
- Methods of extracorporeal oxygenation and C2 removal primarily for lung support
- Fast-track is not only an inoffensive anaesthesia