#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer – a Retrospective Study


Authors: M. Tkáčová 1,2;  B. Belohorská 1,2;  K. Ševčíková 1,2;  L. Heľpianska 1;  D. Ondruš 1;  M. Ondrušová 3;  S. Špánik 1,2
Authors place of work: I. onkologická klinika LF UK, Bratislava, Slovenská republika 1;  Interná- onkologická klinika OÚSA, Bratislava, Slovenská republika 2;  Ústav experimentálnej onkológie SAV, Bratislava, Slovenská republika 3
Published in the journal: Klin Onkol 2010; 23(2): 115-123
Category: Original Articles

Summary

Backgrounds:
Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer is not standardized. Pre-clinical tests have confirmed the synergistic effect of gemcitabine and platinum, which can break through drug resistance to platinum. Therefore, efficacy of a combined gemcitabine and platinum-based regimen can be expected not only in therapy platinum-sensitive but also in platinum-resistant disease. Surgery – so-called secondary (eventually tertiary) cytoreductive surgery, should be considered in recurrent disease before planning the chemotherapy.

Patients and methods:
This is a retrospective analysis of 58 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with a gemcitabine and platinum-based regimen (GP) as the second or third-line chemotherapy. Some of the patients underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery before starting the systemic treatment. The aim of the study was to detect the response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival in the whole group of patients and in subgroups with platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant disease. Another aim was to detect the correlation between secondary cytoreductive surgery and the efficacy of chemotherapy.

Results:
Systemic treatment (GP) has helped to achieve a response rate of 53.5%, with time to progression 10 months and overall survival 23.5 months. A better response rate, progression free survival and overall survival were achieved in the group of patients with platinum-sensitive disease compared to patients with platinum-resistant disease, but this difference was not statistically significant. 20 patients underwent effective secondary cytoreductive surgery before the systemic treatment. Patients who underwent effective secondary cytoreductive surgery had a statistically better response rate (RR: 80% vs 39.5%), longer progression-free survival (PFS: 13.5 m vs 9 m, p = 0.006) and longer overall survival (OS: 40 m vs 16.9 m, p = 0.006) when compared to patients without secondary cytoreductive surgery.

Conclusion:
We have confirmed the efficacy of a gemcitabine and platinum-based regimen in the therapy of recurrent ovarian cancer, in both platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant disease. An important prognostic factor in the whole group of patients was the realization of effective secondary cytoreductive surgery.

Key words:
recurrent ovarian cancer – gemcitabine – carboplatin – cisplatin – surgical treatment


Zdroje

1. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J et al (eds). Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Vol. VIII. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publication 2002; 155.

2. Gertig D, Hunter D. Ovarian cancer. In: Adami HO, Hunter D, Trichopoulos D (eds). Textbook of cancer epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press 2002: 378– 399.

3. Safaei Diba C, Pleško I, Obšitniková A et al. Incidencia zhubných nádorov v Slovenskej republike 2005. Národný onkologický register SR. NCZI 2009.

4. Zatonski W, Smans M, Tyczynski J et al (eds). Atlas of cancer mortality in Central Europe. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publication 1996; 134: 86– 89.

5. Leitao MM, Chi DS. Surgical management of recurrent ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol 2009; 36(2): 106– 109.

6. Relapsed/ Refractory ovarian cancer: Decision points in diagnosis and new treatment strategies (CD‑ ROM). Clinical care options, LLC, 2006.

7. Heľpianska L et al. Karcinóm ovária. Bratislava 2006: 12– 15, 31– 37, 63– 77, 94– 113.

8. Bukowski RM, Ozols RF, Markman M. The managment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Sem Oncol 2007; 34 (2 Suppl 2): 8– 13.

9. Copeland LJ. Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. In: DiSaia PJ, Creasman WT (eds). Clinical Gynecologic Oncology. 7th ed. Mosby Elsevier 2007: 313– 395.

10. Lorusso D, Di Stefano A, Fanfani F et al. Role of gemcitabine in ovarian cancer treatment. Ann Oncol 2006; 17 (Suppl 5): 188– 194.

11. Rose PG, Mossbruger K, Fusco N et al. Gemcitabine reverse cisplatin resistance: Demonstration of activity in platinum –  and multidrug‑rezistent ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 88(1): 17– 21.

12. Villella J, Marchette D, Odunsi K et al. Response of combination platinum and gemcitabine chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95(3): 539– 545.

13. Parmar MK, Ledermann JA, Colombo N et al. Paclitaxel plus platinum‑based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum‑based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/ AGO- OVAR- 2.2 trial. Lancet 2003; 361(9375): 2099– 2106.

14. Pfisterer J, Plante M, Vergote I et al. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with carboplatin in patients with platinum‑ sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: an intergroup trial of AGO‑ OVAR, the NCICCTG, and the EORTC GCG. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(29): 4699– 4707.

15. González‑ Martin AJ, Calvo E, Bover I et al. Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in platinum‑ sensitive recurrent advanced ovarian carcinoma: A GEICO (Group Espanol de Investigacion en Cancer de Ovario) study. Ann Oncol 2005; 16(5): 749– 755.

16. Bookman MA, Malmström H, Bolis G et al. Topotecan for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: an open‑ label phase II study in patients treated after prior chemotherapy that contained cisplatin or carboplatin and paclitaxel. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16(10): 3345– 3352.

17. Rose PG, Blessing JA, Mayer AR et al. Prolonged oral etoposide as second‑line chemotherapy for platinum‑resistant and platinum‑ sensitive ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology study. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16(2): 405– 410.

18. Markman M, Webster K, Zanotti K et al. Phase 2 trial of single‑agent gemcitabine in platinum‑ paklitaxel refractory ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 90(3): 593– 596.

19. Nagourney RA, Brewer CA, Radecki S et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin repeating doublet therapy in previously treated, relapsed ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 88(1): 35– 39.

20. Tewari D, Monk BJ, Hunter M et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy is an active combination in the treatment of platinum‑resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 2004; 22(4): 475– 80.

21. Tesařík Z. Kontroverze v moderní léčbě pokročilého ovariálního karcinómu. Klin Onkol 2002; 15(4): 136– 141.

22. Harter P, du Bois A, Hahmann M et al. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Committee; AGO Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13(12): 1702– 1710.

Štítky
Paediatric clinical oncology Surgery Clinical oncology

Článok vyšiel v časopise

Clinical Oncology

Číslo 2

2010 Číslo 2
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#