Heart rate variability analysis during head-up tilt testing in diagnostics of reflex syncope – review of problems and our experiences
Authors:
J. Galuszka 1; K. Vykoupil 1; M. Kaiserová 2; J. Zapletalová 3; M. Kamasová 1; D. Galuszková 4; M. Táborský 1
Authors place of work:
I. interní klinika – kardiologická LF UP a FN Olomouc
1; Neurologická klinika FN Olomouc
2; Ústav lekářské biofyziky, LF UP, Olomouc
3; Transfuzní oddělení, FN Olomouc
4
Published in the journal:
Cesk Slov Neurol N 2022; 85(4): 312-322
Category:
Original Paper
doi:
https://doi.org/10.48095/cccsnn2022312
Summary
Introduction: Participation of autonomic nervous system activity in the pathophysiology of neurally-mediated reflex syncope is a research topic for over three decades. Published papers on this topic vary in methods used, patient sets, as well as in the results. Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the analysis of heart rate variability generated during particular phases of head-up tilt testing with the analysis of selected time periods during testing in patients with syncope history. Patients and methods: 80 persons examined for reflex syncope were divided into 4 groups of 20 according to the results of head-up tilt testing as: reference, bradycardiac, tachycardiac and vasodepressor. Exclusion criteria were medicines interfering with heart rate and atrial fibrillation. Spectral analysis of heart rate variability was performed by evaluation of the whole duration of the particular phases (tilting, supine) and evaluation of the selected ultra-short time periods (1 or 2 min) with visual checking of the sinus rhythm. Results: Statistically significant changes in heart rate variability parameters were found only in the bradycardiac group: within the first minute after termination of tilting, a decrease in the low frequency component (P = 0.015), an increase in the high frequency component (P = 0.015), and a decrease in the ratio of both components (P = 0.003); analysis of the whole recovery supine position revealed only a decrease in the ratio of both components (P = 0.015). There were also statistically significantly higher registered values of heart rate in the tachycardiac group and statistically significantly lower blood pressure values in the vasodepressor group during tilting and in the first minute after termination of tilting. Conclusion: Ultra-short-term heart rate variability analysis in time periods directly related to syncope in comparison with the analysis of the entire test phases demonstrated a higher number of significant changes in the endpoints related to autonomic regulation of blood circulation. Spectral analysis of heart rate variability in subjects with cardio-inhibitory reflex syncope revealed a significant increase and prevalence of the high frequency component in the time period immediately after syncope.
Keywords:
autonomic nervous system – heart rate variability – Syncope – tilt-table test
Zdroje
1. Raj SR. Neurally mediated syncope. In: Robertson D, Biaggioni I, Burnstock G et al (eds). Primer on the autonomic nervous system. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2012: 341–343.
2. Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J 2018; 39 (21): 1883–1947. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037.
3. Benarroch EE. Central autonomic control. In: Robertson D, Biaggioni I, Burnstock G et al (eds). Primer on the autonomic nervous system. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2012: 9–12.
4. Hamill RW, Shapiro RE, Vizzard MA. Peripheral autonomic nervous system. In: Robertson D, Biaggioni I, Burnstock G et al (eds). Primer on the autonomic nervous systém. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2012: 17–25.
5. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology: Heart Rate Variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 354–381.
6. Maheswari A, Norby FL, Soliman EZ et al. Low heart rate variability in a 2-minute electrocardiogram recording is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac ceath in the general population: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Plos One 11 (8); 2016: 1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161648.
7. Schaffer F, Meehan ZM, Zerr CL. A critical review of ultra-short-term heart rate variability norms research. Front Neurosci 2020; 19 (14): 570400: doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.594880.eCollection 2020
8. Castaldo R, Montesinos L, Melillo P et al. Ultra-short term HRV features as surogates of short term HRV: a case study on mental stress detection in real life. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19 (12): 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0274-y.
9. Esco MR, Flatt AA. Ultra-short-term heart rate variability indexes at rest and post-exercise in athletes: evaluating the agreement with accepted recommendations. J Sports Sci Med 2014; 13 (3): 535–541.
10. Shim SH, Park SY, Moon SN et al. Baseline heart rate variability in children and adolescents with vasovagal syncope. Korean J Pediatr 2014; 57 (4): 193–198. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2014.57.4.193.
11. Akizuki H, Haschiguchi N. Heart rate variability in patients with neurally mediated syncope in an emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 2020; 38: 211–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem2019.02.005.
12. Boulos M, Barron S, Nicolski E et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability during upright tilt test: a comparison of patients with syncope and normal subjects. Cardiology 1996; 87 (1): 28–32. doi: 10.1159/000177056.
13. Efremov K, Brisinda D, Venuti A et al. Heart rate variability analysis during head-up tilt test predicts nitroglycerin-induced syncope. Open Heart 2014; 1: e000063. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000063.
14. Budrejko S, Kempa M, Chmielecka M et al. Analysis of heart rate variability during head-up tilt-test in patients with vasovagal syncope. Eur J Transl Clin Med 2018; 1 (1): 26–38. doi: 10.31373/ejtcm/9283710.
15. Miranda CD, da Silva RM. Analysis of heart rate variability before and during tilt test in patients with cardioinhiobitory vasovagal syncope. Arq Bras Cardiol 2016; 107 (6): 568–575. doi: 10.5935/abc.2016177.
16. Ciliberti MA, Santoro F, Di Martino LF et al. Multisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2018; 111: 95–100. doi: 10.1016/ j.acvd.2017.04.006.
17. Klemenc M, Štrumbejl E. Predicting the outcome of head-up tilt testing using heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity parameters in patients with vasovagal syncope. Clin Auton Res 2015; 25 (6): 391–398. doi: 10.1007/s10286-015-03180-6.
18. Piccirillo G, Naso C, Moisè A et al. Heart rate and blood pressure variability in subjects with vasovagal syncope. Clin Sci (Lond.) 2004; 107 (1): 55–61. doi: 10.1042/CS20030327.
19. Lazzeri Ch, La Villa G, Barletta G. 24-hour heart rate variability in patients with vasovagal syncope. PACE 2000; 23 (4 Pt 1): 463–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00828.x.
20. Grimm W, Wirths A, Hoffmann J et al. Heart rate variabiliy during head-up tilt testing in patients with suspected neurally mediated syncope. PACE 1998; 21 (11 Pt 2): 2411–2415. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01192.x.
21. Kautzner J a výbor Pracovní skupiny pro arytmie a kardiostimulaci při České kardiologické společnosti. Synkopa: diagnostika a léčba. Cor Vasa 2007; 49 (Suppl 11): 63–73.
22. Wieling W, Groothuis JT. Physiology of upright posture. In: Robertson D, Biaggioni I, Burnstock G et al (eds). Primer on the autonomic nervous systém. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2012: 193–195.
23. Raj SR. Mechanisms of postural tachycardia syndrome. In: Robertson D, Biaggioni I, Burnstock G et al (eds). Primer on the autonomic nervous systém. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2012: 521–523.
24. Béchir M, Binggeli Ch, Corti R et al. Dysfunctional baroreflex regulation of sympathetic nerve activity in patients with vasovagal syncope. Circulation 2003; 107 (12): 1620–1625. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000056105.87 040.2B.
25. Freeman RL. Noninvasive evaluation of heart rate: time and frequency domains. In: Low PA, Benarroch EE (eds). Clinical autonomic disorders. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2008: 185–197.
26. Opavský J. Autonomní nervový systém a diabetická autonomní neuropatie. Klinické aspekty a diagnostika. Praha; Galén 2002.
Štítky
Paediatric neurology Neurosurgery NeurologyČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Czech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery
2022 Číslo 4
- Memantine Eases Daily Life for Patients and Caregivers
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Advances in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis on the Horizon
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Validation of questionnaire for evaluation of ischemic stroke sequels – the Czech version of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0
- Telemedical assessments by remote versions of ALBA, POBAV and ACE-III tests
- Pathological magnetic resonance imaging findings in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease
- Dabigatran pharmacogenetics and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke