Contemporary technicqes in diagnostic patients with vaginal microbiota

Česká verzia

Authors: D. Leško ¹; V. Buchta ^2,4; M. Salavec ³; P. Jílek ⁴; J. Kestřánek ¹; A. Drbohlavová ²; J. Špaček ¹
Authors place of work: Porodnická a gynekologická klinika FN, Hradec Králové, přednosta doc. MUDr. J. Špaček, Ph. D., IFEPAG ¹; Ústav klinické mikrobiologie LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové, přednostka doc. MUDr. H. Žemličková, Ph. D. ²; Klinika nemocí kožních a pohlavních FN, Hradec Králové, přednosta doc. MUDr. M. Salavec, CSc. ³; Katedra biologických a lékařských věd FaF UK, Hradec Králové, vedoucí doc. PharmDr. P. Nachtigal, Ph. D. ⁴
Published in the journal: Ceska Gynekol 2017; 82(2): 152-157

Summary

Objective:
Review of literature dealing with the specificity of the vagina from the standpoint of microbial colonization.

Design:
Literature review.

Setting:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty in Hradec Kralove, Charles University Prague.

Methods:
Analysis of the literature review and personal experience dealing with vaginal microbiota.

Keywords:
vaginal microbiota, lactobacilli, yeasts, asymptomatic carrier state

Zdroje

1. Amsel, R., Totten, PA., Spiegel,CA., Chen, KC., et al. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med, 74, 1983, p. 14–22.

2. Berg, AO., Heidrich, FE., Fihn, SD., et al. Establishing the cause of genitourinary symptoms in women in a family practice. comparison of clinical examination and comprehensive microbiology. JAMA, 1984, 251, p. 620–625.

3. Brown, HL., Fuller, DA., Davis, TE., et al. Evaluation of the affirm ambient temperature transport system for the detection and identification of Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Candida species from vaginal fluid specimens. J Clin Microbiol, 2001, 39, p. 3197–3199.

4. Buchta, C., Reitzner, M. Equiaffine inner parallel curves of a plane convex body and the convex hulls of randomly chosen points. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 1997, 108, 385–415.

5. Buchta, V., Spacek, J. [Microbiological findings in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in the Hradec Kralove Faculty Hospital 1995-2002]. Ces Gynek, 2004, 69, p. 7–14.

6. Buchta V, Spaček J. [Pitfalls of the current laboratory diagnosis and treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis]. Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. 2011, 17, p. 158–163.

7. Cartwright, CP., Lembke, BD., Ramachandran, K., et al. Comparison of nucleic acid amplification assays with BD Affirm VPIII for diagnosis of vaginitis in symptomatic women. J Clin Microbiol, 2013, 51, p. 3694–3699.

8. Cartwright, CP., Lembke, BD., Ramachandran, K., et al. Development and validation of a semiquantitative, multitarget PCR assay for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol, 2012, 50, p. 2321–2329.

9. DeMeo, LR., Draper, DL., McGregor, JA., et al. Evaluation of a deoxyribonucleic acid probe for the detection of trichomonas vaginalis in vaginal secretions. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 174, p. 1339–1342.

10. Donders, GG., Larsson, PG., Platz-Christensen, JJ., et al. Variability in diagnosis of clue cells, lactobacillary grading and white blood cells in vaginal wet smears with conventional bright light and phase contrast microscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2009, 145, p. 109–112.

11. Donders, GG., Marconi, C., Bellen, G. Interobserver variability in vaginal fluid wet mount microscopy can be reduced by precise definition of flora types and use of phase contrast. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2011, 15, p. 331–332; author reply p. 332–334.

12. Forstl, M., Spacek, J., Buchta, V., et al. Differential diagnosis of inflammations of the vagina and external genitalia and possibilities and limits of microbiologic examination]. Ces Gynek, 2005, 70, p. 79–86.

13. Fredricks, DN., Fiedler, TL., Thomas, KK., et al. Targeted PCR for detection of vaginal bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol, 2007, 45, p. 3270–3276.

14. Gajer, P., Brotman, RM., Bai, G., et al. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci Transl Med, 2012, 4, p. 132.

15. Jirovec, O. The problem of trichomoniasis. Akush Ginekol (Mosk), 1962, 38, p. 84-88.

16. Kobilkova, J., Pokorny, J., Jandova, A., Masata, J. Changes of morphologic and surface properties of cancer cells observed by cytology and histology depend on mitochondrial dysfunction. Acta Cytologica, 2010, 54, p. 477–479.

17. Lamont, RF., Sobel, JD., Akins, RA, et al. The vaginal microbiome: new information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques. BJOG, 2011, 118, p. 533–549.

18. Lascar, RM., Devakumar, H., Jungmann, E., et al. Is vaginal microscopy an essential tool for the management of women presenting with vaginal discharge? Int J STD AIDS, 2008, 19, p. 859–860.

19. Lu, H., Jiang, PC., Zhang, XD., et al. Characteristics of bacterial vaginosis infection in cervical lesions with high risk human papillomavirus infection. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8, p. 21080–21088.

20. Macklaim, JM., Fernandes, AD., Di Bella, JM., et al. Comparative meta-RNA-Seq of the vaginal microbiota and differential expression by lactobacillus iners in health and dysbiosis. Microbiome, 2013, 1, p. 12.

21. Martan, A., Svabik, K., Masata, J., et al. Correlation between stress urinary incontinence and anterior compartment defect before and after surgical treatment. Inter Urogynecol J, 2010, 21, p. S409–S410.

22. Mendes-Soares, H., Suzuki, H., Hickey, RJ., Forney, LJ. Comparative functional genomics of Lactobacillus spp. Reveals possible mechanisms for specialization of vaginal lactobacilli to their environment. J Bacteriol, 2014, 196, p. 1458–1470.

23. Petricevic, L., Domig, KJ., Nierscher, FJ., et al. Characterisation of the oral, vaginal and rectal lactobacillus flora in healthy pregnant and postmenopausal women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012, 160, p. 93–99.

24. Ravel, J., Gajer, P., Abdo, Z., et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2011, 108, Suppl. 1, p. 4680–4687.

25. Soll, DR., Pujol, C. Candida albicans alades. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 2003, 39, p. 1–7.

26. Spacek, J., Buchta, V., Jilek, P., Forstl, M. Clinical aspects and luteal phase assessment in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2007, 131, p. 198–202.

27. Spacek, J., Buchta, V., Veselsky, Z., Kalousek, I. [Host-yeast interactions in relation to the urogenital tract, vulvovaginal candidiasis and urologic aspects of mycotic diseases]. Ces Gynek, 2003, 68, p. 432–439.

28. Srinivasan, S., Liu, C., Mitchell, CM., et al. Temporal variability of human vaginal bacteria and relationship with bacterial vaginosis. PLoS One, 2010, 5, e10197.

29. Swidsinski, A., Doerffel, Y., Loening-Baucke, V., et al. Gardnerella biofilm involves females and males and is transmitted sexually. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2010, 70, p. 256–263.

30. Vallor, AC., Antonio, MA., Hawes, SE., Hillier, SL. Factors associated with acquisition of, or persistent colonization by, vaginal lactobacilli: role of hydrogen peroxide production. J Infect Dis, 2001, 184, p. 1431–1436.

31. Witkin, SS., Linhares, IM., Giraldo, P. Bacterial flora of the female genital tract: function and immune regulation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2007, 21, p. 347–354.

32. Zdolsek, B., Hellberg, D., Froman, G., et al. Culture and wet smear microscopy in the diagnosis of low-symptomatic vulvovaginal candidosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1995, 58, p. 47–51.