Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions: Classification and Pathogenesis (Part 1)

Česká verzia

Authors: J. Nemšovská
Authors place of work: Dermatovenerologická klinika LF UK a UNB, Bratislava, prednostka prof. MUDr. Mária Šimaljaková, PhD., MPH, MHA
Published in the journal: Čes-slov Derm, 94, 2019, No. 3, p. 99-106
Category: Reviews (Continuing Medical Education)

Summary

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) represent 15% of all adverse drug reactions. Various mechanisms, resulting in miscellaneous clinical pictures, are involved in the genesis of these reactions. DHRs can be classified by different classifications based e. g. on the timing of the symptoms appearance or types of immune mechanisms.

Currently increasingly used classification is based on the mode of action of drugs leading to immune/inflammatory cell stimulation. We recognize three kinds of DHRs according to the mechanism of cell stimmulation: allergic reaction mediated by hapten-carrier complex, reaction triggered by pharmacological interaction of the drug with immune receptors and pseudo-allergic reaction, in which drug stimulates or inhibits receptors or enzymes of inflammatory cells.

None of these classifications is ideal and is not able to explain or to link to the nature of the disease, pathomechanisms, clinical pictures, cross-reactivity or optimal treatments, because the interactions between the drug and the immune system are far more complex than previously anticipated. Except for the classification and pathogenesis of DHRs, clinical presentations and variabilities of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions and delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions are mentioned in this article, including DRESS (Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms), SJS (Stevens- Johnson syndrome), TEN (Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis) and AGEP (Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis) and the most common culprit drugs. DHRs are an important public health issue due to their potential risk of life-threatening anaphylaxis and severe cutaneous adverse reactions.

Keywords:

clinical picture – classification – drug hypersensitivity – allergic reaction – non-allergic reaction – p-i concept

Zdroje

1. BLUMENTHAL, K. G., LAI, K. H., HUANG, M. et al. Adverse and Hypersensitivity Reactions to Prescription Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agents in a Large Health Care system. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract., 2017 Jan 18. pii: S2213-2198(16)30669-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.006.

2. BROCKOW, K., PRZYBILLA, B., ABERER, W. et al. Guideline for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions. Allergo J. Int., 2015, 24(3), p. 94–105.

3. CASTELLS GUITART, M. C. Rapid drug desensitization for hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies in the 21^st century. J. Invesig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol., 2014, 24(2), p. 72–79.

4. DIKA, E., RAVAIOLI, G. M., FANTI, P. A. et al. Cutaneous adverse effects during ipilimumab treatment for metastatic melanoma: a prospective study. Eur. J. Dermatol., 2017, 27(3), p. 266–270.

5. FARNAM, K., CHANG, C., TEUBER, S. et al. Non-allergic drug hypersensitivity reactions. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 2012, 159(4), p. 327–345.

6. FELDMEYER, L., HEIDEMEYER, K., YAWALKER, N. Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis: Pathogenesis, Genetic, Background, Clinical Variants and Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2016, 17(8), p. 1214.

7. GARON, S. L., PAVLOS, R. K., WHITE, K. D. et al. Pharmacogenomics of off-target adverse drug reactions. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 2017, 83(9), p. 1896–1911.

8. GUEANT, J. L., ROMANO, A., CORNEJO-GARCIA, J. A. et al. HLA-DRA variants predict penicillin allergy in genomewide fine-mapping genotyping. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 2015, 135(1), p. 253–259.

9. CHEN, CH. B., ABE, R., PAN, R. Y. et al. An Updated review of the Molecular Mechanisms in Drug Hypersensitivity. J. Immunol. Res., 2018, ID 6431694, 22 pages. Dostupné na www: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6431694 .

10. CHUNG, W. H., HUNG, S. I., YANG, J. Y. et al. Granulysin is a key mediator for disseminated keratinocyte death in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Nat. Med., 2008, 12, p. 1343–1350.

11. ILLING, P. T., VIVIAN, J. P., DUDEK, N. L. et al. Immune self-reactivity triggered by drug-modified HLA-peptide repertoire. Nature, 2012, 484, p. 554–558.

12. IMMATTEO, M., KESKIN, T., JERSCHOW, E. Evaluation of periprocedural hypersensitivity reactions. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 2017, 119(4), p. 349.e2–355.e2.

13. KARÁSEK, D., VYMĚTAL, J., CIBÍČKOVÁ, L. et al. DRESS syndrom vzniklý při léčbě alopurinolem. Klin. Farmakol. Farm., 2014, 28(4), p. 152–157.

14. KOVÁČOVÁ, S. DIHS – liekmi indukovaný hypersenzitívny syndróm. Dermatol. Prax, 2014, 8(2), p. 40–64.

15. MAYORGA, C., CELIK, G., ROUZAIRE, P. et al. In vitro tests for drug hypersensitivity reactions: an ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group position paper. Allergy, 2016, 71, p, 1103–1134.

16. McNEIL, B. D., PUNDIR, P., MEEKER, S. et al. Identification of a mast-cell-specific receptor crucial for pseudo-allergic drug reactions. Nature, 2015, 519, p. 237–241.

17. MING, L., WEN, Q., QIAO, H. L., DONG, Z. M. Interleukin-18 and IL18-607A/C and – 137G/C gene polymorphisms in patients with penicillin allery. J. Int. Med. Res., 2011, 39(2), p. 388–398.

18. MONTANEZ, M. I., MAYORGA, G., BOGAS, G. et al. Epidemiology, mechanisms, and diagnosis of drug-induced anaphylaxis. Front. Immunol., 2017, 9, p. 614.

19. MUNOZ-CANO, R., OICADO, C., VALERO, A., BARTRA, J. Mechanisms of anaphylaxis beyond IgE. J. Invesig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol., 2016, 26(2), p. 73–82.

20. NEGRINI, S., BECQUEMONT, L. Pharmacogenetics of hypersensitivity drug reactions. Therapie, 2017 Jan 3. pii: S0040-5957(16)31285-9. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2016.12.009.

21. NEMŠOVSKÁ, J., ŠVECOVÁ, D. Hypersenzitívne reakcie vyvolané liekmi. Dermatol. Prax, 2017, 11(3), p. 112–116.

22. PICHLER, W. J., BEELER, A., KELLER, M. et al. Pharmacological Interaction of Drugs with Immune Receptors: The p-i Concept. Allergol. Int., 2006, 55, p. 17–25.

23. PICHLER, W. J., HAUSMANN, O. Classification of Drug Hypersensitivity into Allergic, p-i, and Pseudo-Allergic Forms. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 2016, 171, p. 166–179.

24. PICHLER, W. J., NAISBIITT, D. J., KEVIN PARK, B. Immune patomechanism of drug hypersensitivity reactions. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 2011, 127(3), p. S74–S81.

25. ROMANO, A., TORRES, M. J., CASTELLS, M. et al. Diagnosis and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 2011, 127(3), p. S67–S73.

26. SCHERER, K., BROCKOW, K., ABERER, W. Desensitization in delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions – an EAACI position paper of Drug Allergy Interest Group. Allergy, 2013, 68(7), p. 844–852.

27. ŠTORK, J. et al. Dermatovenerologie. První vydání. Galén. Karolinum. Praha. 2008, ISBN 978-80-7262-371-6 (Galén), ISBN 978-80-246-1360-4.

28. TORRES, M. J., ROMANO, A., CELIK, G. et al. Approach to the dignosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: similarities and differences between Europe and North America. Clin. Transl. Allergy, 2017, 7, p. 7–25.

29. USHIGOME, Y., KANO, Y., HIRAHARA, K., SHIOHARA, T. Human herpesvirus 6 reactivation in drug-induced hypersensitivity sndrome and DRESS validation score. Am. J. Med., 2012, 125(7), p. 9–10.

30. WATKINS, S., PICHLER, W. J. Sulfamethoxazol induces a switch mechanism in T cell receptors containing TCRVβ20-1, altering pHLA recognition. PLoS One, 2013, 8(10), article e76211.

31. WHITE, K. D., CHUNG, W. H., HUNG, S. J. et al. Envolving models of the immunopathogenesis of T cell-mediated drug allergy: the role of host, pathogens, and drug response. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 2015, 136(2), p. 219–234.

32. WÖHRL, S. NSAID hypersensitivity – recommendations for diagnostic work up and patient management. Allergo. J. Int., 2018, 27(4), p. 114–121.