The fatal consequences of CAN syndrome – scoping review
Authors:
I. Olecká 1; P. Dobríková 2; J. Slaný 2,3
Authors place of work:
Katedra křesťanské sociální práce, Cyrilometodějská teologická fakulta, Univerzita Palackého, Olomouc
1; Fakulta zdravotníctva a sociálnej práce, Trnavská univerzita, Trnava, Slovensko
2; Klinika pediatrie, Fakultná nemocnica v Trnave, Slovensko
3
Published in the journal:
Čes-slov Pediat 2021; 76 (5): 276-285.
Category:
Review
Summary
To date studies exploring fatal forms of maltreatment, neglect or abuse of children have only been treated as peripheral issues. The aim of the presented study is to identify CAN syndrome risk factors with fatal consequences based on the analysis of primary texts. The Ebsco and Web of Science databases formed the sources for the search. Full-text versions of studies were reviewed for relevance at two stages of the research by two independent assessors. Finally, after the application of all the criteria for exclusion, 10 studies were included in the analysis.
The studies consistently confirm that the most frequent perpetrators of maltreatment, neglect or abuse of children are the parents. Fathers tend to cause the death of their children more often by fatal abuse, whereas mothers tend to be guilty of fatal neglect. Mothers are liable for the death of younger children, and fathers are more frequently responsible for the death of older children. In terms of social-demographic profile, the studies analyzed led us to identify the following basic risk factors: low social-economic status, the mother being the sole breadwinner, and infant children with a younger mother. A direct correlation was drawn mainly between a child’s death and cases of physical trauma.
A hypothesis can be extrapolated from the analyzed studies that the age of the abused children affects both the mechanism and the relationship between the perpetrators and their victims. The fact that the conclusions of studies agree that fatal consequences of maltreatment are not being duly identified as risky early enough by the relevant authorities is a very debatable finding.
Keywords:
child – CAN syndrome – fatal abuse – fatal neglect
Zdroje
1. Schnitzer PG, Gulino SP, Yuan YYT. Advancing public health surveillance to estimate child maltreatment fatalities: review and recommendations. Child Welfare 2013; 92 (2): 77–98.
2. Peters M, Godfrey C, Mcinerney P, et al. Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Reviewers Manual. Joanna Briggs Institute 2015: 3–24.
3. Klugarová J, Klugar M, Marečková J, Hájek M. Methodology of systematic review development I:the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on mortality in adults with craniotrauma. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2015; 78/111 (5): 555–561.
4. Damashek A, Nelso M, Bonner BL. Fatal child maltreatment: Characteristics of deaths from physical abuse versus neglect. Child Abuse Negl 2013; 37 (10): 735–744.
5. Douglas EM, Mohn BL. Fatal and non-fatal child maltreatment in the US: An analysis of child, caregiver, and service utilization with the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data Set. Child Abuse Negl 2014; 38 (1): 42–51.
6. Kajese TM, et al. Characteristics of child abuse homicides in the state of Kansas from 1994 to 2007. Child Abuse Negl 2011; 35 (2): 147–154.
7. Meadow R. Unnatural sudden infant death. Arch Dis Child 1999; 80 (1): 7–14.
8. Overpeck MD, et al. Risk factors for infant homicide in the United States. N Engl J Med 1998; 339 (17): 1211–1216.
9. Putnam-Hornstein E, et al. Risk of fatal injury in young children following abuse allegations: Evidence from a prospective, population-based study. Am J Public Health 2013; 103 (10): e39–e44.
10. Ross Ah, Abel SM, Radisch D. Pattern of injury in child fatalities resulting from child abuse. Forensic Sci Int 2009; 188 (1–3): 99–102.
11. Sidebotham P, Retzer A. Maternal filicide in a cohort of English serious case reviews. Arch Womens Ment Health 2019; 22 (1): 139–149.
12. Smithey M. Infant homicide: Victim/offender relationship and causes of death. J Fam Violence 1998; 13 (3): 285–297.
13. Sidebotham P, et al. Fatal child maltreatment in England, 2005– 2009. Child Abuse Negl 2011; 35 (4): 299–306.
14. Olecká I. Infanticidum v minulosti a současnosti. Vývojové změny sociálně patologických jevů v proměnách času. Česká sociologická společnost, sborník z konference sekce sociální patologie, Svratka. Praha: Výzkumný ústav kriminalistiky, 2018.
15. Olecká I, Ivanová K, Dobiáš M, a kol. Náhlá, neočekávaná a násilná úmrtí dětí do 1 roku na severní Moravě v letech 2007 – 2016. Folia soc med leg Slovacae 2018; 8 (1): 38–44.
16. Olecká I, Lemrová A. The pitfalls of diagnosing sudden infant death syndrome: Case studies. Grand Journal 2019; 7 (2).
17. Hirt M. Soudní lékařství. Praha: Grada, 2015.
18. Dudová R. Práce jako řešení? Strategie obživy osamělých matek v ČR. Sociologický Časopis/Czech Sociological Review 2009; 45 (4): 753–784.
19. Wilkinson RG, Marmot MG. Sociální determinanty zdraví. Kostelec nad Černými lesy: Institut zdravotní politiky a ekonomiky, 2005.
20. Ševčík D, Špatenková N. Domácí násilí. Praha: Portál, 2011.
21. Lemrová A, Ivanová K, Janoušková K. Ztracené životní šance. In: Lubelcová G (ed). Paralely a divergence. Zborník z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2018.
22. Mičicová B. Implementace Úmluvy o právech dítěte v České republice. Praha: Kancelář Poslanecké sněmovny, 2017.
23. Pemová T, Ptáček R. Zanedbávání dětí: příčiny, důsledky a možnosti hodnocení. Praha: Grada, 2016.
24. Stanton J, Simpson A. Murder misdiagnosed as SIDS: a perpetrator‘ s perspective. Arch Dis Child 2001; 85 (6): 454–459.
25. Meadow R. Suffocation. ABC of Child Abuse 1989; sv. 298: 1572– 1573.
26. Le Fanu J. Wrongful diagnosis of child abuse – a master theory. J R Soc Med 2005; 98 (6): 249–254.
27. Ivanová K, Olecká I, a kol. Analýza pitevních protokolů dětí zemřelých do jednoho roku života v Olomouckém a Zlínském kraji – možné souvislosti zdravotní gramotnosti matek s diagnózou SIDS. Folia soc med leg Slovacae 2016; 6 (1): 38–44.
28. Dunovský J, et al. Týrané, zneužívané a zanedbávané dítě. Praha: Grada, 1995.
29. Biskup P. Diagnostika syndromu týraného, zneužívaného a zanedbávaného dítěte –doporučený postup určený lékařům primární péče. Pediatr praxi 2001; 4: 164–168.
30. Mydlíková E, Patyi P, Vargová D, a kol. Creating rapid test for timely CAN syndrome diagnostics. La revue est référencée dans la base de données Scopus. Sommaire, Pensée plurielle 2019; 2 (50): 1–184.
Štítky
Neonatology Paediatrics General practitioner for children and adolescentsČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Czech-Slovak Pediatrics
2021 Číslo 5
- What Effect Can Be Expected from Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis?
- The Importance of Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Administration to Diabetics with Gingivitis
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Congenital pulmonary airway malformation
- Iron deficiency anemia caused by malnutrition – case report
- Bulky gastroduodenal trichobezoar (Rapunzel syndrome) causing abdominal pain and anorexia in a nine-year-old female
- Congenital pulmonary airway malformation and pulmonary sequestration – 15 years of experience at the Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital in Hradec Králové