Opinions of the citizens of the Czech Republic on selected aspects of the activities of general practitioners – 2021
Authors:
K. Javorská 1; D. Halata 1; S. Býma 1; B. Seifert 2
Authors place of work:
Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Hradci Králové, Ústav preventivního lékařství, Přednostka: prof. MUDr. Lenka Borská, PhD.
1; 1. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, Praha, Ústav všeobecného lékařství, Přednosta: doc. MUDr. Bohumil Seifert, Ph. D.
2
Published in the journal:
Prakt. Lék. 2022; 102(5): 248-258
Category:
Of different specialties
Summary
Resources: The Czech Medical Society of JEP – the Society of General Practice periodically monitors citizens’ opinions on selected aspects of general practitioner’s activities. This publication follows previous outputs of research carried out between the years 2015 and 2020.
Aim and methods: The aim of this research was to identify Czech citizens’ opinions on some aspects of the work carried out by general practitioners (GPs). The method of conducted interviews between interviewer and respondent (face-to-face) performed by a professional agency was chosen with the aim to representatively research the opinions of Czech citizens. Statistical data was processed by SASD 1.5.8 (Statistical analysis of social data).
Results: In the representative sociological research, 1788 citizens were interviewed. The subjects of the sample were chosen randomly using quota-type selection. The research results are representative of Czech citizens over the age of 15, with respect to gender, age and region. The citizens are by a vast majority satisfied with the care and time invested in their examination by their GPs and nurses. Only a small minority of subjects hold a negative opinion. Compared to the 2015–2020 period, the number of citizens who expressed the highest degree of satisfaction significantly decreased in 2021. It is most likely due to the surgery time cuts during the covid-19 pandemic. Citizens’ satisfaction with the care and time invested by the nurses is higher than the GPs’, there was no significant decrease noticed in nurses’ performance as with GPs’. 83.8% of Czech citizens state that they find e-prescription provided by their GPs fully or mostly satisfactory. Only 8% of respondents state they are somewhat or completely unsatisfactory. Regarding e-sick notes provided by the GP the majority of Czech citizens (69%) find this possibility satisfactory. A vast majority of respondents (38.8%) state that they are partially satisfied with telemedicine though physical presence in the surgery is very important. The main way of distant communication with their GP respondents stated telephone (85.6%). When questioned about the preventive checks a vast majority of citizens (41.1%) undergo the check when invited by the GP surgery, more than ⅓ (34.3%) actively ask themselves for a check up. When questioned about the factors influencing quality of life such as obesity and smoking only 7.7% citizens stated that they find themselves overweight or obese and would appreciate intervention or treatment by their GP covered by the national health insurance, 20.6% of respondents smoke but is not interested in treatment, 3.5% of citizens smoke and would appreciate intervention or treatment by their GP covered by the national health insurance. Self management tools include regular weighting, blood pressure measurement and step measurement. Regular weighting provides 63.4% of respondents, blood pressure check 49.6% respondents and the amount of steps regularly provide 42.2% of respondents.
Keywords:
primary medical care – Telemedicine – general practitioner – e-prescription
Zdroje
1. Český statistický úřad. Věkové složení obyvatelstva České republiky v roce 2020. Stav k 31. 12. 2020. Praha: Český statistický úřad 2021.
2. Býma S, Seifert B, Král N. Výzkum názorů a postojů občanů České republiky k všeobecným praktickým lékařům. Prakt. Lék. 2016; 96(5): 217–222.
3. Býma S, Seifert B, Král N. Výzkum názorů a postojů občanů České republiky na vybrané aspekty činnosti všeobecných praktických lékařů v roce 2016. Prakt. Lék. 2017; 97(4): 151-–155.
4. Bělobrádek J, Býma S, Seifert B. Názory občanů České republiky na vybrané aspekty činnosti všeobecných praktických lékařů – 2017. Prakt. Lék. 2018; 98(3): 109–115.
5. Bomberová-Kánská P, Býma S, Seifert B. Názory občanů České republiky na vybrané aspekty činnosti všeobecných praktických lékařů – 2018. Prakt. Lék. 2019; 99(4): 160–167.
6. Javorská K, Halata D, Býma S, Seifert B. Názory občanů České republiky na vybrané aspekty činnosti všeobecných praktických lékařů – 2019. Prakt. Lék. 2020; 100(4): 194–200.
7. Halata D, Javorská K, Býma S, Seifert B. Názory občanů České republiky na vybrané aspekty činnosti všeobecných praktických lékařů – 2020. Prakt. Lék. 2021; 101(5): 261–267.
8. Společnost všeobecného lékařství ČLS JEP. Doporučený postup telemedicína. Centrum doporučených postupů pro praktické lékaře 2020 [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.svl.cz/files/files/ Doporucene-postupy/2020/DP-Telemedicina.pdf [cit. 2022-10-10].
9. Chan M. The rising importance of family medicine [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/ detail/the-rising-importance-of-family-medicine [cit. 2022-10-10].
10. Hartvigsen G, Pedersen P. Lessons learned from 25 years with telemedicine in Northern Norway, University Hospital of North Norway Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine 2015; 3–5. Dostupné z: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 289976909_Lessons_learned_from_25_years_with_telemedicine_ in_Northern_Norway/link/5693cd8608ae3ad8e- 33b30ee/download [cit. 2022-10-10].
11. Scottish Government. The modern outpatient: a collaborative approach 2017–2020 [online]. Dostupné z: https://www. gov.scot/publications/modern-outpatient-collaborative-approach- 2017-2020/ [cit. 2022-10-10].
12. Lupton D. The digitally engaged patient: self-monitoring and selfcare in the digital health era. Soc Theory Health 2013; 11: 256–270.
13. OECD. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. State of Health in the EU. Česko: zdravotní profil země 2021. Dostupné z: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/a3017bfb- cs.pdf [cit. 2022-10-10].
14. Ministerstvo zdravotnictví ČR. Zdraví 2030. Dostupné z: https:// zdravi2030.mzcr.cz/
15. Drinkwater C, Wildman J, Moffatt S. Social prescribing BMJ 2019; 364: l1285. doi:10.1136/bmj.l1285.
16. Strategický rámec rozvoje péče o zdraví v České republice do roku 2030, Implementační plán č. 1.1 Reforma primární péče, MZČR. Dostupné z: https://zdravi2030.mzcr.cz/
Štítky
General practitioner for children and adolescents General practitioner for adultsČlánok vyšiel v časopise
General Practitioner
2022 Číslo 5
- Memantine Eases Daily Life for Patients and Caregivers
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Advances in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis on the Horizon
- What Effect Can Be Expected from Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Anatomy of the venous and nervous system of the lower limb
- Clean intermittent catheterization of the urinary bladder
- Eating preferences of university students in connection with their body composition
- Education of General Practicioners at Slovak Medical University in Bratislava