Comparative study of detection and evaluation of the size of oesophageal varices with the use of 12 and 20 MHz frequency radial endosonography vs. esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Česká verzia

Authors: I. Tozzi ¹; V. Procházka ¹ ; M. Holinka ¹ ; J. Zapletalová ²; I. Vinklerová ¹
Authors place of work: II. interní klinika Lékařské fakulty UP a FN Olomouc, přednosta doc. MUDr. Vlastimil Procházka, Ph. D. ¹; Ústav lékařské biofyziky Lékařské fakulty UP Olomouc, přednosta prof. Ing. Jan Hálek, CSc. ²
Published in the journal: Vnitř Lék 2008; 54(6): 597-603
Category: Original Contributions

Summary

Introduction:
Portal hypertension is an important marker in the development of life-threatening complications of hepaticcirrhosis. It is the direct cause of oesophageal varices (OV), liver encephalopathy, and of ascites. One of the most important locations where the junctions between the portal and systemic circulation become dilated is the region of the oesophagus and the stomach. Bleeding from OV can be the cause of death in as many as 1/3 of cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a standard procedure to examine gastro-oesophageal varices, but radial endosonography (EUS) allows for precise quantification of the size of oesophageal and stomach varices including their diagnosis at a stage when they still cannot be distinguished by standard EGD.

The objective of the study was to assess the benefit of 12 and 20 MHz EUS and EGD in the detection of oesophageal and stomach varices (including varices which still cannot be diagnosed endoscopically and in determining their size. Another objective was to find out whether there is a link between hepatic functional impairment measured by the Child-Pugh scale and the size of oesophageal varices. We also assessed the incidence and size of varices with respect to portal blood flow measured by Doppler examination.

Method:
The group contained 31 patients with proven hepatic cirrhosis.

Results:
The sensitivity rate of EGD with respect to EUS expressing the portion of patients with a positive outcome was 92%. The specificity rate expressing the quantity of healthy individuals with a negative result was 83%.

Key words:
endosonography – oesophagogastroduodenoscopy – oesophageal varices – gastric varices – hepatic cirrhosis – portal hypertension

Zdroje

1. Pascal JP, Cales P. Multicenter Group. Propranolol in the prevention of first upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 856-861.

2. Brocchi E, Caletti GC, NIEC. Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. N Engl J Med 1988; 329: 983-989.

3. Rigo GP, Merighi A, Chahin NJ et al. A prospective study of the ability of three endoscopic classifications to predict hemorrhage from esophageal varices. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 425-429.

4. Bendtsen F, Skovggard LT, Sorensen TIA et al. Agreement among multiple observers on endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal varices before bleeding. Hepatology 1990; 11: 341-347.

5. Degradi AE. The natural history of esophageal varices in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Am J Gastro 1977; 57: 520-540.

6. Hou MC, Lin HC, Lee FY et al. Recurrence of esophageal varices following endoscopic treatment and its impact on rebleeding: comparison of sclerotherapy and ligation. J Hepatol 2000; 32: 202-208.

7. Suzuki T, Matsunati S, Umebara K et al. EUS changes predictive for recurrence of esophageal varices in patients treated by combined endoscopic ligation and sclerotherapy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 611-617.

8. Lebrec D, Fleury P, Reuff B et al. Portal hypertension, size of esophageal varices, and risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in alcoholic cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1980; 79: 1139-1144.

9. Cales P, Vinel JP, Caucanas JP et al. Incidence of large oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: application to prophylaxis of first bleeding. Gut 1990; 31: 1298-1302.

10. The North Italian Endoscopic Club for the Study and Treatment of Esophageal Varices. Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 983-989.

11. Cales P, Zabotto B, Meskens C et al. Gastroesophageal endoscopic features in cirrhosis. Observer variability, inter-associations, and relationship to hepatic dysfunction. Gastroenterology 1990; 98: 156-162.

12. Beppu K, Inokuchi K, Koyanagi N et al. Prediction of variceal hemorrhage by esophageal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1981; 27: 213-218.

13. Sauerbruch T, KIeber G. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with portal hypertension. Endoscopy 1992; 24: 45-51.

14. Liu JB, Miller LS, Feld RI et al. Gastric and esophageal varices: 20 MHz transnasal endoluminal US. Radiology 1993; 187: 363-366.

15. Burtin P, Calés P, Oberti F et al. Endoscopic ultrasonographic signs of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 257-261.

16. Choudhuri G, Dhiman RK, Agarval DK. Endosonographic evaluation of the venous anatomy around the gastro-esophageal junction in patients with portal hypertension. Hepatogastroenterology 1996; 43: 1250-1255.

17. Schiano TD, Adrain AL, Cassidy MJ et al. Use of high resolution endoluminal sonography to measure the wall thickness and radius of esophageal varices. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 425-428.

18. Caletti G, Brocchi E, Baraldini M et al. Assessment aessment of portal hypertension by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36: 521-527.

19. Miller J et al. Comparison of high-resolution endoluminal sonography to video endoskopy in the detection and evaluation of esophageal varices. Hepatology 1996; 24: 552-555.

20. Miller LS, Liu JB, Newman M et al. High frequency endoluminal sonography of esophageal varices using a 20 MHz ultrasound transducer compared to endoscopic grading of the size of esophageal varices. Gastroenterology 1992; 102: 853A.

21. Irisawa A, Obara K, Sato Y et al. EUS analysis of collateral veins inside and outside the esophageal wall in portal hypertension. 1999; 50: 374-380.

22. Caletti GC, Bolondi L, Zani L et al. Detection of portal hypertension and esophageal varices by means of endoscopic ultrasonography. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21(Suppl 123): 74-77.

23. Irisawa A, Saito A, Obara K et al. Endoscopic recurrence of esophageal varices is associated with the specific EUS abnormalities: severe periesophageal collateral veins and large perforating veins. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 77-84.

24. Irisawa A, Saito A, Obara K et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonographic analysis of variceal hemodynamics for the treatment of esophageal varices. Fukushima J Med Sci 2001; 47: 39-50.

25. Seno H, Konishi Y, Wada M et al. Endoscopic ultrasonograph evaluation of vascular structures in the gastric cardia predicts esophageal variceal recurrence following endoscopic treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 227-231.

26. Konishi Y, Nakamura T, Kida H et al. Catheter US probe EUS evaluation of gastric cardia and perigastric vascular structures to predict esophageal variceal recurrence. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 197-203.

27. Boustiere C, Dumas O, Jouffre C et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography classification of gastric varices in patients with cirrhosis. Comparison with endoscopic findings. J Hepatol 1993; 19: 268-272.

28. Seno H, Konishi Y, Wada M et al. Improvement of collateral vessels in the vicinity of gastric cardia after endoscopic variceal ligation therapy for esophageal varices. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 400-404.