International comparison of health services and health systems
Authors:
Barták Miroslav 1; Dlouhý Martin 2
Authors place of work:
Univerzita J. E. Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem, Fakulta sociálně ekonomická
vedoucí pracoviště RNDr. Jaroslav Koutský, Ph. D.
1; Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze
2
Published in the journal:
Reviz. posud. Lék., 16, 2013, č. 4, s. 123-128
Category:
Review article
Summary
The article offers a synthesis of methodology in international comparison of public health systems, calls attention to the problems as well as the opportunities for development in this area which might be relevant in our domestic conditions. The article is based on review of relevant articles published in impacted journals and respected international databases in the area of international comparisons. An international comparison is a vastly used tool for the formational and analysis of public health policy, which consists in the presumption that international experiences can be transferred from one country to another. The international evidence indicates that the method of international comparison is a widely used and useful, but also a relatively controversial tool in the creation of health policy. The comparison undergoes on the supranational and national level, as well as on the regional and local one, respectively. The availability of robust statistical data and a wrong understanding of the context on individual health systems is the lasting problem of such comparisons. In some cases the systems are not comparable from methodological and/or the data base points of view.
Keywords:
international comparison – investigation of medical services – health policy methods
Zdroje
1. Armitage, P. National Health Survey System in the European Community. International Journal of Epidemiology, 1976, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 321–326.
2. Arah, O. A., Klazinga, N. S., Delnoij, D. M. J., Ten Asbroek, A. H. A., Custer, T. Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: a quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2003, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 377–398.
3. Barták, M. Mezinárodní srovnávání zdravotnických systémů. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2012, 336 s., ISBN 978-80-7357-984-5.
4. Bowling, A. Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services. Maidenhead and New York: Open University Press, 2009, 525 p., ISBN 978 0 335 23364 3.
5. Black, N., Brazier J., Fitzpatrick R., Reeves B. Health Services Research Methods: A Guide to Best Practice. London: Blackwell BMJ Books 1998.
6. Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., Devers, K. Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory. Health Services Research, 2007, vol. 42, iss 4, p. 1758–1772.
7. Brinkerhoff, D. W. Accountability and health systems: toward conceptual clarity and policy relevance. Health Policy and Planning, 2004, vol. 19, no. 6, p. 371–379.
8. Brody, B. A., Lie, R. K. Methodological and Conceptual Issues in Health System Comparisons: Canada, Norway, and the United States. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1993, vol. 18, p. 437–463.
9. Dancet, E. A. F., DHooghe, T. M. D., Sermeus, W., Empel van, I., Strohmer, H., Wyns, C., Santa-Cruz, D., Nardo, L. G., Kovatchki, D., Vanlangenakker, L., Garcia-Velasco, J. Mulugeta, B., Nelen, W. L. D. M., Kremer, J. A.M. Patients from acrros Europe have simile views on patient-centred care: an international multilingual qualitative study in infertility care. Human Reproduction, 2012, vol. 27, no. 6, p. 1702–1711.
10. Dlouhý, M. Mental Health Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Praha: Professional Publishing, 2012, 140 p., ISBN 978-80--7431-110-9.
11. Fulop, N., Allen, P., Clarke, A., Black, N. Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services, Research methods. London: Routledge Publishers, 2001.
12. Freeman, R. A National Health Service, By Comparison. Social History of Medicine, 2008, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 503–520.
13. Georgiou, A., Westbrook, J., Callen, J. Multi-method studies in health services research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2007, volume 31, Issue 5, page 492.
14. Kernick, D. Wanted – new methodologies for health service research. Is complexity theory the answer? Family Practice, 2006, 23, 3, p. 385–390.
15. Lohr, K. N., Steinwachs, D. M. Health services research: an evolving definition of the field. Health Services Research, 2002, 37, 1, p. 7–9.
16. McCoy, D. The High Level Taskforce on Innovative International Financing for Health Systems. Health Policy and Planning, 2009, 24, p. 321–323.
17. McPake, B., Mills, A. What can we learn from international comparisons of health systems and health system reform? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000, 78, 6.
18. Mielck, A., Cavelaars, A., Helmert, U., Martin, K. Winkelhake, O. Kunst, A. E. Comparison of health inequalities between East and West Germany. European Journal of Public Health, 2000, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 262–267.
19. Mills, A. Health policy and systems research: defining the terrain; identifying the methods. Health Policy and Plan, 2012, vol. 27, iss 1., p. 1–7.
20. Moore, Dale A., Carpenter, T. E. Spatial Analytical Methods and Geographic Information Systems: Use in Health Research and Epidemiology. Epidemiol. Rev. 1999, Vol. 21, p. 143–161.
21. O’Cathain, A. N., Jon E. Murphy Structural issues affecting mixed methods studies in health research: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2009 Vol. 9, Iss. 1, ISSN: 1471-2288.
22. O’Cathain, A. Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study [online]. BMC Health services research, 2007. 7, 85.
23. Ommen, O., Janssen Pfaff, C. H., Lefering R., Neugebauer, E. Health services research in Sumery – definitions, approaches and methods. Langenbecks Arch. Surg., 2008 393, p. 985–994.
24. Parkin, D. W., McGuire, A. J., Yule, B. F. What do international comparison of health care expenditures really show? Community Medicine, 1989, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 116–123.
25. Pittman, P. Health Services Research in 2020. Health Services Research, vol. 45, iss. 5, s. 1431–1441.
26. Ranson, K. T., Law, J. S., Bennett, S. Establishing health systems financing research priorities in developing countries using a participatory metodology. Social Science & Medicine, 2010, vol. 70, iss. 12, p. 1933–1942.
27. Rao, S. R., Graubard, B.. I Schmid, Ch. H. et al. Meta-analysis of survey data: application to health services research [online]. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, 2008, vol. 8, iss. 2, p. 98.
28. Redinger, C. F., Levine, S. P., Blotzer, M. J. et al. Establishing health systems financing research priorities in developing countries using a participatory methodology [online]. AIHA Journal, 2002. vol. 63, iss. 1, p. 34.
29. Robins, C. S., Ware, N. C., Dosreis, S. et al. Dialogues on Mixed-Methods and Mental Health Services Research: Anticipating Challenges. Building Solutions Psychiatric Services, 2008, vol. 59, Iss. 7, p. 727
30. Roemer, M. J., Byington, C. S., Kacprzynski, G. J., Vachtsevanos, G., Goebel, K. In S. B. Johnson, T. J. Gormley, S. S. Kessler, C. D. Mott, A. Patterson-Hine, K. M. Reichard and P. A. Scandura Prognostics, in System Health Management: With Aerospace Applications. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2011, ISBN 978 1 119 99405 3.
31. Shakarishvili, G, Lansang, M. A., Mitta, V., Bornemisza, O., Blakley, M. Kley, N., Burgess, C., Atun, R. Health systems strengthening: a common classification and framework for investmenet analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 2011, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 316–326.
Štítky
Medical assessment Occupational medicineČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Medical Revision
2013 Číslo 4
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Temporary work incompetence
- International comparison of health services and health systems
- Case report to regulation deductions in its overall complexity in 2012
- Principles of modern marketing in medical assessment service