#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Subsegmental pulmonary embolism – diagnosis and clinical significance


Authors: Otto Lang
Authors place of work: Klinika nukleární medicíny, 3. LF UK a FN Královské Vinohrady, Praha 10, ČR
Published in the journal: NuklMed 2021;10:31-37
Category: Review Article

Summary

Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a frequent and potentially fatal diagnosis that is easily missed. Multidetector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has rapidly become the sine qua non for the workup of PE. In the USA, use of CT pulmonary angiography rose 14-fold while VQ scanning decreased by 52% from 2001 to 2008. The high resolution of CT pulmonary angiography makes it possible to detect filling defects in subsegmental arteries. However, there is evidence that some small clots do not need treatment. The significant increase in isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosis by CTPA represented probably a subset of more benign disease, or accurate detection of a natural, benign “clearing” process of the lung vasculature. On the other hand, the risk of major bleeding from anticoagulation was 5.3 % but the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism was only 0.7 %. Another risks of CTPA are nephrotoxic contrast and carcinogenic radiation. To avoid these problems is not simply to do less testing but to test (and subsequently treat) more selectively and to consider alternative tests such as VQ scanning and ultrasonography when appropriate. Clinicians should reserve CT pulmonary angiography for patients at intermediate to high risk of pulmonary embolism based on algorithms that combine clinical probability and D-dimer test results. Implementing policies to use pulmonary scintigraphy as the first line test for pulmonary embolism in stable patients with a normal x ray appearance can reduce use of CT pulmonary angiography and decrease detection of subsegmental pulmonary embolism without increasing deaths from pulmonary embolism.

Keywords:

subsegmental pulmonary embolism – CTPA – lung scintigraphy – diagnosis – Prognosis – treatment


Zdroje
  1. Yoo HHB, Marin FL. Isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism: current therapeutic challenges. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020 Nov 30;130:986-991. doi: 10.20452/pamw.15372.
  2. Hofírek I. Plicní embolizace. Kardiol Rev Int Med 2009, 11: 170-173
  3. Riedel M. Plicní embolie. in: Aschermann M. Kardiologie. Praha: Galén, 2004
  4. Widimský J, Malý J. Akutní plicní embolie a žilní trombóza. Praha: Triton, 2005
  5. Rokyta R, Hutyra M, Jansa P. Doporučené postupy Evropské kardiologické společnosti (ESC) pro diagnostiku a léčbu akutní plicní embolie, verze 2019. Stručný přehled vypracovaný Českou kardiologickou společností. Cor Vasa 2020;62:154–182
  6. Bajc M, Schümichen C, Grüning T et al. EANM guideline for ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and beyond. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019:46, 2429–2451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04450-0
  7. Cuomo JR, Arora V, Wilkins T. Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism With a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34:402-408. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.200308
  8. Moore K, Kunin J, Alnijoumi M et al. Current Endovascular Treatment Options in Acute Pulmonary Embolism. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2021;11:5. doi:10.25259/JCIS_229_2020
  9. Račkauskienė J, Gedvilaitė V, Matačiūnas M et al. Prognostic value of Mastora obstruction score in acute pulmonary embolism. Acta Med Litu. 2019;26:191-198. doi:10.6001/actamedica.v26i4.4203
  10. Moser KM. Venous thromboembolism. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:235-249
  11. Vyas V, Goyal A. Acute Pulmonary Embolism. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; August 10, 2020
  12. Cambron JC, Saba ES, McBane RD et al. Adverse Events and Mortality in Anticoagulated Patients with Different Categories of Pulmonary Embolism. Mayo Clin Proc Inn Qual Out 2020;4:249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.02.002
  13. Mrózek J, Srp V, Novobílský K. Výskyt, diagnostika a léčba plicní embolie na interním oddělení. Část 1. Výskyt a diagnostika. Cor Vasa 2006;48:433–440
  14. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:416–420
  15. Dunn KL, Wolf JP, Dorfman DM, et al. Normal D-dimer levels in emergency department patients suspected of acute pulmonary embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1475–1478
  16. Schoeps UJ, Goldhaber SZ, Costello P. Spiral Computed Tomography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Circulation. 2004;109:2160-2167
  17. Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. When a test is too good: how CT pulmonary angiograms find pulmonary emboli that do not need to be found. BMJ 2013;347:f3368 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3368
  18. Lang O, Kunikova I. Change of collective effective dose of patients examined for suspective pulmonary embolism after introduction of multislice CT (MDCT) into a diagnostic process - single center experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016;43(S1):S527
  19. Schattner A. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography to diagnose acute pulmonary embolism: the good, the bad, and the ugly: comment on „The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism“. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1966-1968. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.400
  20. Hall WB, Truitt SG, Scheunemann LP, et al. The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1961-1965. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.360
  21. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al; PIOPED II Investigators. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2317-2327
  22. Freeman LM. Don‘t Bury the V/Q Scan: It‘s as Good as Multidetector CT Angiograms with a Lot Less Radiation Exposure. J Nucl Med 2008;49:5-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.048066
  23. Tetalman MR, Hoffer PB, Heck LL, et al. Perfusion lung scan in normal volunteers. Radiology. 1973;106:593–594
  24. Carrier M, Righini M, Wells PS, et al. Subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography: incidence and clinical implications. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management outcome studies. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 1716–1722
  25. Raskob GE. Importance of subsegmental pulmonary embolism. Blood 2013;122:1094-1095
  26. Anderson DR, Kahn SR, Rodger MA et al. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007;298:2743-2753
  27. Wysowski DK, Nourjah P, Swartz L. Bleeding complications with warfarin use: a prevalent adverse effect resulting in regulatory action. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1414-1419
  28. Donato AA, Khoche S, Santora J, Wagner B. Clinical outcomes in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli diagnosed by multidetector CT pulmonary angiography. Thromb Res 2010;126:e266-270
  29. Kelly J, Hunt BJ. Do anticoagulants improve survival in patients presenting with venous thromboembolism? J Intern Med Dec 2003;254:527–539
  30. Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:831-837
  31. Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008;248:254-263
  32. Lang O. Radionuklidové metody v diagnostice plicní embolie. Kardiol prax 2006;4:168-172
  33. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2078-2086
  34. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopolan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007;298:317–323
  35. Iribarren C, Hlatky MA, Chandra M, et al. Incidental pulmonary nodules on cardiac computed tomography: prognosis and use. Am J Med. 2008;121:989-996. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.05.040
  36. Gómez-Sánchez MA. What is the clinical significance of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism? Rev Port Pneumol 2014;20:179---180
  37. Moores LK, Jackson WL, Shorr AF et al. Meta-analysis: outcomes in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism managed with computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:866–874
  38. García-Sanz MT, Pena-Álvarez C, López-Landeiro P et al. Symptoms, location and prognosis of pulmonary embolism. Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia 2014;20:194-199
  39. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Ginsberg JS et al. A noninvasive strategy for the treatment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:289–297
  40. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:997–1005.
  41. Goodman LR. Small pulmonary emboli: what do we know? Radiology 2005;234:654–658
  42. Le Roux PY, Palard X, Robin P et al. Safety of ventilation/perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014;41:1957–1964. DOI 10.1007/s00259-014-2763-1
Štítky
Nuclear medicine Radiodiagnostics Radiotherapy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#