Bonebridge – The New Active Direct-drive Bone Conduction Hearing Implant
Authors:
B. Gál
; T. Talach; M. Veselý; J. Rottenberg; P. Urbánková
; P. Smilek; R. Kostřica; J. Hložek
Authors place of work:
Klinika otorinolaryngologie a chirurgie hlavy a krku, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity a Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně
Published in the journal:
Otorinolaryngol Foniatr, 67, 2018, No. 2, pp. 50-55.
Category:
Original Article
Summary
Objective:
Implantable systems for direct bone conduction have been designed for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss for whom other treatments do not bring a sufficient benefit or are contraindicated. The objective of this article is to present the first experience with a new active implantable system for direct bone conduction – BonebridgeTM.
Material and methodology:
Bonebridge is the first system for direct bone conduction using an active implant by which vibrations are generated inside the temporal bone. The system consists of an external audioprocessor and internal bone implant. The implanted part is composed of a receiving coil, a demodulator and source of vibrations (a transducer). The transducer is implanted into the bone bed and fixed by two cortical screws. Preoperatively, HRCT of the temporal bone is typically performed and special software is used to create a 3D model of the operating field. The surgeon is thus able to ensure a safe placement of the implant with preservation surrounding anatomical structures. The first-choice surgical approach is transmastoid implantation. A retrosigmoid approach is alternatively chosen in case of difficult anatomy.
Results:
Bonebridge, was used in four patients between 2014 and 2017. The first implantation of the Bonebridge system in the Czech Republic was performed in August 2014, in a patient with Treacher-Collins syndrome. Other cases included a patient with acquired atresia of the auditory canals, a patient after repeated middle ear reconstructions, and a patient with chronic mesotympanic otitis and recurrent otorrhoea, for whom there were no other surgical options. The transmastoid approach was used in three whereas the retrosigmoid in one patient. No complications occurred in any of the patients. All patients report very good effect in everyday communication, as well as significant improvement in audiology results.
Conclusion:
The direct bone conduction with an active implant system, Bonebridge, is a modern, patient-friendly, audiologically effective, and safe treatment method that eliminates some of the shortcomings of other passive implantable systems.
Keywords:
bone conduction hearing, conductive hearing loss, mixed hearing loss, single sided deafness, Bonebridge, bone conduction implant
Zdroje
1. Barbara, M., Perotti, M., Gioia, B. et al.: Transcutaneous bone- conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol., 133, 2014, 10, s. 1058-1064.
2. Bianchin, G., Bonali, M., Russo, M. et al.: Active bone conduction system: outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous device. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec., 77. 2015, 1, s. 17-26.
3. Canis, M., Ihler, F., Blum, J. et al.: CT-assisted navigation for retrosigmoidal implantation of the Bonebridge. HNO, 61, 2013, 12, s. 1038-1044.
4. Doshi, J., McDermott, A. L.: Bone anchored hearing aids in children. Expert Rev. Med. Devices, 12, 2015, 1, s. 73-82.
5. Fan, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P. et al.: Aesthetic and hearing rehabilitation in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol., 2017, 101, s. 150-157.
6. Gerdes, T., Salcher, R. B., Schwab, B. et al.: Comparison of audiological results between a transcutaneous and a percutaneous bone conduction instrument in conductive hearing loss. Otol. Neurootol., 37, 2016, 6, s. 685-691.
7. Guldner, C., Heinrichs, J., Weiss, R. et al.: Visualisation of the Bonebridge by means of CT and CBCT. Eur. . Med. Res., 2013, 3, s..18-30.
8. Hassepass, F., Bulla, S., Aschendorff, A. et al.: The bonebridge as a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system: preliminary surgical and audiological results in children and adolescents. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 272. 2015, 9, s. 2235-2241.
9. Cho, B., Matsumoto, N., Mori M. et al.: Image-guided placement of the Bonebridge without surgical navigation equipmet. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., 9, 2014, 5, s. 845-855.
10. Lassaletta, L., Calvino, M., Zernotti, M. et al.: Postoperative pain in patients undergoing a transcutaneous active bone conduction implant (Bonebridge). Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 273, 2016, 12, s. 4103-4110.
11. Law, E. K., Bhatia, K. S., Tsang, W. S. et al.: CT pre-operative planning of a new semi-implantable bone conduction hearing device. Eur. Radiol., 26. 2016, 6, s. 1686-1695.
12. Manrique, M., Sanhueza, I., Manrique, R. et al.: A new bone conduction implant: surgical technique and results. Otol. Neurotik., 35, 2014, 2, s. 216-220.
13. Matsumoto, N., Takumi, Y., Cho, B. et al.: Template-guided implantation of the Bonebridge: clinical experience. Eu. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 272. 2015, 12, s. 3669-3675.
14. Mukherjee, P., Cheng, K., Flanagan, S. et al.: Utility of 3D printed temporal bones in pre-surgical planning for complex BoneBridge cases. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 274, 2017, 8, s. 3021-3028.
15. Plontke, S. K., Radetzki, F., Seiwerth, I. et al.: Individual computer-assisted 3D planning for surgical placement of a new bone conduction hearing device. Otol. Neurotol., 35. 2014, 7, s. 1251-1257.
16. Riss, D., Arnoldner, C., Baumgartner, W. D. et al.: Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone- conduction implant. Laryngoscope, 124, 2014, 12, s. 2802-2806.
17. Sprinzl, G. M., Lenarz, T., Ernst, A. et al.: First European multicenter results with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant system: short-term safety and efficacy. Otol. Neurotik., 34, 2013, 6, s. 1076-1083.
18. Sprinzl, G. M., Wolf-Magele, A.: The Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature. Clin. Otolaryngol., 41. 2016, 2, s. 131-143.
19. Schilde, S., Plontke, S. K., Rahne, T. A: Three-dimensional geometric-morphometric study to quantify temporal bone growth and its consequences for the success of implanting bone anchored hearing devices. Otol. Neurotol., 38, 2017, 5, s. 721-729.
20. Schmerber, S., Deguine, O., Marx, M. et al.: Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 274, 2017, 4, s. 1835-1851.
21. Steinmetz, C., Mader, I., Arndt, S. et al.:. MRI artefacts after Bonebridge implantation. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 271, 2014, 7, s. 2079-2082.
22. Weiss, R., Leinung, M., Baumann, U. et al.: Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 274. 2017, 5, s. 2107-2115.
23. Zernotti, M. E., Sarasty, A. B.: Active bone conduction prosthesis: Bonebridge. Int. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 19, 2015, 4, s. 343-348.
Štítky
Audiology Paediatric ENT ENT (Otorhinolaryngology)Článok vyšiel v časopise
Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics
2018 Číslo 2
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Cysts Originating from Cervical Lymphatic Ducts
- The Closure of Nasal Septal Perforation by Custom Made Septal Obturators - First Experiences
- The Hypopharyngeal Reflux in Double-pH/Z Does Not Correlate with the Reflux Finding Score in Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
- Posterior Glottic Stenosis