Sexual function sparing radical cystectomy
Authors:
R. Zachoval; M. Záleský; V. Vik; J. Jarabák
Published in the journal:
Urol List 2008; 6(2): 36-47
Summary
The aim of this work is to review all published papers regarding sexual functions sparing cystectomy.
We reviewed all articles in English language identified in Medline database, under key words: sexual, potency, erection, ejaculation, ejaculatory, sparing and cystectomy published until 2007. All data were fully analysed.
The potency is preserved in 17–100 % of patients who underwent nerve sparing radical cystectomy. The preservation of potency is decreasing in patients in age group of 60–65 years and more and in those who underwent urethrectomy or unilateral procedure. The daily continence is preserved in 80–100 %, night continence in 47–75 % of patients. The potency rate of 80–100 % is observed in those patients, where vas deferens, seminal vesicles and part of the prostate were preserved. There is 79–100 % rate of day continence and 31–100 % rate of night continence. In those cases where cord, seminal vesicles and whole prostate were preserved the potency rate is 70–100 % and antegrade ejaculation is observed in 50 % of patients. In these patients daily continence is 95–100 %, and night continence is 74–88 %. Furthermore, we focused on other relevant details in our paper: number and characteristics of patients, period of recruitment, oncological indications and results, surgical methods of nerve sparing cystectomy, operating times and follow-up of the patients.
It is clear from the published data, that the surgical techniques have made a great progress in the last ten years, and there is a big chance of preservation of sexual functions after radical cystectomy in male patients. Mostly younger patients with favourable oncological characteristics of the tumour could benefit from this kind of surgery. More precise indication criteria will have to be defined.
Key words:
radical cystectomy, sparing, sexual function, erection, ejaculation
Zdroje
1. Colombo R, Bertini R, Salonia A et al. Overall clinical outcomes after nerve and seminal sparing radical cystectomy for the treatment of organ confined bladder cancer. J Urol 2004; 171(5): 1819–1822.
2. Spitz A, Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Skinner DG. Orthotopic urinary diversion with preservation of erectile and ejaculatory function in men requiring radical cystectomy for nonurothelial malignancy: a new technique. J Urol 1999; 161(6): 1761–1764.
3. Walsh PC, Mostwin JL. Radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy with preservation of potency. Result using a new nerve-sparing technique. Br J Urol 1984; 56(6): 694–697.
4. Walsh PC, Schlegel PN. Radical pelvic surgery with preservation of sexual function. Ann Surg 1988; 208(4): 391–400.
5. Brendler CB et al. Local recurrence and survival following nerve sparing radical cystoprostatectomy. J Urol 1990; 144(5): 1137–1140.
6. Marshall FF et al. Ileocolic neobladder post-cystectomy: continence and potency. J Urol 1991; 145(3): 502–504.
7. Ramon J, Leandri P, Rossignol G, Gautier JR. Preservation of urinary continence and potency after cystoprostatectomy. Prog Clin Biol Res 1992; 378: 125–132.
8. Thomas PJ, Nurse DE, Deliveliotis C, Mundy AR. Cystoprostatectomy and substitution cystoplasty for locally invasive bladder cancer. Br J Urol 1992; 70(1): 40–42.
9. Tomiæ R, Sjödin JG. Sexual function in men after radical cystectomy with or without urethrectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1992; 26(2): 127–129.
10. Arai Y, Yoshida O. En bloc radical cystoprostatourethrectomy with preservation of sexual function. Int J Urol 1995; 2(4): 249–251.
11. Kihara T, Kageyama Y, Kitahara S et al. En bloc cystourethrectomy with preservation of potency. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 1996; 87(3): 676–681.
12. Schoenberg MP, Walsh PC, Breazeale DR et al. Local recurrence and survival following nerve sparing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer: 10 years follow up. J Urol 1996; 155(2): 490–494.
13. Chiang PH, Wu WJ, Chiang CP. Nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy: 3-year experience. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 1997; 13(3): 169–174.
14. Venn SN, Popert RM, Mundy AR. Nerve sparing cystectomy and substitution cystoplasty in patiens of either sex. Limitations and techniques. Br J Urol 1998; 82: 361–365.
15. Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Perimenis P et al. Attempted nerve sparing surgery and age have a significant effect on urinary continence and erectile function after radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal orthotopic bladder substitution. J Urol 2004; 172: 1323–1327.
16. Zippe CD et al. Sexual function after male radical cystectomy in a sexually active population. Urology 2004, 64(4): 682–686.
17. Gallo L, Perdona S, Autorino R et al. Recovery of erection after pelvic urologic surgery: our experience. Int J Import 2005; 17(6): 484–493.
18. Kinoshita H, Sato Y, Chizaki R et al. Experience of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical cystectomy and construction of ileal neobladder at Kansas Medical University. Hinyokika Kiyo 2006; 52(3): 231–234.
19. Lane BR, Finelli A, Moinzadeh A et al. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical cystectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Urology 2006, 68(4): 778–783.
20. Wang YM, Luo JD, Yang GS et al. Sexual nerve-sparing radical cystectomy: experience with 32 cases. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2006; 12(11): 1014–1015.
21. Kitamura T, Moriyama N, Shibamoto K et al. Urethrectomy is harmful for preserving potency after radical cystectomy. Urol Int 1987; 42(5): 375–379.
22. Koraitim M, Khalil R. Preservation of urosexual function after radical cystectomy. Urology 1992; 39(2): 117–121.
23. Rocca Rossetti S, Terrone C. Preservation of potency by supra-ampullar cystectomy in patients with bladder neoplasms. Arch Ital Urol Androl 1999; 71(4): 265–268.
24. Wunderlich H, Wolf M, Reichel O et al. Radical cystectomy with ultrasound-guided partial prostatectomy for bladder cancer: a complication-preventing concept. Urology 2006; 68(3): 554–559.
25. Colombo R, Bertini R, Salonia A et al. Nerve and seminal sparing radical cystectomy with orthotopic urinary diversion in select patients with superficial bladder cancer: an innovative surgical approach. J Urol 2001; 165(1): 51–55.
26. Ghanem AN. Experience with capsule sparing cystoprostatectomy for orthotopic bladder replacement: overcoming the probleme of impotence, incontinence and diffucult urethral anastomosis. BJU Int 2002; 90: 617–620.
27. Vallencien G, Abou El-Fettouh H, Cathelineau X et al. Cystectomy with prostate sparing for bladder cancer in 100 patients: 10-year experience. J Urol 2002; 168(6): 2413–2417.
28. Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Colombo R et al. Laparoscopic nerve- and seminal- sparing cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder: The first three cases. Eur Urol 2003; 44(5): 567–572.
29. Zhou FJ, Qin ZK, Han H et al. Radical cystectomy with sparing partial prostate for invasive bladder cancer. Ai Zheng 2003; 22(10): 1066–1069.
30. Botto H, Sebe P, Molinie V et al. Prostatic capsule- and seminal-sparing cystectomy for bladder carcinoma: initial results for selected patiens. BJU Int 2004; 94(7): 1021–1025.
31. Muto G, Bardari F, D´Urso L, Liona C. Seminal sparing cystectomy and ileo-capsuloplasty: long-term follow-up result. J Urol 2004; 172(1): 76–80.
32. Saidi A, Nahon O, Daniel L et al. Cystectomie et conservation prostatique: résultats fonction-nels et carcinologiques a long terme. A propos de 25 cas. Progres en Urologie 2004; 14(2): 172–177.
33. Terrone C, Fracci C, Scarpa RM et al. Supra-ampullar cystectomy with preservation of sexual function and ileal orthotopic reservoir for bladder tumor: twenty years of experience. Eur Urol 2004; 46(2): 264–270.
34. Martis G, D´Elia G, Diana M et al. Prostatic capsule- and nerve-sparing cystectomy in organ-confined bladder cancer: preliminary results. World J Surg 2005; 29(10): 1277–1281.
35. Girgin C, Oder M, Sezer A et al. Erection- and ejaculation-preserving cystectomy with orthotopic urinary diversion: is it feasible? J Androl 2006; 27(2): 263–267.
36. Rozet F, Hormon J, Barret E et al. Benefits of laparoscopic prostate-sparing radical cystec-tomy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2006; 6(1): 21–26.
37. Terrone C, Porpoglia F, Cracco C et al. Supra-ampullar cystectomy and ileal neobladder. Eur Urol 2006; 50(6): 1223–1233.
38. Davila HH, Weber T, Burday D et al. Total or partial prostate sparing cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: long-term implications on erectile function. BJU Int 2007; 100(5): 1026–1029.
39. Horenblas S, Meinhardt W, Ijzerman W et al. Sexuality preserving cystectomy and neobladder: initial results. J Urol 2001; 166(3): 837–840.
40. Meinhardt W, Horenblas S. Sexuality preserving cystectomy and neobladder (SPCN): functional results of a neobladder anastomosed to the prostate. Eur Urol 2003; 43(6): 646–650.
41. Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Meinhardt W, Horenblas S. Clinical outcomes after sexuality preserving cystectomy and neobladder (prostate sparing cystectomy) in 44 patients. J Urol 2005, 173(4): 1314–1317.
42. Salem HK. Preservation of ejakulatory and erectile function after radical cystectomy for urothelial malignancy. J Egypt Natl Canc Ints 2005; 17(4): 239–244.
43. Salem HK. Radical cystectomy with preservation of sexual function and fertility in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: new technique. Int J Urol 2007, 14(4): 294–298.
Štítky
Paediatric urologist UrologyČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Urological Journal
2008 Číslo 2
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Non-invasive blader cancer carcinoma – when should we start adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy and what to do in case of failure?
- Urinary diversion after cystectomy
- Complications of cystectomy and urinary diversion
- Sexual function sparing radical cystectomy