CURRENT STATUS OF ROBOTIC AND LAPAROSCOPIC UROLOGIC SURGERY IN THE UNITED STATES
Authors:
R. Abaza
Authors place of work:
Director, Robotic Urologic Surgery, Department of Urology, Ohio State University Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital & Solove Research Institute
Published in the journal:
Urol List 2009; 7(4): 36-38
Summary
Minimally-invasive urologic surgery has potential benefits for patients whether performed laparoscopically or in robot-assisted fashion. Laparoscopic techniques require specialized training to overcome limitations that robotics has attempted to address. This may explain the rapid adoption of robotic surgery among urologists in the U.S., particularly for prostate cancer, in contrast with standard laparoscopy. Current trends in resident training in laparoscopy and robotics in the U.S. may have implications for the landscape of minimally-invasive urology in the future.
Key words:
laparoscopy, robotics, surgical education, treatment
Zdroje
1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: Initial case report. J Urol 1991; 146(2): 278–282.
2. Novick AC. Laparoscopic and Partial Nephrectomy. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 6322S–6327S.
3. Miller DC, Taub DA, Dunn RL et al. Laparoscopy for renal cell carcinoma: diffusion versus regionalization? J Urol 2006; 176(3): 1102–1106.
4. Kim HL, Hollowell CM, Patel RV et al. Use of new technology in endourology and laparoscopy by American urologists: internet and postal survey. Urology 2000; 56(5): 760–765.
5. Wang DS, Winfield HN. Survey of urological laparoscopic practice patterns in the Midwest. J Urol 2004; 172: 2282–2286.
6. Shay BF, Thomas R, Monga M. Urology practice patterns after residency training in laparoscopy. J Endourol 2002; 16(4): 251–256.
7. Abdelshehid CS, Eichel L, Lee D et al. Current Trends in Urologic Laparoscopic Surgery. J Endourol 2005; 19(1): 15–20.
8. Duchene DA, Moinzadeh A, Gill IS et al. Survey of Residency Training in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery. J Urol 2006; 176(5): 2158–2166.
9. See WA, Cooper CS, Fisher RJ. Predictors of laparoscopic complications after formal training in laparoscopic surgery. JAMA 1993; 270(22): 2689–2692.
10. Kercher KW, Heniford BT, Matthews BD et al. Laparoscopic vs open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(12): 1889–1895.
11. Crothers IR, Gallagher AG, McClure N et al. Experienced laparoscopic surgeons are automated to the "fulcrum effect": an ergonomic demonstration. Endoscopy 1999; 31(5): 365–369.
12. Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E et al. Three-dimensional laparoscopy: Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1999; 13(5): 469–472.
13. Ahlering TE. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2004; 1(2): 58–59.
14. Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques.J Urol 2004; 172: 1431–1435.
15. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic. Urology 2005; 66 (5 Suppl): 101–104.
16. Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001; 165: 1964–1966.
17. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002; 60(5): 864–868.
18. Thiel DD, Winfield HN. Robotics in Urology: Past, Present, and Future. J Endourol 2008; 22(4): 825–830.
19. Advincula AP, Song A. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19(4): 331–336.
20. Rodriguez E, Chitwood WR Jr. Minimally invasive, robotic cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85(4): 1460–1462.
21. Martinez B. Robotics in vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 2004; 18(5): 619–620.
22. Hazey JW, Melvin WS. Robot-assisted general surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 2004; 11(2): 107–112.
23. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.website, <http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/index.aspx>, Oct 2008
Štítky
Paediatric urologist UrologyČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Urological Journal
2009 Číslo 4
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Intraoperational course, early complications and functional outcome in robotic-assisted AND OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY – A COMPARISON
- SURGICAL ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE & PELVIC FLOOR FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY & RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: CRITICAL POINTS FOR ACHIEVING THE TRIFECTA OF ONCOLOGIC SAFETY, URINARY CONTROL, AND ERECTILE FUNCTION
- ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOMES
- TRANSITION OF WHOLE GLAND CRYOSURGERY TO FOCAL CRYOABLATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF EARLY STAGE LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER