#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

The social genome: Current findings and implications for the study of human genetics


article has not abstract


Vyšlo v časopise: The social genome: Current findings and implications for the study of human genetics. PLoS Genet 13(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006615
Kategorie: Perspective
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006615

Souhrn

article has not abstract


Zdroje

1. Polderman TJ, Benyamin B, De Leeuw CA, Sullivan PF, Van Bochoven A, Visscher PM, et al. Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nat Genet. 2015;47: 702–709. doi: 10.1038/ng.3285 25985137

2. Khoury MJ, Wacholder S. Invited Commentary: From Genome-Wide Association Studies to Gene-Environment-Wide Interaction Studies-025EFChallenges and Opportunities. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169: 227–230. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn351 19022826

3. Boardman JD, Daw J, Freese J. Defining the environment in gene–environment research: lessons from social epidemiology. Am J Public Health. 2013;103: S64–S72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301355 23927514

4. Baud A, Mulligan M, Casale F, Ingels J, Bohl C, Callebert J, et al. Genetic variation in the social environment contributes to health and disease. PLoS Genet 13(1): e1006498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006498 28121987

5. Wolf JB, Brodie ED III, Cheverud JM, Moore AJ, Wade MJ. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998;13: 64–69. 21238202

6. Moore AJ, Brodie ED III, Wolf JB. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution. 1997;51: 1352–1362.

7. Champagne FA, Meaney MJ. Stress during gestation alters postpartum maternal care and the development of the offspring in a rodent model. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59: 1227–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.016 16457784

8. Petfield D, Chenoweth SF, Rundle HD, Blows MW. Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102: 6045–6050. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409378102 15840726

9. Bergsma R, Kanis E, Knol EF, Bijma P. The contribution of social effects to heritable variation in finishing traits of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Genetics. 2008;178: 1559–1570. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.084236 18245326

10. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years. N Engl J Med. 2007;357: 370–379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa066082 17652652

11. Cohen-Cole E, Fletcher JM. Is obesity contagious? Social networks vs. environmental factors in the obesity epidemic. J Health Econ. 2008;27: 1382–1387. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.04.005 18571258

12. VanderWeele TJ. Sensitivity Analysis for Contagion Effects in Social Networks. Sociol Methods Res. 2011;40: 240–255. doi: 10.1177/0049124111404821 25580037

13. Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Sterne JA, Timpson N, Davey Smith G. Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat Med. 2008;27: 1133–1163. doi: 10.1002/sim.3034 17886233

14. Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Anttila V, Gusev A, Day FR, Loh P-R, et al. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet. 2015;47: 1236–1241. doi: 10.1038/ng.3406 26414676

15. Barban N, Jansen R, de Vlaming R, Vaez A, Mandemakers JJ, Tropf FC, et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies 12 loci influencing human reproductive behavior. Nat Genet. 2016;48: 1462–1472. doi: 10.1038/ng.3698 27798627

16. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001; 415–444.

17. Centola D. The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment. Science. 2010;329: 1194–1197. doi: 10.1126/science.1185231 20813952

18. Conley D, Laidley T, Belsky D, Fletcher J, Boardman J, Domingue B. Assortative mating and differential fertility by phenotype and genotype across the 20th century. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016; 24: 6647–6652.

19. Domingue BW, Fletcher J, Conley D, Boardman JD. Genetic and educational assortative mating among US adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111: 7996–8000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321426111 24843128

20. House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science. 1988;241: 540–545. 3399889

21. Belsky DW, Moffitt TE, Corcoran DL, Domingue B, Harrington H, Hogan S, et al. The Genetics of Success: How Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated With Educational Attainment Relate to Life-Course Development. Psychol Sci. 2016;27: 957–972. doi: 10.1177/0956797616643070 27251486

22. Snyder-Mackler N, Sanz J, Kohn JN, Brinkworth JF, Morrow S, Shaver AO, et al. Social status alters immune regulation and response to infection in macaques. Science. 2016;354: 1041–1045. doi: 10.1126/science.aah3580 27885030

23. Granovetter MS. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973; 1360–1380.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2017 Číslo 3
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#