Soft Targets: Nurses and the Pharmaceutical Industry
article has not abstract
Vyšlo v časopise:
Soft Targets: Nurses and the Pharmaceutical Industry. PLoS Med 5(2): e5. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050005
Kategorie:
Policy Forum
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050005
Souhrn
article has not abstract
Zdroje
1. Nursing Standard
2007
‘Special projects’ sponsorship.
Available: http://www.nursing-standard.co.uk/advertising/specprods.asp. Accessed 27 December 2007
2. BurnsD
2002
Nurse prescribing. Nurses' influence on GPs' prescribing.
Nurs Times
98
41
42
3. MansfieldPRMintzesBRichardsDToopL
2005
Direct to consumer advertising.
BMJ
330
5
6
4. MansfieldPRMintzesB
2003
Direct-to-consumer advertising is more profitable if it is misleading.
N Z Med J
116
U610
5. MintzesBBarerMLKravitzRLKazanjianABassettK
2002
Influence of direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising and patients' requests on prescribing decisions: two site cross sectional survey.
BMJ
324
278
279
6. HealyD
2006
The latest mania: Selling bipolar disorder.
PLoS Med
3
e185
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030185
7. WazanaA
2000
Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry. Is a gift ever just a gift.
JAMA
283
373
380
8. SmithR
2003
Medical journals and pharmaceutical companies: uneasy bedfellows.
BMJ
326
1202
1205
9. SmithR
2002
Making progress with competing interests—still some way to go.
BMJ
325
1375
1376
10. BakerCJohnsrudMTCrismonMRosenheckRAWoodsSW
2003
Quantitative analysis of sponsorship bias in economic studies of antidepressants.
Br J Psychiatry
183
498
506
11. BoydEABeroLA
2000
Assessing faculty financial relationships with industry: a case study.
JAMA
284
2209
2214
12. LexchinJBeroLADjulbegovicBClarkO
2003
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.
BMJ
326
1167
1176
13. MoncrieffJHopkerSThomasP
2005
Psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry: who pays the piper.
Psych Bull
29
84
85
14. PerlisRHPerlisCSWuYHwangCJosephM
2005
Industry sponsorship and financial conflict of interest in the reporting of clinical trials in psychiatry.
Am J Psychiatry
162
1957
1960
15. WagerE
2003
How to dance with porcupines: rules and guidelines on doctors' relations with drug companies.
BMJ
326
1196
1198
16. GøtzschePCHróbjartssonAJohansenHKHaahrMTAltmanDG
2007
Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials.
PLoS Med
4
e19
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040019
17. MenkesDB
2006
Psychiatrist subscribing preferences and attitudes toward promotion.
Inaugural Conference on Disease-Mongering; 11–13 April 2006; Newcastle, Australia
18. AshmoreRCarverN
2001
The pharmaceutical industry and mental health nursing.
Br J Nurs
10
1396
1402
19. MahonS
2006
Impact of direct-to-consumer advertising on healthcare providers and consumers.
Clin J Oncol Nurs
10
417
420
20. VialePH
2003
What nurse practitioners should know about direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications.
J Am Acad Nurse Pract
15
297
304
21. InlanderC
1991
A hard pill to swallow. Advertising prescription drugs directly to the consumer.
Nurs Econ
9
343
347
22. GruberWLlewelynJArrasCLionS
1995
The role of the pharmaceutical industry in promoting patient education.
Patient Educ Couns
26
245
249
23. VialePH
2002
Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications: implications for patients with cancer.
Oncol Nurs Forum
29
505
513
24. VialePHYamamotoDS
2004
The attitudes and beliefs of oncology nurse practitioners regarding direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications.
Oncol Nurs Forum
31
777
783
25. BowronA
2006
Bridging the information gap in primary care.
Community Pract
79
242
26. DaviesJHemingwayS
2006
Pharmaceutical influences: nurse prescribers: eyes wide open.
Nurse Prescr
1
e42
27. DeSiletsLD
2006
Commercial support for professional development.
J Contin Educ Nurs
37
52
53
28. EdmundsM
2004
Confusing ethical guidelines dampen pharmaceutical support.
Nurse Pract
29
16
29. FlewellMN
2006
Pharmaceutical sales reps: Value beyond samples.
Adv Nurse Pract
14
18
30. HallJCantrillJNoyceP
2003
The information sources used by community nurse prescribers.
Br J Nurs
12
810
818
31. KessenichCRWestbrookMH
1999
Pharmaceutical companies and the prescriptive practices of nurse practitioners.
J Am Acad Nurse Pract
11
533
538
32. MonaghanMSGaltKATurnerPDHoughtonBLRichEC
2003
Student understanding of the relationship between the health professions and the pharmaceutical industry.
Teaching and learning in medicine
15
14
20
33. NolanPCarrNDoranM
2004
Nurse prescribing: The experiences of psychiatric nurses in the United States.
Nurs Stand
18
33
38
34. YoungM
2006
They are more than just pretty people handing out cool pens.
Dermatol Nurs
18
323
324
35. KleinCA
2006
Dispensing pharmaceutical samples: A few reminders.
Nurse Pract
31
15
36. Alexander-BanysB
2002
Pharmaceutical company advertising practices: Call to arms.
J Pediatr Health Care
16
49
50
37. SidiqiSEdmundsM
2003
Pharmaceutical influence.
Nurse Pract
28
6
7
38. EdmundsM
2003
Response to Sidiqi.
Nurse Pract
28
7
39. O'MalleyP
2006
Pharmaceutical advertising and clinical nurse specialist practice.
Clin Nurse Spec
20
13
15
40. AshmoreRCarverNBanksD
2007
Mental health nursing students' relationships with the pharmaceutical industry.
Nurse Educ Today
27
551
560
41. WillisJ
1997
The drug squad.
Nurs Times
93
36
38
42. DayL
2006
Industry gifts to healthcare providers: are the concerns serious.
Am J Crit Care
5
510
513
43. LieferD
1997
Warning over drug courses.
Nurs Stand
11
9
44. KmietowiczZ
2004
Drug company influence extends to nurses, pharmacists and patient groups.
BMJ
329
1206
45. CriggerNJBennisonJW
2006
Unethical marketing or business as usual.
Adv Nurse Pract
15
61
68
46. HemingwayS
2003
Mental health nursing and the pharmaceutical industry.
Ment Health Pract
7
22
23
47. CastledineG
2003
Nurses must be immune to product promotions.
Br J Nurs
12
827
48. StokamerCI
2003
Pharmaceutical gift giving: Analysis of an ethical dilemma.
J Nurs Adm
33
48
51
49. CriggerNJ
2005
Pharmaceutical promotions and conflict of interest in nurse practitioner's decision making: The undiscovered country.
J Am Acad Nurse Pract
17
207
212
50. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
2007
Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication.
Available: http://www.icmje.org/index.html. Accessed 27 December 2007
51. MansfieldPRLexchinJWenLSGrandoriLMcCoyCP
2006
Educating health professionals about drug and device promotion: Advocates' recommendations.
PLoS Med
3
e451
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030451
52. MenkesDB
2006
Calling the piper's tune.
Prim Care Clin Psychiatry
11
147
149
53. CardarelliRLicciardoneJCTaylorLG
2006
A cross-sectional evidence-based review of pharmaceutical promotional marketing brochures and their underlying studies: is what they tell us important and true.
BMC Fam Pract
7
13
54. ZieglerMLewPSingerB
1995
The accuracy of drug information from pharmaceutical sales representatives.
JAMA
273
1296
1298
55. CooperRJSchrigerDLWallaceRCMikulichVJWilkesMS
2003
The quantity and quality of scientific graphs in pharmaceutical advertisements.
J Gen Intern Med
18
294
297
56. KaphingstKADeJongW
2004
Market watch: The educational potential of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising.
Health Aff
23
143
150
57. MadhavanSAmonkarMMElliotDBurkeKGoreP
1997
The gift relationship between pharmaceutical companies and physicians: an exploratory survey of physicians.
J Clin Pharm Ther
22
207
215
58. SteinmanMShlipakMMcPheeSJ
2001
Of principles and pens; attitudes and practices of medicine house staff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions.
Am J Med
551
557
59. WatkinsRSKimberlyJJr
2004
What residents don't know about physician-pharmaceutical industry interactions.
Acad Med
79
432
437
60. EmanuelEJEmanuelLL
1992
Four models of the physician-patient relationship.
JAMA
267
2221
2226
61. MansfieldPR
2007
Is it insulting to suggest that health professionals are influenced by drug companies.
Available: http://www.healthyskepticism.org/news/2007/May.php. Accessed 27 December 2007
62. Stanford University
2006
Policy and guidelines for interactions between the Stanford University School of Medicine, the Stanford Hospital and Clinics and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital with the pharmaceutical, bioetch, medical device, and hospital and research and supplies industries (“Industry”).
Available: http://med.stanford.edu/coi/siip/documents/siip_policy_aug06. pdf. Accessed 27 December 2007
63. JonesM
2004
Case Report. Nurse prescribing, a case study in policy influence.
Journal of nursing management
12
266
272
64. MittmanDEYackerenTFHendrixPMirotznikHG
1994
Sales reps recognize value of nurse practitioners.
Med Mark Media
29
52
54
65. ArnoldM
2004
The hidden prescribers.
Med Mark Media
39
44
52
66. WhileAEBiggsKS
2004
Benefits and challenges of nurse prescribing.
J Adv Nurs
45
559
567
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2008 Číslo 2
- Statinová intolerance
- Hydroresponzivní krytí v epitelizační fázi hojení rány
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
- Metamizol v liečbe pooperačnej bolesti u detí do 6 rokov veku
- Co dělat při intoleranci statinů?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Eliminating Human African Trypanosomiasis: Where Do We Stand and What Comes Next?
- Solving the Mystery of Myelodysplasia
- The Neglected Diseases Section in : Moving Beyond Tropical Infections
- Should Data from Demographic Surveillance Systems Be Made More Widely Available to Researchers?