Preventing Bias in Cluster Randomised Trials

1. CampbellDT

1957 Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychol Bull 54 297 312

2. GreenS

HigginsJ

2005 Glossary. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.5. Available: http://www.cochrane.org/resources/glossary.htm. Accessed 23 March 2009

3. FisherLD

DixonDO

HersonJ

FrankowskiRK

HearonMS

1990 Intention to treat in clinical trials.

PearceKE

Statistical issues in drug research and development New York Marcel Dekker 331 350

4. HollisS

CampbellF

1999 What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 319 670 674

5. LachinJM

2000 Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Control Clin Trials 21 167 189

6. DonnerA

KlarN

2000 Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials London Arnold 178

7. MurrayDM

1998 Design and analysis of group-randomized trials New York Oxford University Press 467

8. PufferS

TorgersonD

WatsonJ

2003 Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: Review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. BMJ 327 785 789

9. UkoumunneOC

GullifordMC

ChinnS

SterneJA

BurneyPG

1999 Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: A systematic review. Health Technol Assess 3 iii-92

10. BlandJM

2004 Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: Two bibliometric surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol 4 21

11. CampbellMK

ElbourneDR

AltmanDG

2004 CONSORT statement: Extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 328 702 708

12. EdwardsSJ

BraunholtzDA

LilfordRJ

StevensAJ

1999 Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials. BMJ 318 1407 1409

13. ElbourneDR

CampbellMK

2001 Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: For discussion. Stat Med 20 489 496

14. CampbellMJ

2000 Cluster randomized trials in general (family) practice research. Stat Methods Med Res 9 81 94

15. FarrinA

RussellI

TorgersonD

UnderwoodM

2005 Differential recruitment in a cluster randomized trial in primary care: The experience of the UK back pain, exercise, active management and manipulation (UK BEAM) feasibility study. Clin Trials 2 119 124

16. EldridgeS

AshbyD

BennettC

WakelinM

FederG

2008 Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: Systematic review of recent trials. BMJ 336 876 880

17. TaljaardM

DonnerA

KlarN

2008 Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials. Biom J 50 329 345

18. HunsbergerS

MurrayD

DavisCE

FabsitzRR

2001 Imputation strategies for missing data in a school-based multi-centre study: The Pathways study. Stat Med 20 305 316

19. TorgersonDJ

TorgersonCJ

2008 Designing randomised trials in health, education and the social sciences. An introduction New York Palgrave Macmillan 256

20. HahnS

PufferS

TorgersonDJ

WatsonJ

2005 Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 5 10

21. JordhoyMS

FayersPM

Ahlner-ElmqvistM

KaasaS

2002 Lack of concealment may lead to selection bias in cluster randomized trials of palliative care. Palliat Med 16 43 49

22. GrovesRM

DillmanDA

EltingeJL

LittleRJA

2002 Survey nonresponse New York John Wiley & Sons 520

23. KesslerRC

LittleRJ

GrovesRM

1995 Advances in strategies for minimizing and adjusting for survey nonresponse. Epidemiol Rev 17 192 204

24. RosenbaumP

RubinD

1983 The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 41 55

25. RosenbaumPR

RubinDB

1984 Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc 79 516 524

26. RavaudP

FlipoRM

BoutronI

RoyC

GiraudeauB

2009 ARTIST (osteoarthritis intervention standardized) study of standardised consultation versus usual care for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee in primary care in France: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ 338 b421 doi:10.1136/bmj.b421

27. van MarwijkHW

AderH

de HaanM

BeekmanA

2008 Primary care management of major depression in patients aged > or  = 55 years: Outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Br J Gen Pract 58 680 686I–II; discussion 687

28. NicholasJ

GullifordMC

2008 Commentary. What is a propensity score? Br J Gen Pract 58 687

29. CampbellR

StarkeyF

HollidayJ

AudreyS

BloorM

2008 An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): A cluster randomised trial. Lancet 371 1595 1602

30. BellaryS

O'HareJP

RaymondNT

GumberA

MughalS

2008 Enhanced diabetes care to patients of south Asian ethnic origin (the United Kingdom Asian Diabetes Study): A cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 371 1769 1776