Ensuring Integrity in Comparative Effectiveness Research: Accentuate the Negative

1. MäusezahlD

ChristenA

Duran PachecoG

TellezFA

IriarteM

2009 Solar Drinking Water Disinfection (SODIS) to reduce childhood diarrhoea in rural Bolivia: A cluster-randomized, controlled trial. PLoS Med 6(8) e1000125 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000125

2. Park-WyllieLY

MamdaniMM

LiP

GillSS

LaupacisA

2009 Cholinesterase inhibitors and hospitalization for bradycardia: A population-based study. PLoS Med 6(9) e1000157 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000157

3. MenziesD

BenedettiA

PaydarA

RoyceS

PaiM

2009 Standardized Treatment of active tuberculosis in patients with previous treatment and/or with mono-resistance to isoniazid: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 6(9) e1000150 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000150

4. RossJS

MulveyGK

HinesEM

NissenSE

KrumholzHM

2009 Trial Publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A cross-sectional analysis. PLoS Med 6(9) e1000144 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000144

5. [No authors listed] 2009 March Text of the Recovery Act Related to Comparative Effectiveness Funding. Excerpt from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5). Available: http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/recoveryacttext.html. Accessed 9 August 2009)

6. Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization, Institute of Medicine 2009 Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research Washington (D. C.) The National Academies Press Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12648.html. Accessed 9 August 2009

7. LaineC

HortonR

DeAngelisCD

DrazenJM

FrizelleFA

2007 Clinical trial registration: Looking back and moving ahead. Croat Med J 48 289 291

8. EQUATOR Network 2009 EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research) Network home page. Available: http://www.equator-network.org/. Accessed 12 August 2009