Anatomy of the Epidemiological Literature on the 2003 SARS Outbreaks in Hong Kong and Toronto: A Time-Stratified Review

English version České info

Background:
Outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases, especially those of a global nature, require rapid epidemiological analysis and information dissemination. The final products of those activities usually comprise internal memoranda and briefs within public health authorities and original research published in peer-reviewed journals. Using the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic as an example, we conducted a comprehensive time-stratified review of the published literature to describe the different types of epidemiological outputs.

Methods and Findings:
We identified and analyzed all published articles on the epidemiology of the SARS outbreak in Hong Kong or Toronto. The analysis was stratified by study design, research domain, data collection, and analytical technique. We compared the SARS-case and matched-control non-SARS articles published according to the timeline of submission, acceptance, and publication. The impact factors of the publishing journals were examined according to the time of publication of SARS articles, and the numbers of citations received by SARS-case and matched-control articles submitted during and after the epidemic were compared. Descriptive, analytical, theoretical, and experimental epidemiology concerned, respectively, 54%, 30%, 11%, and 6% of the studies. Only 22% of the studies were submitted, 8% accepted, and 7% published during the epidemic. The submission-to-acceptance and acceptance-to-publication intervals of the SARS articles submitted during the epidemic period were significantly shorter than the corresponding intervals of matched-control non-SARS articles published in the same journal issues (p<0.001 and p<0.01, respectively). The differences of median submission-to-acceptance intervals and median acceptance-to-publication intervals between SARS articles and their corresponding control articles were 106.5 d (95% confidence interval [CI] 55.0–140.1) and 63.5 d (95% CI 18.0–94.1), respectively. The median numbers of citations of the SARS articles submitted during the epidemic and over the 2 y thereafter were 17 (interquartile range [IQR] 8.0–52.0) and 8 (IQR 3.2–21.8), respectively, significantly higher than the median numbers of control article citations (15, IQR 8.5–16.5, p<0.05, and 7, IQR 3.0–12.0, p<0.01, respectively).

Conclusions:
A majority of the epidemiological articles on SARS were submitted after the epidemic had ended, although the corresponding studies had relevance to public health authorities during the epidemic. To minimize the lag between research and the exigency of public health practice in the future, researchers should consider adopting common, predefined protocols and ready-to-use instruments to improve timeliness, and thus, relevance, in addition to standardizing comparability across studies. To facilitate information dissemination, journal managers should reengineer their fast-track channels, which should be adapted to the purpose of an emerging outbreak, taking into account the requirement of high standards of quality for scientific journals and competition with other online resources.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary

Vyšlo v časopise: Anatomy of the Epidemiological Literature on the 2003 SARS Outbreaks in Hong Kong and Toronto: A Time-Stratified Review. PLoS Med 7(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000272
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000272

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. JonesKE

PatelNG

LevyMA

StoreygardA

BalkD

2008 Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451 990 993

2. MorensDM

FolkersGK

FauciAS

2004 The challenge of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Nature 430 242 249

3. ConnollyMA

2005 Communicable disease control in emergencies – a field manual. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available: http://www.who.int/infectious-disease-news/IDdocs/whocds200527/ISBN_9241546166.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2008

4. HeymannDL

RodierGR

2001 Hot spots in a wired world: WHO surveillance of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Lancet Infect Dis 1 345 353

5. MykhalovskiyE

WeirL

2006 The Global Public Health Intelligence Network and early warning outbreak detection: a Canadian contribution to global public health. Can J Public Health 97 42 44

6. GoodmanRA

BuehlerJW

KoplanJP

1990 The epidemiologic field investigation: science and judgment in public health practice. Am J Epidemiol 132 9 16

7. ReingoldAL

1998 Outbreak investigations–a perspective. Emerg Infect Dis 4 21 27

8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2006 Investigating an outbreak. Principles of epidemiology in public health practice. 3rd edition Atlanta Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Available: http://www.ihs.gov/medicalprograms/portlandinjury/pdfs/principlesofepidemiologyinpublichealthpractice.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2007

9. World Health Organization 2003 Consensus document on the epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) Geneva Department of Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response, World Health Organization Available: http://www.who.int/csr/sars/en/WHOconsensus.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2007

10. AndersonRM

FraserC

GhaniAC

DonnellyCA

RileyS

2004 Epidemiology, transmission dynamics and control of SARS: the 2002–2003 epidemic. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359 1091 1105

11. LastJM

2001 A dictionary of epidemiology. 4th edition New York Oxford University Press

12. DonnellyCA

GhaniAC

LeungGM

HedleyAJ

FraserC

2003 Epidemiological determinants of spread of causal agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. Lancet 361 1761 1766

13. PoutanenSM

LowDE

HenryB

FinkelsteinS

RoseD

2003 Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N Engl J Med 348 1995 2005

14. NaylorCD

ChantlerC

GriffithsS

2004 Learning from SARS in Hong Kong and Toronto. JAMA 291 2483 2487

15. World Health Organization. SARS outbreak contained worldwide. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2003/pr56/en/. Accessed 4 February 2007

16. National CASP Collaboration for Qualitative Methodologies 2006 Critical Appraisal Skills Programme: 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research Oxford Public Health Resource Unit Available: http://www.phru.nhs.uk/Doc_Links/Qualitative%20Appraisal%20Tool.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2007

17. CohenJ

1960 A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20 37 46

18. R Development Core Team 2007 R: A language and environment for statistical computing Vienna R Foundation for Statistical Computing Available: http://www.R-project.org

19. JonckheereAR

1954 A distribution-free κ-sample test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika 41 133 145

20. GumelAB

RuanS

DayT

WatmoughJ

BrauerF

2004 Modelling strategies for controlling SARS outbreaks. Proc Biol Sci 271 2223 2232

21. LeungDT

van MarenWW

ChanFK

ChanWS

LoAW

2006 Extremely low exposure of a community to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus: false seropositivity due to use of bacterially derived antigens. J Virol 80 8920 8928

22. LauJT

LeungPC

WongEL

FongC

ChengKF

2005 The use of an herbal formula by hospital care workers during the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic in Hong Kong to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome transmission, relieve influenza-related symptoms, and improve quality of life: a prospective cohort study. J Altern Complement Med 11 49 55

23. MullerMP

TomlinsonG

MarrieTJ

TangP

McGeerA

2005 Can routine laboratory tests discriminate between severe acute respiratory syndrome and other causes of community-acquired pneumonia? Clin Infect Dis 40 1079 1086

24. TsangKW

HoPL

OoiGC

YeeWK

WangT

2003 A cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med 348 1977 1985

25. World Health Organization 2003 Acute respiratory syndrome. China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, and Viet Nam. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 78 73 74

26. Nature Publishing Group. Nature Precedings. Available: http://precedings.nature.com/. Accessed 16 January 2010

27. British Medical Journal (BMJ) Group. Pandemic flu. Available: http://pandemicflu.bmj.com/. Accessed 16 January 2010

28. Public Library of Science (PLoS). PLoS Currents: Influenza. Available: http://knol.google.com/k/plos/plos-currents-influenza/28qm4w0q65e4w/1%23#. Accessed 28 September 2009

29. CauchemezS

BoellePY

DonnellyCA

FergusonNM

ThomasG

2006 Real-time estimates in early detection of SARS. Emerg Infect Dis 12 110 113

30. TranTH

Ruiz-PalaciosGM

HaydenFG

FarrarJ

2009 Patient-oriented pandemic influenza research. Lancet 373 2085 2086

31. von ElmE

AltmanDG

EggerM

PocockSJ

GotzschePC

2007 The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 4 e296 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296

32. CampbellMK

ElbourneDR

AltmanDG

2004 CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 328 702 708

33. LeungGM

HedleyAJ

HoLM

ChauP

WongIO

2004 The epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome in the 2003 Hong Kong epidemic: an analysis of all 1755 patients. Ann Intern Med 141 662 673

34. Public Health Agency of Canada 2003 Epidemic curve of a SARS outbreak in Canada, February 23 to 2 July, 2003. Available: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/sars-sras/pdf-ec/ec_20030808.pdf. Accessed 2 March 2008