#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Evidence-Based Priority Setting for Health Care and Research: Tools to Support Policy in Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health in Africa


article has not abstract


Vyšlo v časopise: Evidence-Based Priority Setting for Health Care and Research: Tools to Support Policy in Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health in Africa. PLoS Med 7(7): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000308
Kategorie: Essay
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000308

Souhrn

article has not abstract


Zdroje

1. World Health Organization 2010 Report of the World Health Organization Expert Working Group on Research and Development Financing 2010. Available: http://www.who.int/phi/documents/RDFinancingwithISBN.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2010

2. KapiririL

NorheimOF

MartinDK

2009 Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making? Soc Sci Med 68 766 773

3. KleinR

1998 Puzzling out priorities. Why we must acknowledge that rationing is a political process. Br Med J 317 959 960

4. RudanI

GibsonJ

KapiririL

LansangMA

HyderAA

2007 Setting priorities in global child health research investments: Assessment of principles and practice. Croat Med J 48 595 604

5. MoranM

GuzmanJ

RoparsA-L

McDonaldA

JamesonN

OmuneB

RyanS

WuL

2009 Neglected disease research and development: how much are we really spending? PLoS Med 6 e30 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000030

6. EnserinkM

2009 Some neglected diseases are more neglected than others. Science 323 700

7. YoungkongS

KapiririL

BaltussenR

2009 Setting priorities for health interventions in developing countries: a review of empirical studies. Trop Med Int Health 14 930 939

8. KapiririL

ArnesenT

NorheimOF

2004 Is cost-effectiveness analysis preferred to severity of disease as the main guiding principle in priority setting in resource poor settings? The case of Uganda. Cost Effect Resource Allocat 2 1 11

9. AllenL

2010 The art of evaluating the impact of medical science. Bull WHO 88 4

10. RudanI

ChanKY

ZhangJSF

TheodoratouE

FengXL

SalomonJ

LawnJE

CousensS

BlackRE

GuoY

CampbellH

2010 Causes of deaths in children younger than 5 years in China in 2008. Lancet 375 1083 1089

11. KapiririL

MartinDK

2006 Priority setting in developing countries health care institutions: the case of a Ugandan hospital. BMC Health Serv Res 6 127

12. MshanaS

ShemiluH

NdawiB

2007 What do district health planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using ‘Accountability for Reasonableness’? BMC Health Serv Res 7 180

13. LaxminarayanR

MillsAJ

BremanJG

MeashamAR

AlleyneG

2006 Advancement of global health: key messages from the Disease Control Priorities Project. Lancet 367 1193

14. UNICEF/The World Bank 2010 Marginal Budgeting for Bottlenecks. Available: http://www.who.int/pmnch/topics/economics/costingtools_resources/en/index.html. Accessed: 10 March 2010

15. AdamT

LimSS

MehtaS

BhuttaZA

FogstadH

2005 Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries. BMJ 331 1107

16. VictoraCG

2010 LiST: using epidemiology to guide child survival policymaking and programming. Int J Epidemiol 39 (Suppl 1) i1 2

17. BobadillaJL

CowleyP

MusgroveP

SaxenianH

1992 Design, content and financing of an essential national package of health services. Bull World Health Organ 72 653 662

18. RudanI

ChopraM

KapiririL

GibsonJ

LansangMA

2008 Setting priorities in global child health research investments: universal challenges and conceptual framework. Croat Med J 49 307 317

19. KapiririL

TomlinsonM

GibsonJ

ChopraM

El ArifeenS

2007 Setting priorities in global child health research investments: Addressing the values of the stakeholders. Croat Med J 48 618 627

20. RudanI

GibsonJL

AmeratungaS

El ArifeenS

BhuttaZA

2008 Setting priorities in global child health research investments: Guidelines for implementation of the CHNRI method. Croat Med J 49 720 733

21. WalleyJ

LawnJE

TinkerA

De FranciscoA

ChopraM

2008 Primary Health Care: making Alma Ata a reality. Lancet 372 1001 1007

22. PattinsonR

LawnJE

DarmstadtG

RubensC

FlenadyV

2010 Priority interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths. Lancet In press

23. TomlinsonM

RudanI

SaxenaS

SwartzL

TsaiAC

PatelV

2009 Setting investment priorities for research in global mental health. Bull World Health Organ 87 438 446

24. CostelloA

FilippiV

KubbaT

HortonR

2007 Research challenges to improve maternal and child survival. Lancet 369 1240 1243

25. BahlR

MartinesJ

AliN

BhanMK

CarloW

2009 Research priorities to reduce global mortality from newborn infections by 2015. Pediatr Inf Dis J 28 (Suppl 1) S43 S48

26. FontaineO

KosekM

BhatnagarS

Boschi-PintoC

ChanKY

2009 Setting research priorities to reduce global mortality from childhood diarrhoea by 2015. PLoS Med 6 e41 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000041

27. RudanI

El ArifeenS

BlackRE

CampbellH

2007 Childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea: Setting our priorities right. Lancet Inf Dis 7 56 61

28. BrownKH

HessSY

BoyE

GibsonRS

HortonS

2009 Setting priorities for zinc-related health research to reduce children's disease burden worldwide: An application of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative's research priority-setting method. Public Health Nutr 12 389 396

29. TomlinsonM

SwartzL

OfficerA

ChanKY

RudanI

SaxenaS

2009 Research priorities for health of people with disabilities: an expert opinion exercise. Lancet 374 1857 1862

30. TomlinsonM

ChopraM

HooseinN

RudanI

2010 Research priority setting processes at national level: Good practices for health research. Health Syst Res Policy In press

31. TomlinsonM

ChopraM

SandersD

BradshawD

HendricksM

2007 Setting priorities in child health research investments for South Africa. PLoS Med 4 e259 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040259

32. RudanI

2009 The complex challenge of setting priorities in health research investments. Indian J Med Res 129 351 353

33. WalkerN

Fischer-WalkerC

BryceJ

BahlR

CousensS

CHERG Review Groups on Intervention Effects 2010 Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival. Int J Epidemiol 39 (Suppl 1) i21 31

34. FribergIK

BhuttaZA

DarmstadtGL

BangA

CousensS

2010 Comparing modelled predictions of neonatal mortality impacts using LiST with observed results of community-based intervention trials in South Asia. Int J Epidemiol 39 (Suppl 1) i11 20

35. HazelE

GilroyK

FribergI

BlackRE

BryceJ

2010 Comparing modelled to measured mortality reductions: applying the Lives Saved Tool to evaluation data from the Accelerated Child Survival Programme in West Africa. Int J Epidemiol 39 (Suppl 1) i32 9

36. AmouzouA

RichardSA

FribergIK

BryceJ

BaquiAH

2010 How well does LiST capture mortality by wealth quintile? A comparison of measured versus modelled mortality rates among children under-five in Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol 39 (Suppl 1) i186 92

37. BryceJ

FribergIK

KraushaarD

NsonaH

AfenyaduGY

2010 LiST as a catalyst in program planning: experiences from Burkina Faso, Ghana and Malawi. Int J Epidemiol 39 (Suppl 1) i40 7

Štítky
Interné lekárstvo

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2010 Číslo 7
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#