Challenges in Developing Evidence-Based Recommendations Using the GRADE Approach: The Case of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders

1. McCarthyM

2005 Critics slam draft WHO report on homoeopathy. Lancet 366 705 706

2. HortonR

2002 WHO: the casualties and compromises of renewal. Lancet 359 1605 1611

3. OxmanAD

LavisJN

FretheimA

2007 Use of evidence in WHO recommendations. Lancet 369 1883 1889

4. HillS

PangT

2007 Leading by example: a culture change at WHO. Lancet 369 1842 1844

5. World Health Organization 2008 WHO Handbook for guideline development. Available: http://www.searo.who.int/LinkFiles/RPC_Handbook_Guideline_Development.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2010

6. SchunemannHJ

HillSR

KakadM

VistGE

BellamyR

2007 Transparent development of the WHO rapid advice guidelines. PLoS Med 4 e119 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040119

7. SchunemannHJ

HillSR

KakadM

BellamyR

UyekiTM

2007 WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines for pharmacological management of sporadic human infection with avian influenza A (H5N1) virus. Lancet Infect Dis 7 21 31

8. World Health Organization 2009 Guidelines for the psychosocially assisted pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence Geneva WHO

9. World Health Organization. Scaling up care for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders. Available: http://www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap_final_english.pdf. Accessed Accessed 29 July 2010

10. PatelV

ThornicroftG

2009 Packages of care for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries: PLoS Medicine Series. PLoS Med 6 e1000160 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000160

11. HaynesR

2006 Forming research questions.

HaynesR

SacketD

GuyattG

TugwellP

Clinical epidemiology: how to do clinical practice research. Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 3 14

12. KavanaghBP

2009 The GRADE system for rating clinical guidelines. PLoS Med 6 e1000094 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000094

13. IoannidisJP

TrikalinosTA

2007 The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. CMAJ 176 1091 1096

14. MorenoSG

SuttonAJ

TurnerEH

AbramsKR

CooperNJ

2009 Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications. BMJ 339 b2981

15. SackettDL

WennbergJE

1997 Choosing the best research design for each question. BMJ 315 1636

16. GuyattGH

OxmanAD

KunzR

JaeschkeR

HelfandM

2008 Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ 336 1170 1173

17. GuyattGH

OxmanAD

KunzR

Falck-YtterY

VistGE

2008 Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 336 1049 1051

18. GuyattGH

OxmanAD

KunzR

VistGE

Falck-YtterY

2008 What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 336 995 998

19. GuyattGH

OxmanAD

VistGE

KunzR

Falck-YtterY

2008 GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336 924 926

20. BoltonP

BassJ

NeugebauerR

VerdeliH

CloughertyKF

2003 Group interpersonal psychotherapy for depression in rural Uganda: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 289 3117 3124

21. RahmanA

2007 Challenges and opportunities in developing a psychological intervention for perinatal depression in rural Pakistan–a multi-method study. Arch Womens Ment Health 10 211 219

22. RahmanA

MalikA

SikanderS

RobertsC

CreedF

2008 Cognitive behaviour therapy-based intervention by community health workers for mothers with depression and their infants in rural Pakistan: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 372 902 909

23. AnsariMT

TsertsvadzeA

MoherD

2009 Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: a perspective. PLoS Med 6 e1000151 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000151

24. DesjarlaisR

EisenbergL

GoodB

1995 World mental health: problems and priorities in low-income countries New York Oxford University Press

25. Institute of Medicine 2001 Neurological, psychiatric, and developmental disorders: meeting the challenge in the developing world Washington (D.C.) National Academy Press

26. WHO 2001 The world health report 2001. Mental health: new understanding, new hope Geneva World Health Organization Available: http://www.who.int/whr/2001/main/en/. Accessed 29 July 2010