#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Health Behaviours, Socioeconomic Status, and Mortality: Further Analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL Prospective Cohorts


Background:
Differences in morbidity and mortality between socioeconomic groups constitute one of the most consistent findings of epidemiologic research. However, research on social inequalities in health has yet to provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying this association. In recent analysis, we showed health behaviours, assessed longitudinally over the follow-up, to explain a major proportion of the association of socioeconomic status (SES) with mortality in the British Whitehall II study. However, whether health behaviours are equally important mediators of the SES-mortality association in different cultural settings remains unknown. In the present paper, we examine this issue in Whitehall II and another prospective European cohort, the French GAZEL study.

Methods and Findings:
We included 9,771 participants from the Whitehall II study and 17,760 from the GAZEL study. Over the follow-up (mean 19.5 y in Whitehall II and 16.5 y in GAZEL), health behaviours (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity), were assessed longitudinally. Occupation (in the main analysis), education, and income (supplementary analysis) were the markers of SES. The socioeconomic gradient in smoking was greater (p<0.001) in Whitehall II (odds ratio [OR]  = 3.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.11–4.36) than in GAZEL (OR  = 1.33, 95% CI 1.18–1.49); this was also true for unhealthy diet (OR  = 7.42, 95% CI 5.19–10.60 in Whitehall II and OR  = 1.31, 95% CI 1.15–1.49 in GAZEL, p<0.001). Socioeconomic differences in mortality were similar in the two cohorts, a hazard ratio of 1.62 (95% CI 1.28–2.05) in Whitehall II and 1.94 in GAZEL (95% CI 1.58–2.39) for lowest versus highest occupational position. Health behaviours attenuated the association of SES with mortality by 75% (95% CI 44%–149%) in Whitehall II but only by 19% (95% CI 13%–29%) in GAZEL. Analysis using education and income yielded similar results.

Conclusions:
Health behaviours were strong predictors of mortality in both cohorts but their association with SES was remarkably different. Thus, health behaviours are likely to be major contributors of socioeconomic differences in health only in contexts with a marked social characterisation of health behaviours.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Vyšlo v časopise: Health Behaviours, Socioeconomic Status, and Mortality: Further Analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL Prospective Cohorts. PLoS Med 8(2): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000419
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000419

Souhrn

Background:
Differences in morbidity and mortality between socioeconomic groups constitute one of the most consistent findings of epidemiologic research. However, research on social inequalities in health has yet to provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying this association. In recent analysis, we showed health behaviours, assessed longitudinally over the follow-up, to explain a major proportion of the association of socioeconomic status (SES) with mortality in the British Whitehall II study. However, whether health behaviours are equally important mediators of the SES-mortality association in different cultural settings remains unknown. In the present paper, we examine this issue in Whitehall II and another prospective European cohort, the French GAZEL study.

Methods and Findings:
We included 9,771 participants from the Whitehall II study and 17,760 from the GAZEL study. Over the follow-up (mean 19.5 y in Whitehall II and 16.5 y in GAZEL), health behaviours (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity), were assessed longitudinally. Occupation (in the main analysis), education, and income (supplementary analysis) were the markers of SES. The socioeconomic gradient in smoking was greater (p<0.001) in Whitehall II (odds ratio [OR]  = 3.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.11–4.36) than in GAZEL (OR  = 1.33, 95% CI 1.18–1.49); this was also true for unhealthy diet (OR  = 7.42, 95% CI 5.19–10.60 in Whitehall II and OR  = 1.31, 95% CI 1.15–1.49 in GAZEL, p<0.001). Socioeconomic differences in mortality were similar in the two cohorts, a hazard ratio of 1.62 (95% CI 1.28–2.05) in Whitehall II and 1.94 in GAZEL (95% CI 1.58–2.39) for lowest versus highest occupational position. Health behaviours attenuated the association of SES with mortality by 75% (95% CI 44%–149%) in Whitehall II but only by 19% (95% CI 13%–29%) in GAZEL. Analysis using education and income yielded similar results.

Conclusions:
Health behaviours were strong predictors of mortality in both cohorts but their association with SES was remarkably different. Thus, health behaviours are likely to be major contributors of socioeconomic differences in health only in contexts with a marked social characterisation of health behaviours.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Zdroje

1. KriegerN

WilliamsDR

MossNE

1997 Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 18 341 378

2. TownsendP

DavidsonN

1982 Inequalities in health: The Black report. Harmondsworth Penguin Books

3. KawachiI

SubramanianSV

Almeida-FilhoN

2002 A glossary for health inequalities. J Epidemiol Community Health 56 647 652

4. AdlerNE

OstroveJM

1999 Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don't. Ann N Y Acad Sci 896 3 15

5. BybergL

MelhusH

GedeborgR

SundstromJ

AhlbomA

2009 Total mortality after changes in leisure time physical activity in 50 year old men: 35 year follow-up of population based cohort. BMJ 338 b688

6. ChiuveSE

McCulloughML

SacksFM

RimmEB

2006 Healthy lifestyle factors in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease among men: benefits among users and nonusers of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medications. Circulation 114 160 167

7. KnoopsKT

de GrootLC

KromhoutD

PerrinAE

Moreiras-VarelaO

2004 Mediterranean diet, lifestyle factors, and 10-year mortality in elderly European men and women: the HALE project. JAMA 292 1433 1439

8. SabiaS

NabiH

KivimakiM

ShipleyMJ

MarmotMG

Singh-ManouxA

2009 Health behaviors from early to late midlife as predictors of cognitive function: The Whitehall II study. Am J Epidemiol 170 428 437

9. StampferMJ

HuFB

MansonJE

RimmEB

WillettWC

2000 Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. N Engl J Med 343 16 22

10. MokdadAH

MarksJS

StroupDF

GerberdingJL

2004 Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA 291 1238 1245

11. WHO 2004 Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Geneva WHO

12. WHO 2008 2008-2013 Action plan for the global strategy for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Geneva WHO

13. KhawKT

WarehamN

BinghamS

WelchA

LubenR

DayN

2008 Combined impact of health behaviours and mortality in men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. PLoS Med 5 e12 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050012

14. MacintyreS

2000 The social patterning of exercise behaviours: the role of personal and local resources. Br J Sports Med 34 6

15. WardleJ

SteptoeA

2003 Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles. J Epidemiol Community Health 57 440 443

16. LaaksonenM

PrattalaR

HelasojaV

UutelaA

LahelmaE

2003 Income and health behaviours. Evidence from monitoring surveys among Finnish adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 57 711 717

17. ChinnDJ

WhiteM

HarlandJ

DrinkwaterC

RaybouldS

1999 Barriers to physical activity and socioeconomic position: implications for health promotion. J Epidemiol Community Health 53 191 192

18. LynchJ

DaveySG

HarperS

BainbridgeK

2006 Explaining the social gradient in coronary heart disease: comparing relative and absolute risk approaches. J Epidemiol Community Health 60 436 441

19. AdlerNE

BoyceWT

ChesneyMA

FolkmanS

SymeSL

1993 Socioeconomic inequalities in health. No easy solution. JAMA 269 3140 3145

20. MacintyreS

1997 The Black Report and beyond: what are the issues? Soc Sci Med 44 723 745

21. MarmotMG

ShipleyMJ

RoseG

1984 Inequalities in death–specific explanations of a general pattern? Lancet 1 1003 1006

22. RoseG

MarmotMG

1981 Social class and coronary heart disease. Br Heart J 45 13 19

23. KaplanGA

KeilJE

1993 Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation 88 1973 1998

24. LaaksonenM

TalalaK

MartelinT

RahkonenO

RoosE

2008 Health behaviours as explanations for educational level differences in cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a follow-up of 60 000 men and women over 23 years. Eur J Public Health 18 38 43

25. LantzPM

HouseJS

LepkowskiJM

WilliamsDR

MeroRP

ChenJ

1998 Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. JAMA 279 1703 1708

26. SchrijversCT

StronksK

van de MheenHD

MackenbachJP

1999 Explaining educational differences in mortality: the role of behavioral and material factors. Am J Public Health 89 535 540

27. SkalickaV

vanLF

BambraC

KrokstadS

MackenbachJ

2009 Material, psychosocial, behavioural and biomedical factors in the explanation of relative socio-economic inequalities in mortality: evidence from the HUNT study. Int J Epidemiol 38 1272 1284

28. van OortFV

van LentheFJ

MackenbachJP

2005 Material, psychosocial, and behavioural factors in the explanation of educational inequalities in mortality in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 59 214 220

29. StringhiniS

SabiaS

ShipleyM

BrunnerE

NabiH

2010 Association of socioeconomic position with health behaviors and mortality. JAMA 303 1159 1166

30. MarmotM

BrunnerE

2005 Cohort Profile: the Whitehall II study. Int J Epidemiol 34 251 256

31. GoldbergM

LeclercA

BonenfantS

ChastangJF

SchmausA

2007 Cohort profile: the GAZEL Cohort Study. Int J Epidemiol 36 32 39

32. BrittonA

Singh-ManouxA

MarmotM

2004 Alcohol consumption and cognitive function in the Whitehall II Study. Am J Epidemiol 160 240 247

33. British Medical Association 1995 Alcohol: Guidelines on sensible drinking. London British Medical Association

34. SAS Institute Inc. 2000 SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8. Cary (North Carolina) SAS Institute Inc

35. ColeSR

HernanMA

2008 Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. Am J Epidemiol 168 656 664

36. CapewellS

GrahamH

2010 Will cardiovascular disease prevention widen health inequalities? PLoS Med 7 e1000320 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000320

37. WinklebyMA

FortmannSP

BarrettDC

1990 Social class disparities in risk factors for disease: eight-year prevalence patterns by level of education. Prev Med 19 1 12

38. OslerM

1993 Social class and health behaviour in Danish adults: a longitudinal study. Public Health 107 251 260

39. WagenknechtLE

PerkinsLL

CutterGR

SidneyS

BurkeGL

1990 Cigarette smoking behavior is strongly related to educational status: the CARDIA study. Prev Med 19 158 169

40. TrichopoulouA

LagiouP

1997 Healthy traditional Mediterranean diet: an expression of culture, history, and lifestyle. Nutr Rev 55 383 389

41. LopezAD

CollishawNE

PihaT

1994 A descriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries. Tob Control 3 242 247

42. TrichopoulouA

NaskaA

CostacouT

2002 Disparities in food habits across Europe. Proc Nutr Soc 61 553 558

43. CavelaarsAEJM

KunstAE

MackenbachJP

1997 Socio-economic differences in risk factors for morbidity and mortality in the european community: an international comparison. J Health Psychol 2 353 372

44. RoosG

JohanssonL

KasmelA

KlumbieneJ

PrattalaR

2001 Disparities in vegetable and fruit consumption: European cases from the north to the south. Public Health Nutr 4 35 43

45. WagnerA

SimonC

EvansA

DucimetiereP

BongardV

2003 Physical activity patterns in 50-59 year men in France and Northern Ireland. Associations with socio-economic status and health behaviour. Eur J Epidemiol 18 321 329

46. deVR

GnesottoR

GoldsteinM

AndersenR

CorniaGA

2005 The lack of social gradient of health behaviors and psychosocial factors in Northern Italy. Soz Praventivmed 50 197 205

47. GrahamH

1996 Smoking prevalence among women in the European community 1950-1990. Soc Sci Med 43 243 254

48. MackenbachJP

StirbuI

RoskamAJ

SchaapMM

MenvielleG

2008 Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med 358 2468 2481

49. TranPD

LeclercA

ChastangJF

GoldbergM

1998 Regional disparities in cardiovascular risk factors in France: a five-year analysis of the GAZEL cohort. Eur J Epidemiol 14 535 543

50. WilkinsonRG

1994 The epidemiological transition: from material scarcity to social disadvantage? Daedalus 123 61 77

51. ReddyKS

YusufS

1998 Emerging epidemic of cardiovascular disease in developing countries. Circulation 97 596 601

52. YusufS

ReddyS

OunpuuS

AnandS

2001 Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation 104 2746 2753

53. ReddyKS

KatanMB

2004 Diet, nutrition and the prevention of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Public Health Nutrition 7 167 186

54. CavelaarsAE

KunstAE

GeurtsJJ

CrialesiR

GrotvedtL

2000 Educational differences in smoking: international comparison. BMJ 320 1102 1107

55. HuismanM

KunstAE

MackenbachJP

2005 Educational inequalities in smoking among men and women aged 16 years and older in 11 European countries. Tob Control 14 106 113

56. BorrellC

Dominguez-BerjonF

PasarinMI

FerrandoJ

RohlfsI

NebotM

2000 Social inequalities in health related behaviours in Barcelona. J Epidemiol Community Health 54 24 30

57. FerrieJE

ShipleyMJ

StansfeldSA

SmithGD

MarmotM

2003 Future uncertainty and socioeconomic inequalities in health: the Whitehall II study. Soc Sci Med 57 637 646

58. LynchJW

SmithGD

KaplanGA

HouseJS

2000 Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions. BMJ 320 1200 1204

59. MarmotMG

BosmaH

HemingwayH

BrunnerE

StansfeldS

1997 Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence. Lancet 350 235 239

60. NiedhammerI

ChastangJF

DavidS

KelleherC

2008 The contribution of occupational factors to social inequalities in health: findings from the national French SUMER survey. Soc Sci Med 67 1870 1881

61. AldabeB

AndersonR

Lyly-YrjanainenM

Parent-ThirionA

VermeylenG

2010 Contribution of material, occupational, and psychosocial factors in the explanation of social inequalities in health in 28 countries in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health. In press

62. HemstromO

2005 Health inequalities by wage income in Sweden: the role of work environment. Soc Sci Med 61 637 647

63. RahkonenO

LaaksonenM

MartikainenP

RoosE

LahelmaE

2006 Job control, job demands, or social class? The impact of working conditions on the relation between social class and health. J Epidemiol Community Health 60 50 54

64. CloughertyJE

SouzaK

CullenMR

2010 Work and its role in shaping the social gradient in health. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1186 102 124

65. BorrellC

MuntanerC

BenachJ

ArtazcozL

2004 Social class and self-reported health status among men and women: what is the role of work organisation, household material standards and household labour? Soc Sci Med 58 1869 1887

66. BambraC

GibsonM

SowdenAJ

WrightK

WhiteheadM

PetticrewM

2009 Working for health? Evidence from systematic reviews on the effects on health and health inequalities of organisational changes to the psychosocial work environment. Prev Med 48 454 461

67. MelchiorM

KriegerN

KawachiI

BerkmanLF

NiedhammerI

GoldbergM

2005 Work factors and occupational class disparities in sickness absence: findings from the GAZEL cohort study. Am J Public Health 95 1206 1212

68. LynchJW

KaplanGA

ShemaSJ

1997 Cumulative impact of sustained economic hardship on physical, cognitive, psychological, and social functioning. N Engl J Med 337 1889 1895

69. MatthewsKA

GalloLC

TaylorSE

2010 Are psychosocial factors mediators of socioeconomic status and health connections? A progress report and blueprint for the future. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1186 146 173

70. KaikkonenR

RahkonenO

LallukkaT

LahelmaE

2009 Physical and psychosocial working conditions as explanations for occupational class inequalities in self-rated health. Eur J Public Health 19 458 463

71. SchrijversCT

van de MheenHD

StronksK

MackenbachJP

1998 Socioeconomic inequalities in health in the working population: the contribution of working conditions. Int J Epidemiol 27 1011 1018

72. KivimakiM

ShipleyMJ

FerrieJE

Singh-ManouxA

BattyGD

2008 Best-practice interventions to reduce socioeconomic inequalities of coronary heart disease mortality in UK: a prospective occupational cohort study. Lancet 372 1648 1654

73. BlakelyT

2002 Commentary: estimating direct and indirect effects-fallible in theory, but in the real world? Int J Epidemiol 31 166 167

74. OECD 2009 Education at a glance 2009. Paris OECD

75. INSEE 2010 Revenu disponible par ménage 1970–2008. Paris INSEE

76. MartikainenP

ValkonenT

1999 Bias related to the exclusion of the economically inactive in studies on social class differences in mortality. Int J Epidemiol 28 899 904

77. Office for National Statistics 2005 Smoking-related behaviour and attitudes, 2005. London Office for National Statistics

78. Policy Research Programme, Department of Health 2007 The changing social patterning of obesity: an analysis to inform practice and policy development. Final report to the Policy Research Programme, Department of Health. London Department of Health

79. Office for National Statistics 2008 General household survey 2008. London Office for National Statistics

80. MenvielleG

StirbuI

RoskamAJ

SchaapMM

LeinsaluM

2009 [Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in Europe]. Med Sci (Paris) 25 192 196

81. LeclercA

NiedhammerI

2004 Les inégalités sociales de santé en France. Santé, Societé et Solidarité 2 29 35

Štítky
Interné lekárstvo

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2011 Číslo 2
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#