Comparative Performance of Private and Public Healthcare Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

English version České info

Introduction:
Private sector healthcare delivery in low- and middle-income countries is sometimes argued to be more efficient, accountable, and sustainable than public sector delivery. Conversely, the public sector is often regarded as providing more equitable and evidence-based care. We performed a systematic review of research studies investigating the performance of private and public sector delivery in low- and middle-income countries.

Methods and Findings:
Peer-reviewed studies including case studies, meta-analyses, reviews, and case-control analyses, as well as reports published by non-governmental organizations and international agencies, were systematically collected through large database searches, filtered through methodological inclusion criteria, and organized into six World Health Organization health system themes: accessibility and responsiveness; quality; outcomes; accountability, transparency, and regulation; fairness and equity; and efficiency. Of 1,178 potentially relevant unique citations, data were obtained from 102 articles describing studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Comparative cohort and cross-sectional studies suggested that providers in the private sector more frequently violated medical standards of practice and had poorer patient outcomes, but had greater reported timeliness and hospitality to patients. Reported efficiency tended to be lower in the private than in the public sector, resulting in part from perverse incentives for unnecessary testing and treatment. Public sector services experienced more limited availability of equipment, medications, and trained healthcare workers. When the definition of “private sector” included unlicensed and uncertified providers such as drug shop owners, most patients appeared to access care in the private sector; however, when unlicensed healthcare providers were excluded from the analysis, the majority of people accessed public sector care. “Competitive dynamics” for funding appeared between the two sectors, such that public funds and personnel were redirected to private sector development, followed by reductions in public sector service budgets and staff.

Conclusions:
Studies evaluated in this systematic review do not support the claim that the private sector is usually more efficient, accountable, or medically effective than the public sector; however, the public sector appears frequently to lack timeliness and hospitality towards patients.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary

Vyšlo v časopise: Comparative Performance of Private and Public Healthcare Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. PLoS Med 9(6): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001244
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001244

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. BerendesSHeywoodPOliverSGarnerP 2011 Quality of private and public ambulatory health care in low and middle income countries: systematic review of comparative studies. PLoS Med 8 e1000433 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000433

2. StucklerDBasuSWangSWMcKeeM 2011 Does recession reduce global health aid? evidence from 15 high-income countries, 1975–2007. Bull World Health Organ 89 252 257

3. StucklerDBasuS 2009 The International Monetary Fund's effects on global health: before and after the 2008 financial crisis. Int J Health Serv 39 771 781

4. ElliottL (2009 October 1) Cut NHS costs to pay off debt, IMF warns Britain. The Guardian

5. Oxfam 2009 Blind optimism: challenging the myths about private health care in poor countries. Oxford: Oxfam International

6. World Bank 2009 World Bank responds to new Oxfam health report. Washington (District of Columbia): World Bank

7. HardingA 2009 Oxfam—this is not how to help the poor. Washington (District of Columbia): Center for Global Development

8. RosenthalGNewbranderW 1996 Public policy and private sector provision of health services. Int J Health Plann Manage 11 203 216

9. MontagueDFeachemRFeachemNSKoehlmoosTPKinlawH 2009 Oxfam must shed its ideological bias to be taken seriously. BMJ 338 b1202

10. StockingB 2009 Critique of Oxfam paper inaccurate, unconstructive and ideologically biased. BMJ 338: b667 [response]. Available: http://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/02/critique-oxfam-paper-inaccurate-unconstructive-and-ideologically-biased. Accessed 22 May 2012.

11. SmithRFeachemRFeachemNSKoehlmoosTPKinlawH 2009 The fallacy of impartiality: competing interest bias in academic publications. J R Soc Med 102 44 45

12. World Health Organization 2011 Global health observatory. Geneva: World Health Organization

13. MurrayCFrenkJ 2000 World health report 2000: a step towards evidence-based health policy. Lancet 357 1698 1700

14. World Bank 2011 How we classify countries. Washington (District of Columbia): World Bank

15. GwatkinDRWagstaffAYazbeckAS 2005 Reaching the poor with health, nutrition, and population services: what works, what doesn't, and why. Washington (District of Columbia): World Bank

16. AgampodiSBAmarasingheDA 2007 Private sector contribution to childhood immunization: Sri Lankan experience. Indian J Med Sci 61 192 200

17. BustreoFHardingAAxelssonH 2003 Can developing countries achieve adequate improvements in child health outcomes without engaging the private sector? Bull World Health Organ 81 886 895

18. MbonyeAKHansenKSWamonoFMagnussenP 2009 Increasing access to prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV services through the private sector in Uganda. Sex Transm Infect 85 534 539

19. WangWSulzbachSDeS 2011 Utilization of HIV-related services from the private health sector: a multi-country analysis. Soc Sci Med 72 216 223

20. PrataNMontaguDJefferysE 2005 Private sector, human resources and health franchising in Africa. Bull World Health Organ 83 274 279

21. GwatkinDR 2000 Health inequalities and the health of the poor: what do we know? What can we do? Bull World Health Organ 78 3 18

22. World Bank 2011 Private health sector assessment in Ghana. Washington (District of Columbia): World Bank

23. BrughaRPritze-AliassimeS 2003 Promoting safe motherhood through the private sector in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 81 616 623

24. GilsonLAlilioMHeggenhougenK 1994 Community satisfaction with primary health care services: an evaluation undertaken in the Morogoro region of Tanzania. Soc Sci Med 39 767 780

25. LindelowMSerneelsP 2006 The performance of health workers in Ethiopia: results from qualitative research. Soc Sci Med 62 2225 2235

26. DeressaWAliAHailemariamD 2008 Malaria-related health-seeking behaviour and challenges for care providers in rural Ethiopia: implications for control. J Biosoc Sci 40 115 135

27. LewisMEskelandGTraa-ValerezoX 2004 Primary health care in practice: is it effective? Health Policy 70 303 325

28. HoaNBCobelensFGSyDNNhungNVBorgdorffMW 2011 Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis in the private sector, Vietnam. Emerg Infect Dis 17 562 564

29. TuranJMBulutANalbantHOrtayliNAkalinAA 2006 The quality of hospital-based antenatal care in Istanbul. Stud Fam Plann 37 49 60

30. LimMKYangHZhangTFengWZhouZ 2004 Public perceptions of private health care in socialist China. Health Aff (Millwood) 23 222 234

31. PongsupapYVan LerbergheW 2006 Choosing between public and private or between hospital and primary care: responsiveness, patient-centredness and prescribing patterns in outpatient consultations in Bangkok. Trop Med Int Health 11 81 89

32. SiddiqiSHamidSRafiqueGChaudhrySAAliN 2002 Prescription practices of public and private health care providers in Attock District of Pakistan. Int J Health Plann Manage 17 23 40

33. BhatiaJClelandJ 2004 Health care of female outpatients in south-central India: comparing public and private sector provision. Health Policy Plan 19 402 409

34. BrughaRZwiA 1998 Improving the quality of private sector delivery of public health services: challenges and strategies. Health Policy Plan 13 107 120

35. PaphassarangCPhilavongKBouphaBBlasE 2002 Equity, privatization and cost recovery in urban health care: the case of Lao PDR. Health Policy Plan 17 (Suppl) 72 84

36. World Bank 2005 Comparative advantages of public and private health care providers in Bangladesh. Dhaka: World Bank

37. AuerCLagahidJYTannerMWeissMG 2006 Diagnosis and management of tuberculosis by private practitioners in Manila, Philippines. Health Policy 77 172 181

38. DatoMIImazMS 2009 Tuberculosis control and the private sector in a low incidence setting in Argentina. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota) 11 370 382

39. GreavesFOuyangHPefoleMMacCarthySCashRA 2007 Compliance with DOTS diagnosis and treatment recommendations by private practitioners in Kerala, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 11 110 112

40. LambertMLDelgadoRMichauxGVolzAVan der StuyftP 2004 Tuberculosis control and the private health sector in Bolivia: a survey of pharmacies. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 8 1325 1329

41. NateropEWolffersI 1999 The role of the privatization process on tuberculosis control in HoChiMinh City Province, Vietnam. Soc Sci Med 48 1589 1598

42. UdwadiaZFPintoLMUplekarMW 2010 Tuberculosis management by private practitioners in Mumbai, India: has anything changed in two decades? PLoS ONE 5 e12023 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012023

43. VandanNAliMPrasadRKuroiwaC 2009 Assessment of doctors' knowledge regarding tuberculosis management in Lucknow, India: a public-private sector comparison. Public Health 123 484 489

44. MahendradhataYLambertMLBoelaertMVan der StuyftP 2007 Engaging the private sector for tuberculosis control: much advocacy on a meagre evidence base. Trop Med Int Health 12 315 316

45. Ogwal-OkengJWObuaCWaakoPAupontORoss-DegnanD 2004 A comparison of prescribing practices between public and private sector physicians in Uganda. East Afr Med J

46. UzochukwuBSChiegbokaLOEnwereuzoCNwosuUOkoraforD 2010 Examining appropriate diagnosis and treatment of malaria: availability and use of rapid diagnostic tests and artemisinin-based combination therapy in public and private health facilities in south east Nigeria. BMC Public Health 10 486

47. GbotoshoGOHappiCTGaniyuAOgundahunsiOASowunmiA 2009 Potential contribution of prescription practices to the emergence and spread of chloroquine resistance in south-west Nigeria: caution in the use of artemisinin combination therapy. Malar J 8 313

48. GuptaSGunterJTNovakRJRegensJL 2009 Patterns of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum malaria underscore importance of data collection from private health care facilities in India. Malar J 8 227

49. MuhuriPKAnkerMBryceJ 1996 Treatment patterns for childhood diarrhoea: evidence from demographic and health surveys. Bull World Health Organ 74 135 146

50. ArrietaA 2011 Health reform and cesarean sections in the private sector: the experience of Peru. Health Policy 99 124 130

51. BatemanC 2008 Private sector cannot be left to ‘own devices’. S Afr Med J 98 77 78

52. MakuchMYPettaCAOsisMJBahamondesL 2010 Low priority level for infertility services within the public health sector: a Brazilian case study. Hum Reprod 25 430 435

53. Justin-TemuMNondoRSWiedenmayerKRamaiyaKLTeuscherA 2009 Anti-diabetic drugs in the private and public sector in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. East Afr Med J 86 110 114

54. ConnollyAMWilkinsonDHarrisonALurieMKarimSS 1999 Inadequate treatment for sexually transmitted diseases in the South African private health sector. Int J STD AIDS 10 324 327

55. SchneiderHBlaauwDDartnallECoetzeeDJBallardRC 2001 STD care in the South African private health sector. S Afr Med J 91 151 156

56. BateRCoticelliPTrenRAttaranA 2008 Antimalarial drug quality in the most severely malarious parts of Africa—a six country study. PLoS ONE 3 e2132 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002132

57. SengaloundethSGreenMDFernandezFMManolinOPhommavongK 2009 A stratified random survey of the proportion of poor quality oral artesunate sold at medicine outlets in the Lao PDR—implications for therapeutic failure and drug resistance. Malar J 8 172

58. JacobsBWhitworthJKambuguFPoolR 2004 Sexually transmitted disease management in Uganda's private-for-profit formal and informal sector and compliance with treatment. Sex Transm Dis 31 650 654

59. SchneiderHPalmerN 2002 Getting to the truth? Researching user views of primary health care. Health Policy Plan 17 32 41

60. RussellS 2005 Treatment-seeking behaviour in urban Sri Lanka: trusting the state, trusting private providers. Soc Sci Med 61 1396 1407

61. ChengsornNBlossEAnekvorapongRAnuwatnonthakateAWattanaamornkiatW 2009 Tuberculosis services and treatment outcomes in private and public health care facilities in Thailand, 2004–2006. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 13 888 894

62. HongYPKimSJLeeEGLewWJBaiJY 1999 Treatment of bacillary pulmonary tuberculosis at the chest clinics in the private sector in Korea, 1993. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 3 695 702

63. AkhtarSRoziSWhiteFHasanR 2011 Cohort analysis of directly observed treatment outcomes for tuberculosis patients in urban Pakistan. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 15 90 96

64. BissonGPFrankIGrossRLo ReV3rdStromJB 2006 Out-of-pocket costs of HAART limit HIV treatment responses in Botswana's private sector. AIDS 20 1333 1336

65. HowardDHRoyK 2004 Private care and public health: do vaccination and prenatal care rates differ between users of private versus public sector care in India? Health Serv Res 39 2013 2026

66. SoeungSCGrundyJMornCSamnangC 2008 Evaluation of immunization knowledge, practices, and service-delivery in the private sector in Cambodia. J Health Popul Nutr 26 95 104

67. De GrooteTDe PaepePUngerJP 2005 Colombia: in vivo test of health sector privatization in the developing world. Int J Health Serv 35 125 141

68. GiffinK 1994 Women's health and the privatization of fertility control in Brazil. Soc Sci Med 39 355 360

69. FiedlerJL 1996 The privatization of health care in three Latin American social security systems. Health Policy Plan 11 406 417

70. MasjediMRFadaizadehLTaghizadeh AslR 2007 Notification of patients with tuberculosis detected in the private sector, Tehran, Iran. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 11 882 886

71. PetersDHMirchandaniGGHansenPM 2004 Strategies for engaging the private sector in sexual and reproductive health: how effective are they? Health Policy Plan 19 i5 i21

72. PatouillardEGoodmanCAHansonKGMillsAJ 2007 Can working with the private for-profit sector improve utilization of quality health services by the poor? A systematic review of the literature. Int J Equity Health 6 17

73. SinghAMavalankarDVBhatRDesaiAPatelSR 2009 Providing skilled birth attendants and emergency obstetric care to the poor through partnership with private sector obstetricians in Gujarat, India. Bull World Health Organ 87 960 964

74. KumaranayakeL 1997 The role of regulation: influencing private sector activity within health sector reform. J Int Dev 9 641 649

75. KumaranayakeLMujinjaPHongoroCMpembeniR 2000 How do countries regulate the health sector? Evidence from Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Health Policy Plan 15 357 367

76. HongoroCKumaranayakeL 2000 Do they work? Regulating for-profit providers in Zimbabwe. Health Policy Plan 15 368 377

77. WilkinsonDKarimSSLurieMHarrisonA 2001 Public-private health sector partnerships for STD control in South Africa—perspectives from the Hlabisa experience. S Afr Med J 91 517 520

78. World Bank 2011 Healthy partnerships: how governments can engage the private sector to improve health in Africa. Washington (District of Columbia): World Bank

79. BlumenthalDHsiaoW 2005 Privatization and its discontents—the evolving Chinese health care system. N Engl J Med 353 1165 1170

80. Van Den HeeverAM 1998 Private sector health reform in South Africa. Health Econ 7 281 289

81. SharmaSDayaratnaV 2005 Creating conditions for greater private sector participation in achieving contraceptive security. Health Policy 71 347 357

82. BensonJS 2001 The impact of privatization on access in Tanzania. Soc Sci Med 52 1903 1915

83. ScarpaciJL 1987 HMO promotion and the privatization of health care in Chile. J Health Polit Policy Law 12 551 567

84. WaitzkinHJasso-AguilarRIriartC 2007 Privatization of health services in less developed countries: an empirical response to the proposals of the World Bank and Wharton School. Int J Health Serv 37 205 227

85. LarsonCPSahaURIslamRRoyN 2006 Childhood diarrhoea management practices in Bangladesh: private sector dominance and continued inequities in care. Int J Epidemiol 35 1430 1439

86. YoongJBurgerNSprengCSoodN 2010 Private sector participation and health system performance in sub-saharan Africa. PLoS ONE 5 e13243 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013243

87. AghaSDoM 2008 Does an expansion in private sector contraceptive supply increase inequality in modern contraceptive use? Health Policy Plan 23 465 475

88. LoevinsohnBHardingA 2005 Buying results? Contracting for health service delivery in developing countries. Lancet 366 676 681

89. DeckerMMontaguD 2007 Reaching youth through franchise clinics: assessment of Kenyan private sector involvement in youth services. J Adolesc Health 40 280 282

90. FiedlerJLWightJB 2003 Privatization and the allure of franchising: a Zambian feasibility study. Int J Health Plann Manage 18 179 204

91. SchwartzJBBhushanI 2004 Improving immunization equity through a public-private partnership in Cambodia. Bull World Health Organ 82 661 667

92. MavalankarDSinghAPatelSRDesaiASinghPV 2009 Saving mothers and newborns through an innovative partnership with private sector obstetricians: Chiranjeevi scheme of Gujarat, India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107 271 276

93. BabarZDIzhamMI 2009 Effect of privatization of the drug distribution system on drug prices in Malaysia. Public Health 123 523 533

94. BroombergJDe BeerCPriceMR 1990 The private health sector in South Africa—current trends and future developments. S Afr Med J 78 139 142; discussion 142–133

95. PriceMR 1990 A comparison of prescribing patterns and consequent costs at Alexandra Health Centre and in the private fee-for-service medical aid sector. S Afr Med J 78 158 160

96. PatelVVaidyaRNaikDBorkerP 2005 Irrational drug use in India: a prescription survey from Goa. J Postgrad Med 51 9 12

97. LambertMLDelgadoRMichauxGVolzASpeybroeckN 2005 Delays to treatment and out-of-pocket medical expenditure for tuberculosis patients, in an urban area of South America. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 99 781 787

98. LambertMLDelgadoRMichauxGVolsASpeybroeckN 2005 Collaboration between private pharmacies and national tuberculosis programme: an intervention in Bolivia. Trop Med Int Health 10 246 250

99. International Finance Corporation 2007 The Business of health in Africa: partnering with the private sector to improve people's lives. Washington (District of Columbia): International Finance Corporation

100. MaigaFIHaddadSFournierPGauvinL 2003 Public and private sector responses to essential drugs policies: a multilevel analysis of drug prescription and selling practices in Mali. Soc Sci Med 57 937 948

101. SekhriNFeachemRNiA 2011 Public-private integrated partnerships demonstrate the potential to improve health care access, quality, and efficiency. Health Aff (Millwood) 30 1498 1507

102. ChabikuliNSchneiderHBlaauwDZwiABBrughaR 2002 Quality and equity of private sector care for sexually transmitted diseases in South Africa. Health Policy Plan 17 Suppl 40 46

103. StucklerDBasuSMcKeeM 2011 Health care capacity and allocations among South Africa's provinces: infrastructure-inequality traps after the end of apartheid. Am J Public Health 101 165 172

104. BirungiHMugishaFNsabagasaniXOkuonziSJeppssonA 2001 The policy on public-private mix in the Ugandan health sector: catching up with reality. Health Policy Plan 16 80 87

105. HensleyS 1999 Brazilian healthcare at a crossroads. Private sector flourishes as the government's program buckles under heavy demand, lack of funding. Mod Healthc 29 34 36, 38

106. SenguptaANundyS 2005 The private health sector in India. BMJ 331 1157 1158

107. De CostaADiwanV 2007 ‘Where is the public health sector?’ Public and private sector healthcare provision in Madhya Pradesh, India. Health Policy 84 269 276

108. World Bank 2009 New private equity fund launched to strengthen health care in Africa. Washington (District of Columbia): International Finance Corporation

109. BlackNBarkerMPayneM 2004 Cross sectional survey of multicentre clinical databases in the United Kingdom. London: BMJ 328 1478

110. PalmerN 2000 The use of private-sector contracts for primary health care: theory, evidence and lessons for low-income and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 78 821 829

111. CampbellSMReevesDKontopantelisESibbaldBRolandM 2009 Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. N Engl J Med 361 368 378

112. MaruDSSharmaAAndrewsJBasuSThapaJ 2009 Global health delivery 2.0: using open-access technologies for transparency and operations research. PLoS Med 6 e1000158 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000158

113. GoldMRSiegelJERussellLBWeinsteinMC 1996 Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press

114. World Health Organization 2011 World health statistics 2011. Available: http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_WHS2011_Full.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2012.