Why Do Women Not Use Antenatal Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies

English version České info

Background:
Almost 50% of women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) don't receive adequate antenatal care. Women's views can offer important insights into this problem. Qualitative studies exploring inadequate use of antenatal services have been undertaken in a range of countries, but the findings are not easily transferable. We aimed to inform the development of future antenatal care programmes through a synthesis of findings in all relevant qualitative studies.

Methods and Findings:
Using a predetermined search strategy, we identified robust qualitative studies reporting on the views and experiences of women in LMICs who received inadequate antenatal care. We used meta-ethnographic techniques to generate themes and a line-of-argument synthesis. We derived policy-relevant hypotheses from the findings. We included 21 papers representing the views of more than 1,230 women from 15 countries. Three key themes were identified: “pregnancy as socially risky and physiologically healthy”, “resource use and survival in conditions of extreme poverty”, and “not getting it right the first time”. The line-of-argument synthesis describes a dissonance between programme design and cultural contexts that may restrict access and discourage return visits. We hypothesize that centralised, risk-focused antenatal care programmes may be at odds with the resources, beliefs, and experiences of pregnant women who underuse antenatal services.

Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that there may be a misalignment between current antenatal care provision and the social and cultural context of some women in LMICs. Antenatal care provision that is theoretically and contextually at odds with local contextual beliefs and experiences is likely to be underused, especially when attendance generates increased personal risks of lost family resources or physical danger during travel, when the promised care is not delivered because of resource constraints, and when women experience covert or overt abuse in care settings.

Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary

Vyšlo v časopise: Why Do Women Not Use Antenatal Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. PLoS Med 10(1): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001373
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001373

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. HoganMC, ForemanKJ, NaghaviM, AhnSY, WangM, et al. (2010) Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980—2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet 375: 1609–1623.

2. United Nations (2011) The Millennium Development Goals report 2011. New York: United Nations.

3. United Nations (2000) United Nations millennium declaration. Fifty-fifth session of the United Nations General Assembly. New York: United Nations.

4. World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund, United Nations Population Fund, The World Bank (2010) Trends in maternal mortality: 1990–2008. Geneva: World Health Organization.

5. World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund (2012) Countdown to 2015: building a future for women and children—the 2012 report. Available: http://countdown2015mnch.org/documents/2012Report/2012-Complete.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2012.

6. CampbellO, GrahamW (2006) Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet 368: 1284–1299.

7. World Health Organization (2007) Standards for maternal and neonatal care. Geneva: World Health Organization.

8. RonsmansC, GrahamWJ (2006) Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet 368: 1189–1200.

9. CarroliG, RooneyC, VillarJ (2001) How effective is antenatal care in preventing maternal mortality and serious morbidity? An overview of the evidence. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 15 Suppl 11–42.

10. World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund (2003) Antenatal care in developing countries—promises, achievements and missed opportunities. Geneva: World Health Organization.

11. HouwelingTAJ, RonsmansC, CampbellOMR, KunstAE (2007) Huge poor-rich inequalities in maternity care: an international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 85: 745–754.

12. SimkhadaB, van TeijlingenER, PorterM, SimkhadaP (2008) Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 61: 244–260.

13. KabirM, IliyasuZ, AbubakarIS, SaniAA (2005) Determinants of utilization of antenatal care services in Kumbotso village, Northern Nigeria. Trop Doct 35: 110–111.

14. TrinhLTT, DibleyJM, BylesJ (2007) Determinants of antenatal care utilization in three rural areas of Vietnam. Public Health Nurs 24: 300–310.

15. BrownCA, SohaniSB, KhanK, LilfordR, MukhwanaW (2008) Antenatal care and perinatal outcomes in Kwale District, Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 8: 2 doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-2.

16. BasaniDG, SurkanPJ, OlintoMTA (2009) Inadequate use of prenatal services among Brazilian women: the role of maternal characteristics. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 35: 15–20.

17. AliAAA, OsmanMM, AbbakerAO, AdamI (2010) Use of antenatal care services in Kassala, eastern Sudan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10: 67 doi:10.1186-2393-10-67.

18. RoweRE, GarciaJ (2003) Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. J Public Health Med 25: 113–119.

19. DowneS, FinlaysonK, WalshD, LavenderT (2009) ‘Weighing up and balancing out’: a meta-synthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high-income countries'. BJOG 16: 518–529.

20. Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (2011) Saving mothers' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–08. The eighth report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 118 Suppl 11–203.

21. ThomsonG, DykesF, SinghG, CawleyL, DeyP (2012) A public health perspective of women's experiences of antenatal care: an exploration of insights from a community consultation. Midwifery E-pub ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.01.002.

22. VillarJ, Ba'aqeelH, PiaggioG, LumbiganonP, BelizánJM, et al. (2001) WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet 357: 1551–1564.

23. World Health Organization (2002) WHO antenatal care randomized trial: manual for the implementation of the new model. Geneva: World Health Organization.

24. US Agency for International Development (2007) Focused antenatal care: providing integrated, individualized care during pregnancy. Available: http://www.accesstohealth.org/toolres/pdfs/ACCESStechbrief_FANC.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2012.

25. BMJ Evidence Centre (2011) Best practice: routine antenatal care. Available: http://bestpractice.bmj.com/best-practice/monograph/493.html. Accessed 3 December 2012.

26. DowswellT, CarroliG, DuleyL, GatesS, GülmezogluAM, et al. (2010) Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010: CD000934 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000934.pub2.

27. Mathai M (2011 January 1) Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Geneva: The WHO Reproductive Health Library.

28. KyomuhendoGB (2003) Low use of rural maternity services in Uganda: impact of women's status, traditional beliefs and limited resources. Reprod Health Matters 11: 16–26.

29. RegmiK, MadisonJ (2009) Contemporary childbirth practices in Nepal: improving outcomes. Br J Midwifery 17: 382–387.

30. Amooti-KagunaB, NuwahaF (2000) Factors influencing choice of delivery sites in Rakai district of Uganda. Soc Sci Med 50: 203–213.

31. SandelowskiM (2006) Meta-jeopardy: the crisis of representation in qualitative metasynthesis. Nurs Outlook 54: 10–16.

32. Noyes J, Lewin S (2011 August) Supplemental guidance on selecting a method of qualitative evidence synthesis, and integrating qualitative evidence with Cochrane intervention reviews. In: Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, Harris J, et al.., editors. Supplementary guidance for inclusion of qualitative research in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions, version 1. Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group. Available: http://cqrmg.cochrane.org/supplemental-handbook-guidance Accessed 3 December 2012.

33. Noblit GW, Hare RD (1988) Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park (California): Sage.

34. SandelowskiM, DochertyS, EmdenC (1997) Qualitative meta-synthesis: issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health 20: 365–371.

35. WalshD, DowneS (2005) Meta-synthesis method of qualitative research: a literature review. J Adv Nurs 50: 204–211.

36. Dixon-WoodsM, AgarwalS, JonesD, YoungB, SuttonA (2005) Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 10: 45–53.

37. JensenLA, AllenMN (1996) Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qual Health Res 6: 553–560.

38. Ring N, Ritchie K, Mandava L, Jepson R (2010) A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews. Available: http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/programmes/clinical__cost_effectiveness/programme_resources/synthesising_research.aspx. Accessed 3 December 2012.

39. The World Bank (2010) Country and lending groups [database]. Available: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups. Accessed 3 December 2012.

40. DowneS, SimpsonL, TraffordK (2007) Expert intra-partum maternity care: a meta-synthesis. J Adv Nurs 27: 127–140.

41. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic enquiry. Newbury Park (California): Sage.

42. BrittenN, CampbellR, PopeC, DonovanJ, MorganM, et al. (2002) Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy 7: 209–215.

43. SmithLK, PopeC, BothaJL (2005) Patients' help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet 366: 825–831.

44. PoundP, BrittenN, MorganM, YardleyL, PopeC, et al. (2005) Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Soc Sci Med 61: 133–155.

45. NgomaneS, MulaudziFM (2012) Indigenous beliefs and practices that influence the delayed attendance of antenatal clinics by women in the Bohlabelo district in Limpopo, South Africa. Midwifery 28: 30–38.

46. AbrahamsN, JewkesR, MvoZ (2001) Health care-seeking practices of pregnant women and the role of the midwife in Cape Town, South Africa. J Midwifery Womens Health 46: 240–247.

47. MyerL, HarrisonA (2003) Why do women seek antenatal care late? Perspectives from rural South Africa. J Midwifery Womens Health 48: 268–272.

48. PretoriusCF, GreeffM (2004) Health service utilization by pregnant women in the greater Mafikeng-Mmabatho district. Curationis 27: 72–81.

49. MrishoM, ObristB, SchellenbergJA, HawsRA, MushiAK, et al. (2009) The use of antenatal and postnatal care: perspectives and experiences of women and health care providers in rural southern Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 9: 10 doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-10.

50. MatsuokaS, AigaH, RasmeyLC, RathavyT, OkitsuA (2010) Perceived barriers to utilization of maternal health services in rural Cambodia. Health Policy 95: 255–263.

51. ChoudhuryN, AhmedSM (2011) Maternal care practices among the ultra poor households in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative exploratory study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 11: 15 doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-15.

52. ChapmanRR (2003) Endangering safe motherhood in Mozambique: prenatal care as pregnancy risk. Soc Sci Med 57: 355–374.

53. Grossmann-KendallF, FilippiV, De KoninckM, KanhonouL (2001) Giving birth in maternity hospitals in Benin: testimonies of women. Reprod Health Matters 9: 90–98.

54. NdyomugyenyiR, NeemaS, MagnussenP (1998) The use of formal and informal services for antenatal care and malaria treatment in rural Uganda. Health Policy Plan 13: 94–102.

55. GcabaR, BrookesHB (1992) The un-booked maternity patient in an academic hospital in Durban. Curationis 15: 43–47.

56. AtuyambeL, MirembeF, JohanssonA, KirumiraEK, FaxelidE (2009) Seeking safety and empathy: adolescent health seeking behaviour during pregnancy and early motherhood in central Uganda. J Adolesc 32: 781–796.

57. StokesE, DumbayaI, OwensS, BrabinL (2008) The right to remain silent: a qualitative study of the medical and social ramifications of pregnancy disclosure for Gambian women. BJOG 115: 1641–1647.

58. GriffithsP, StephensonR (2001) Understanding users' perspectives of barriers to maternal health care use in Maharashtra, India. J Biosoc Sci 33: 339–359.

59. SimkhadaB, PorterMA, Van TeijlingenER (2010) The role of mothers-in-law in antenatal care decision-making in Nepal: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10: 34 doi:10.1186/1471-2393-10-34.

60. TitaleyCR, HunterCL, HeywoodP, DibleyMJ (2010) Why don't some women attend antenatal and postnatal care services?: a qualitative study of community members' perspectives in Garu, Sukambi and Ciamis districts of West Java Province, Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10: 61 doi:10.1186/1471-2393-10-61.

61. Family Care International (2003) Care seeking during pregnancy, delivery and the post-partum period: a study in Hombay and Migori districts, Kenya. New York: Family Care International. Available: http://www.familycareintl.org/UserFiles/File/SCI%20Kenya%20qualitative%20report.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2012.

62. Tinoco-OjangurenR, GlantzNM, Martinez-HernandezI, Ovando-MezaI (2008) Risk screening, emergency care, and lay concepts of complications during pregnancy in Chiapas, Mexico. Soc Sci Med 66: 1057–1069.

63. MumtazZ, SalwaySM (2007) Gender, pregnancy and the uptake of antenatal care services in Pakistan. Sociol Health Illn 29: 1–26 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00519.x.

64. Chowdhury AM, Mahbub A, Chowdhury AS (2003) Skilled attendance at delivery in Bangladesh: an ethnographic study. Research Monograph Series No. 22. Dhaka (Bangladesh): BRAC.

65. MubyaziGM, BlochP, MagnussenP, OlsenØE, ByskovJ, et al. (2010) Women's experiences and views about costs of seeking malaria chemoprevention and other antenatal services: a qualitative study from two districts in rural Tanzania. Malar J 9: 54 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-54.

66. Kabakian-KhasholianT, CampbellO, Shediac-RizkallahM, GhorayebF (2000) Women's experiences of maternity care: satisfaction or passivity? Soc Sci Med 51: 103–113.

67. PawsonR (1998) Caring communities, paradigm polemics, design debates. Evaluation 4: 73–90.

68. Statham A (1988) Women's approach to work: the creation of knowledge. In: Statham A, editor. The worth of women's work: a qualitative synthesis. Albany: State University of New York Press.

69. JohnsonA, GossA, BeckermanJ, CastroA (2012) Hidden costs: the direct and indirect impact of user fees on access to malaria treatment and primary care in Mali. Soc Sci Med 75: 1786–1792.

70. PerkinsM, BrazierE, ThemmenE, BassaneB, DialloD, et al. (2009) Out-of-pocket costs for facility-based maternity care in three African countries. Health Policy Plan 24: 289–300.

71. PandianJD, SrikanthV, ReadSJ, ThriftAG (2007) Poverty and stroke in India: a time to act. Stroke 38: 3063–3069.

72. RavindranTS (2012) Universal access: making health systems work for women. BMC Public Health 22 Suppl 1S4 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-S1-S4.

73. ThaddeusS, MaineD (1994) Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 38: 1091–1110.

74. GruskinS, MillsEJ, TarantolaD (2007) History, principles, and practice of health and human rights. Lancet 370: 449–455.

75. Bowser D, Hill K (2010) Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth: report of a landscape analysis. Washington (District of Columbia): US Agency for International Development. Available: http://www.tractionproject.org/sites/default/files/upload/RFA/Respectful%20Care%20at%20Birth%209-20-101%20Final.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2012.

76. White Ribbon Alliance (2011) Respectful maternity care: the universal rights of childbearing women. Available: http://www.whiteribbonalliance.org/WRA/assets/File/Final_RMC_Charter.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2012.

77. ManandharDS, OsrinD, ShresthaBP, MeskoN (2004) Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomized controlled trial. Lancet 364: 970–979.

78. SkinnerJ, RathavyT (2009) Design and evaluation of a community participatory birth preparedness project in Cambodia. Midwifery 25: 738–743.

79. LimS, DandonaL, HoisingtonJ, JamesS, HoganM, et al. (2010) India's Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. Lancet 375: 2009–2023.

80. PariyoGW, MayoraC, OkuiO, SsengoobaF, PetersDF, et al. (2011) Exploring new health markets: experiences of informal providers of transport for maternal health services in Eastern Uganda. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 11 Suppl 1S10 doi:10.1186/1472-698X-11-S1-S10.

81. PawsonR, GreenhalghT, HarveyG, WalsheK (2005) Realist review—a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 3 Suppl 121–34.