Effect of Household-Based Drinking Water Chlorination on Diarrhoea among Children under Five in Orissa, India: A Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial
Background:
Boiling, disinfecting, and filtering water within the home can improve the microbiological quality of drinking water among the hundreds of millions of people who rely on unsafe water supplies. However, the impact of these interventions on diarrhoea is unclear. Most studies using open trial designs have reported a protective effect on diarrhoea while blinded studies of household water treatment in low-income settings have found no such effect. However, none of those studies were powered to detect an impact among children under five and participants were followed-up over short periods of time. The aim of this study was to measure the effect of in-home water disinfection on diarrhoea among children under five.
Methods and Findings:
We conducted a double-blind randomised controlled trial between November 2010 and December 2011. The study included 2,163 households and 2,986 children under five in rural and urban communities of Orissa, India. The intervention consisted of an intensive promotion campaign and free distribution of sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) tablets during bi-monthly households visits. An independent evaluation team visited households monthly for one year to collect health data and water samples. The primary outcome was the longitudinal prevalence of diarrhoea (3-day point prevalence) among children aged under five. Weight-for-age was also measured at each visit to assess its potential as a proxy marker for diarrhoea. Adherence was monitored each month through caregiver's reports and the presence of residual free chlorine in the child's drinking water at the time of visit. On 20% of the total household visits, children's drinking water was assayed for thermotolerant coliforms (TTC), an indicator of faecal contamination. The primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Binomial regression with a log link function and robust standard errors was used to compare prevalence of diarrhoea between arms. We used generalised estimating equations to account for clustering at the household level. The impact of the intervention on weight-for-age z scores (WAZ) was analysed using random effect linear regression.
Over the follow-up period, 84,391 child-days of observations were recorded, representing 88% of total possible child-days of observation. The longitudinal prevalence of diarrhoea among intervention children was 1.69% compared to 1.74% among controls. After adjusting for clustering within household, the prevalence ratio of the intervention to control was 0.95 (95% CI 0.79–1.13). The mean WAZ was similar among children of the intervention and control groups (−1.586 versus −1.589, respectively). Among intervention households, 51% reported their child's drinking water to be treated with the tablets at the time of visit, though only 32% of water samples tested positive for residual chlorine. Faecal contamination of drinking water was lower among intervention households than controls (geometric mean TTC count of 50 [95% CI 44–57] per 100 ml compared to 122 [95% CI 107–139] per 100 ml among controls [p<0.001] [n = 4,546]).
Conclusions:
Our study was designed to overcome the shortcomings of previous double-blinded trials of household water treatment in low-income settings. The sample size was larger, the follow-up period longer, both urban and rural populations were included, and adherence and water quality were monitored extensively over time. These results provide no evidence that the intervention was protective against diarrhoea. Low compliance and modest reduction in water contamination may have contributed to the lack of effect. However, our findings are consistent with other blinded studies of similar interventions and raise additional questions about the actual health impact of household water treatment under these conditions.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01202383
Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Vyšlo v časopise:
Effect of Household-Based Drinking Water Chlorination on Diarrhoea among Children under Five in Orissa, India: A Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial. PLoS Med 10(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001497
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001497
Souhrn
Background:
Boiling, disinfecting, and filtering water within the home can improve the microbiological quality of drinking water among the hundreds of millions of people who rely on unsafe water supplies. However, the impact of these interventions on diarrhoea is unclear. Most studies using open trial designs have reported a protective effect on diarrhoea while blinded studies of household water treatment in low-income settings have found no such effect. However, none of those studies were powered to detect an impact among children under five and participants were followed-up over short periods of time. The aim of this study was to measure the effect of in-home water disinfection on diarrhoea among children under five.
Methods and Findings:
We conducted a double-blind randomised controlled trial between November 2010 and December 2011. The study included 2,163 households and 2,986 children under five in rural and urban communities of Orissa, India. The intervention consisted of an intensive promotion campaign and free distribution of sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) tablets during bi-monthly households visits. An independent evaluation team visited households monthly for one year to collect health data and water samples. The primary outcome was the longitudinal prevalence of diarrhoea (3-day point prevalence) among children aged under five. Weight-for-age was also measured at each visit to assess its potential as a proxy marker for diarrhoea. Adherence was monitored each month through caregiver's reports and the presence of residual free chlorine in the child's drinking water at the time of visit. On 20% of the total household visits, children's drinking water was assayed for thermotolerant coliforms (TTC), an indicator of faecal contamination. The primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Binomial regression with a log link function and robust standard errors was used to compare prevalence of diarrhoea between arms. We used generalised estimating equations to account for clustering at the household level. The impact of the intervention on weight-for-age z scores (WAZ) was analysed using random effect linear regression.
Over the follow-up period, 84,391 child-days of observations were recorded, representing 88% of total possible child-days of observation. The longitudinal prevalence of diarrhoea among intervention children was 1.69% compared to 1.74% among controls. After adjusting for clustering within household, the prevalence ratio of the intervention to control was 0.95 (95% CI 0.79–1.13). The mean WAZ was similar among children of the intervention and control groups (−1.586 versus −1.589, respectively). Among intervention households, 51% reported their child's drinking water to be treated with the tablets at the time of visit, though only 32% of water samples tested positive for residual chlorine. Faecal contamination of drinking water was lower among intervention households than controls (geometric mean TTC count of 50 [95% CI 44–57] per 100 ml compared to 122 [95% CI 107–139] per 100 ml among controls [p<0.001] [n = 4,546]).
Conclusions:
Our study was designed to overcome the shortcomings of previous double-blinded trials of household water treatment in low-income settings. The sample size was larger, the follow-up period longer, both urban and rural populations were included, and adherence and water quality were monitored extensively over time. These results provide no evidence that the intervention was protective against diarrhoea. Low compliance and modest reduction in water contamination may have contributed to the lack of effect. However, our findings are consistent with other blinded studies of similar interventions and raise additional questions about the actual health impact of household water treatment under these conditions.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01202383
Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Zdroje
1. BlackRE, CousensS, JohnsonHL, LawnJE, RudanI, et al. (2010) Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysis. Lancet 375: 1969–1987.
2. WHO, UNICEF (2010) Progress on sanitation and drinking-water: 2010 Update. Geneva.
3. NEERI (2004) Potable water quality assessment in some major cities in India. JIPHE, India. 65 p.
4. Properzi F (2010) Rapid assessment of drinking water quality. Stockholm World Water Conference. Stockholm, Sweden.
5. WrightJ, GundryS, ConroyR (2004) Household drinking water in developing countries: a systematic review of microbiological contamination between source and point-of-use. Trop Med Int Health 9: 106–117.
6. FewtrellL, KaufmannRB, KayD, EnanoriaW, HallerL, et al. (2005) Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 5: 42–52.
7. ArnoldBF, ColfordJMJr (2007) Treating water with chlorine at point-of-use to improve water quality and reduce child diarrhea in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76: 354–364.
8. ClasenT, RobertsI, RabieT, SchmidtW, CairncrossS (2006) Interventions to improve water quality for preventing diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3: CD004794.
9. UNICEF/WHO (2009) Diarrhoea: Why children are still dying and what can be done. Geneva: WHO.
10. Waddington H, Snilstveit BS, White H, Fewtrell L (2009) Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to combat childhood diarrhoea in developing countries. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie). New Delhi.
11. JainS, SahanoonOK, BlantonE, SchmitzA, WannemuehlerKA, et al. (2010) Sodium dichloroisocyanurate tablets for routine treatment of household drinking water in periurban Ghana: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82: 16–22.
12. Austin (1993) Investigations of in-house water chlorination and its effectiveness for rural areas of the Gambia [PhD dissertation]. New Orleans (Louisiana): Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine.
13. KirchhoffLV, McClellandKE, Do Carmo PinhoM, AraujoJG, De SousaMA, et al. (1985) Feasibility and efficacy of in-home water chlorination in rural North-eastern Brazil. J Hyg (Lond) 94: 173–180.
14. SchmidtWP, CairncrossS (2009) Household water treatment in poor populations: is there enough evidence for scaling up now? Environ Sci Technol 43: 986–992.
15. ClasenT, BartramJ, ColfordJ, LubyS, QuickR, et al. (2009) Comment on “Household water treatment in poor populations: is there enough evidence for scaling up now?”. Environ Sci Technol 43: 5542–5544; author reply 5545–5546.
16. BoissonS, KiyomboM, SthreshleyL, TumbaS, MakamboJ, et al. (2010) Field assessment of a novel household-based water filtration device: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in the Democratic Republic of Congo. PLoS One 5: e12613 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012613
17. ClasenT, EdmondsonP (2006) Sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) tablets as an alternative to sodium hypochlorite for the routine treatment of drinking water at the household level. Int J Hyg Environ Health 209: 173–181.
18. WHO/UNICEF (2004) Guidelines for drinking water quality. Geneva: World Health Organization.
19. MorrisSS, CousensSN, KirkwoodBR, ArthurP, RossDA (1996) Is prevalence of diarrhea a better predictor of subsequent mortality and weight gain than diarrhea incidence? Am J Epidemiol 144: 582–588.
20. SchmidtWP, ArnoldBF, BoissonS, GenserB, LubySP, et al. (2011) Epidemiological methods in diarrhoea studies–an update. Int J Epidemiol 40: 1678–1692.
21. BaquiAH, BlackRE, YunusM, HoqueAR, ChowdhuryHR, et al. (1991) Methodological issues in diarrhoeal diseases epidemiology: definition of diarrhoeal episodes. Int J Epidemiol 20: 1057–1063.
22. SchmidtWP, BoissonS, GenserB, BarretoM, BaisleyK, et al. (2009) Weight-for-age z-score as a proxy marker for diarrhoea in epidemiological studies. J Epidemiol Community Health
23. WHO (2008) WHO child growth standards: training course on child growth assessment. Geneva: WHO.
24. UlijaszekSJ, KerrDA (1999) Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr 82: 165–177.
25. WHO (2008) WHO Anthro Software. Geneva: WHO.
26. APHA editor (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edition. Washington, (D.C.): APHA.
27. JamesKE, BlochDA, LeeKK, KraemerHC, FullerRK (1996) An index for assessing blindness in a multi-centre clinical trial: disulfiram for alcohol cessation–a VA cooperative study. Stat Med 15: 1421–1434.
28. BangH, NiL, DavisCE (2004) Assessment of blinding in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 25: 143–156.
29. HunterPR (2009) Household water treatment in developing countries: comparing different intervention types using meta-regression. Environ Sci Technol 43: 8991–8997.
30. MausezahlD, ChristenA, PachecoGD, TellezFA, IriarteM, et al. (2009) Solar drinking water disinfection (SODIS) to reduce childhood diarrhoea in rural Bolivia: a cluster-randomized, controlled trial. PLoS Med 6: e1000125 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000125
31. SchmidtWP, GenserB, ChalabiZ (2009) A simulation model for diarrhoea and other common recurrent infections: a tool for exploring epidemiological methods. Epidemiol Infect 137: 644–653.
32. MoherD, HopewellS, SchulzKF, MontoriV, GotzschePC, et al. (2012) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 10: 28–55.
33. HanleyJA, NegassaA, EdwardesMD, ForresterJE (2003) Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. Am J Epidemiol 157: 364–375.
34. Hayes J, Moulton L (2009) Cluster randomised trials: Boca Raton (Florida): Chapman & Hall CRC
35. SchmidtWP, BoissonS, GenserB, BarretoML, BaisleyK, et al. (2010) Weight-for-age z-score as a proxy marker for diarrhoea in epidemiological studies. J Epidemiol Community Health 64: 1074–1079.
36. HunterPR, Zmirou-NavierD, HartemannP (2009) Estimating the impact on health of poor reliability of drinking water interventions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 407: 2621–2624.
37. BrownJ, ClasenT (2012) High adherence is necessary to realize health gains from water quality interventions. PLoS One 7: e36735 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036735
38. RellerME, MendozaCE, LopezMB, AlvarezM, HoekstraRM, et al. (2003) A randomized controlled trial of household-based flocculant-disinfectant drinking water treatment for diarrhea prevention in rural Guatemala. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69: 411–419.
39. ClasenT, SaeedTF, BoissonS, EdmondsonP, ShipinO (2007) Household water treatment using sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) tablets: a randomized, controlled trial to assess microbiological effectiveness in Bangladesh. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76: 187–192.
40. ArnoldB, AranaB, MausezahlD, HubbardA, ColfordJMJr (2009) Evaluation of a pre-existing, 3-year household water treatment and handwashing intervention in rural Guatemala. Int J Epidemiol 38: 1651–1661.
41. BanerjeeA, McFarlandDA, SinghR, QuickR (2007) Cost and financial sustainability of a household-based water treatment and storage intervention in Zambia. J Water Health 5: 385–394.
42. RosaG, ClasenT (2010) Estimating the scope of household water treatment in low- and medium-income countries. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82: 289–300.
43. LubyS, AgboatwallaM, RazaA, SobelJ, MintzE, et al. (2001) A low-cost intervention for cleaner drinking water in Karachi, Pakistan. Int J Infect Dis 5: 144–150.
44. ClasenTF, BrownJ, CollinS, SunturaO, CairncrossS (2004) Reducing diarrhea through the use of household-based ceramic water filters: a randomized, controlled trial in rural Bolivia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70: 651–657.
45. GundryS, WrightJ, ConroyR (2004) A systematic review of the health outcomes related to household water quality in developing countries. J Water Health 2: 1–13.
46. BrownJM, ProumS, SobseyMD (2008) Escherichia coli in household drinking water and diarrheal disease risk: evidence from Cambodia. Water Sci Technol 58: 757–763.
47. ClasenT, SchmidtWP, RabieT, RobertsI, CairncrossS (2007) Interventions to improve water quality for preventing diarrhoea: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 334: 782.
48. EisenbergJN, ScottJC, PorcoT (2007) Integrating disease control strategies: balancing water sanitation and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrheal disease burden. Am J Public Health 97: 846–852.
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2013 Číslo 8
- Statiny indukovaná myopatie: Jak na diferenciální diagnostiku?
- MUDr. Dana Vondráčková: Hepatopatie sú pri liečbe metamizolom väčším strašiakom ako agranulocytóza
- Vztah mezi statiny a rizikem vzniku nádorových onemocnění − metaanalýza
- Nech brouka žít… Ať žije astma!
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Switching HIV Treatment in Adults Based on CD4 Count Versus Viral Load Monitoring: A Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial in Thailand
- Risk of Early-Onset Neonatal Infection with Maternal Infection or Colonization: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Inclusion of Ethical Issues in Dementia Guidelines: A Thematic Text Analysis
- Country Contextualization of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide: A Case Study from Nigeria