Conveying Equipoise during Recruitment for Clinical Trials: Qualitative Synthesis of Clinicians’ Practices across Six Randomised Controlled Trials

English version České info

In a qualitative synthesis from six randomized controlled trials, Leila Rooshenas and colleagues examine how clinicians convey equipoise during recruitment for clinical trials.

Vyšlo v časopise: Conveying Equipoise during Recruitment for Clinical Trials: Qualitative Synthesis of Clinicians’ Practices across Six Randomised Controlled Trials. PLoS Med 13(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002147
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002147

Souhrn

In a qualitative synthesis from six randomized controlled trials, Leila Rooshenas and colleagues examine how clinicians convey equipoise during recruitment for clinical trials.

Zdroje

1. Toerien M, Brookes ST, Metcalfe C, De Salis I, Tomlin Z, Peters TJ, et al. A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals. Trials. 2009;10:52. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-52 19591685

2. Kasenda B, Von Elm E, You J, Blümle A, Tomonaga Y, Saccilotto R, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials. JAMA. 2014;311:1045–1052. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1361 24618966

3. Kitterman DR, Cheng SK, Dilts DM, Orwoll ES. The prevalence and economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at an academic medical center. Acad Med. 2011;86:1360. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182306440 21952064

4. Donovan JL, de Salis I, Toerien M, Paramasivan S, Hamdy FC, Blazeby JM. The intellectual challenges and emotional consequences of equipoise contributed to the fragility of recruitment in six randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:912–920. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.010 24811157

5. Chard J, Lilford R. The use of equipoise in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:891–898. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00153-1 9722109

6. Djulbegovic B. The paradox of equipoise: the principle that drives and limits therapeutic discoveries in clinical research. Cancer Control. 2009;16:342–347. 19910921

7. Horton R. Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers. Lancet. 1996;347:984–985. doi: 10.5555/uri:pii:S0140673696901373 8606606

8. Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:141–145. doi: 10.1056/nejm198707163170304 3600702

9. Miller FG, Brody H. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Hastings Cent Rep. 2003;33:19–28. doi: 10.2307/3528434 12854452

10. Djulbegovic B, Lacevic M, Cantor A, Fields KK, Bennett CL, Adams JR, et al. The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research. Lancet. 2000;356:635–638. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02605-2 10968436

11. Madsen S, Holm S, Riis P. Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach. J Med Ethics. 2007;33:234–240. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.015255 17400624

12. Jackson CJ, Dixon-Woods M, Eborall H, Kenyon S, Tooz-Hobson P, Tincello D. Women’s views and experiences of a patient preference trial in surgery: a qualitative study of the CARPET1 trial. Clin Trials. 2010;7:696–704. doi: 10.1177/1740774510381286 20729253

13. Mills N, Donovan JL, Smith M, Jacoby A, Neal DE, Hamdy FC. Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24:272–282. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00020-5 12757993

14. Harrop E, Kelly J, Griffiths G, Casbard A, Nelson A. Why do patients decline surgical trials? Findings from a qualitative interview study embedded in the Cancer Research UK BOLERO trial (Bladder cancer: Open versus Lapararoscopic or RObotic cystectomy). Trials. 2016;17:35. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1173-z 26787177

15. Taylor KM. Integrating conflicting professional roles: physician participation in randomized clinical trials. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35:217–224. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90169-q 1509310

16. Lawton J, Kirkham J, White D, Rankin D, Cooper C, Heller S. Uncovering the emotional aspects of working on a clinical trial: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of staff involved in a type 1 diabetes trial. Trials. 2015;16:3. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-16-3 25566971

17. Potter S, Mills N, Cawthorn SJ, Donovan J, Blazeby JM. Time to be BRAVE: is educating surgeons the key to unlocking the potential of randomised clinical trials in surgery? A qualitative study. Trials. 2014;15:80. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-80 24628821

18. Eborall HC, Dallosso HM, Daly H, Martin-Stacey L, Heller SR. The face of equipoise—delivering a structured education programme within a randomized controlled trial: qualitative study. Trials. 2014;15:6215–6215. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-15 24405854

19. Miller FG, Joffe S. Equipoise and the dilemma of randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:476. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1011301 21288100

20. Weijer C, Shapiro SH, Glass KC, Enkin MW. Clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2000;321:756–759. 10999914

21. University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine. Qualitative Research Integrated within Trials (QuinteT). 2016 [cited 8 Jun 2016]. Available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/social-community-medicine/research/groups/social-sciences-health/quintet/.

22. Donovan JL, Rooshenas L, Jepson M, Elliott D, Wade J, Avery K, et al. Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI). Trials. 2016;17:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1391-4 27278130

23. Rogers CA, Welbourn R, Byrne J, Donovan JL, Reeves BC, Wordsworth S, et al. The By-Band study: gastric bypass or adjustable gastric band surgery to treat morbid obesity: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot phase. Trials. 2014;15:53. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-53 24517309

24. Birtle AJ, Lewis R, Johnson M, Hall E. Time to define an international standard of postoperative care for resected upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC)—opening of the peri‐operative chemotherapy versus surveillance in upper tract urothelial cancer (POUT) Trial. BJU Int. 2012;110:919–921. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11413.x 22882350

25. Bartlett J, Canney P, Campbell A, Cameron D, Donovan J, Dunn J, et al. Selecting breast cancer patients for chemotherapy: the opening of the UK OPTIMA trial. Clin Oncol. 2013;25:109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.10.005 23267818

26. Rudarakanchana N, Dialynas M, Halliday A. Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2): rationale for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38:239–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.05.010 19540137

27. Beard D, Rees J, Rombach I, Cooper C, Cook J, Merritt N, et al. The CSAW Study (Can Shoulder Arthroscopy Work?)—a placebo-controlled surgical intervention trial assessing the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthroscopic subacromial decompression for shoulder pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:210. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0725-y 25956385

28. Blazeby J, Strong S, Donovan J, Wilson C, Hollingworth W, Crosby T, et al. Feasibility RCT of definitive chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy and surgery for oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:234–240. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.313 24921919

29. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.

30. Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T, et al. Quality improvement report: improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. BMJ. 2002:766–769. 12364308

31. Hamilton D, De Salis I, Donovan J, Birchall M. The recruitment of patients to trials in head and neck cancer: a qualitative study of the EaStER trial of treatments for early laryngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:2333–2337. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2349-8 23334205

32. Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Souhami A, Sawtell M. How do doctors explain randomised clinical trials to their patients? Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:1187–1193. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00116-1 10615228

33. Byrne-Davis LM, Salmon P, Gravenhorst K, Eden TO, Young B. Balancing high accrual and ethical recruitment in paediatric oncology: a qualitative study of the’look and feel’of clinical trial discussions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-101 20969763

34. Brown R, Butow P, Boyle F, Tattersall M. Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials; evaluating the efficacy of doctor communication skills training. Psychooncology. 2007;16:507–516. 16986176

35. Garcia J, Elbourne D, Snowdon C. Equipoise: a case study of the views of clinicians involved in two neonatal trials. Clin Trials. 2004;1:170–178. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn020xx 16281889

36. Han PK, Klein WM, Arora NK. Varieties of uncertainty in health care a conceptual taxonomy. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:828–838. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11393976 22067431

37. Griffiths F, Green E, Tsouroufli M. The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: qualitative study. BMJ. 2005;330:511. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38336.482720.8F 15684026

38. Pickles K, Carter SM, Rychetnik L, McCaffery K, Entwistle VA. General practitioners’ experiences of, and responses to, uncertainty in prostate cancer screening: insights from a qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0153299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153299 27100402

39. Tarn DM, Paterniti DA, Wenger NS. Provider recommendations in the face of scientific uncertainty: an analysis of audio-recorded discussions about vitamin D. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:909–917. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3667-5 27008650

40. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:892–899. 11141876

41. Diamond-Brown L. The doctor-patient relationship as a toolkit for uncertain clinical decisions. Soc Sci Med. 2016;159:108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.002 27179146

42. Donovan JL, Paramasivan S, de Salis I, Toerien M. Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2014;15:5. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-5 24393291

43. Kurzrock R, Stewart DJ. Equipoise abandoned? Randomization and clinical trials. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2471–2474. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt358 24072520

44. Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Solis-Trapala I, Langridge C, Farewell V. Discussing randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy: evaluation of a Cancer Research UK training programme. BMJ. 2005;330:400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38366.562685.8F 15705666

45. Paramasivan S, Strong S, Wilson C, Campbell B, Blazeby JM, Donovan JL. A simple technique to identify key recruitment issues in randomised controlled trials: Q-QAT—Quanti-Qualitative Appointment Timing. Trials. 2015;16:88. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0617-1 25873096