First-Year Evaluation of Mexico’s Tax on Nonessential Energy-Dense Foods: An Observational Study

English version České info

Why Was This Study Done?

In January 2014, Mexico passed an 8% tax on nonessential foods with energy density ≥275 kcal/100 g, including salty snacks, chips, cakes, pastries, and frozen desserts; and a 1 peso/liter (~10%) tax on sugar-sweetened beverages.

To date, there has been very limited research as to how larger health-related food/beverage taxes change household food purchases, or whether low socioeconomic status (SES) households are more responsive to such taxes.

What Did the Researchers Do and Find?

Using a dataset that follows household food purchases over time, we examined whether the volume of taxed foods showed greater declines in the post-tax period than we would have expected based on trends in the volume of taxed food purchases prior to the tax. We also examined whether post-tax changes in the volume of taxed food purchases was greater among low SES households.

We found that the mean volume of purchases of taxed foods in 2014 declined by 25 g per capita per month, or a 5.1% change beyond what would have been expected based on pre-tax (2012–2013) trends.

There were no changes in the purchase of untaxed foods in the post-tax period.

Low SES households’ purchases of taxed foods declined by 10.2% and medium SES households by 5.8%, whereas high SES did not change.

What Do These Findings Mean?

These findings show that in the post-tax period, purchases of taxed foods declined more than we would expect if pre-tax trends had simply continued, particularly among low and medium SES households. Future research should explore how these shifts are linked to changes in the nutritional quality of the overall diet.

Vyšlo v časopise: First-Year Evaluation of Mexico’s Tax on Nonessential Energy-Dense Foods: An Observational Study. PLoS Med 13(7): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002057
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002057

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. Rivera JA, de Cossio TG, Pedraza LS, Aburto TC, Sanchez TG, Martorell R. Childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity in Latin America: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(4):321–32. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70173-6 24703050

2. Barquera S, Campos-Nonato I, Hernández-Barrera L, Pedroza A, Rivera-Dommarco JA. Prevalence of obesity in Mexican adults 2000–2012. Salud publica de Mexico. 2013;55:S151–S60. 24626691

3. Villalpando S, de la Cruz V, Rojas R, Shamah-Levy T, Ávila MA, Gaona B, et al. Prevalence and distribution of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Mexican adult population: a probabilistic survey. Salud Pública de Méx. 2010;52:S19–S26.

4. Stern D, Piernas C, Barquera S, Rivera JA, Popkin BM. Caloric Beverages Were Major Sources of Energy among Children and Adults in Mexico, 1999–2012. J Nutr. 2014;144(6):949–956. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.190652 24744311

5. Barquera S, Campirano F, Bonvecchio A, Hernández L, Rivera J, Popkin B. Caloric beverage consumption patterns in Mexican children. Nutr J. 2010;9:47–56. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-47 20964842

6. Barquera S, Hernandez-Barrera L, Tolentino ML, Espinosa J, Ng SW, Rivera JA, et al. Energy intake from beverages is increasing among Mexican adolescents and adults. J Nutr. 2008;138(12):2454–61. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.092163 19022972

7. Hawkes C. Uneven dietary development: linking the policies and processes of globalization with the nutrition transition, obesity and diet-related chronic diseases. Global Health. 2006;2(1):4.

8. Pan American Health Organization. Ultra-processed food and drink products in Latin America: Trends, impact on obesity, policy implications. 2015. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11153%3Aultra-processed-food-and-drink-products&catid=4999%3Aactive-living-documents&lang=en

9. Pedraza L, Aburto T, Sánchez T, Rivera J. Contribution of food groups to the total dietary energy intake of Mexican children, adolescents and adults. FASEB J. 2014;28:393.3

10. Jensen JD, Smed S. The Danish tax on saturated fat–Short run effects on consumption, substitution patterns and consumer prices of fats. Food Policy. 2013;42(0):18–31.

11. Bíró A. Did the junk food tax make the Hungarians eat healthier? Food Policy. 2015;54:107–15.

12. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografia, empleo Endoy. Indicadores Estratégicos 2014 [cited July 2015]. http://www3.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/temas/default.aspx?s=est&c=25433&t=1.

13. Comisión Nacional de los Salarios Mínimos. Tabla de Salarios Mínimos Generales y Profesionales por áreas geográficas [cited July 2015]. http://www.conasami.gob.mx/t_sal_mini_prof.html.

14. Colchero A, Rivera JA, Popkin BM, Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016;352(h6704).

15. Ng SW, Popkin BM. The Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation Pledge. Am J Prev Med.47(4):520–30. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.030 25240968

16. Taillie L, Ng S, Popkin B. Gains made by Walmart’s healthier food initiative mirror preexisting trends. Health Affair. 2015;34(11):1869–76.

17. Manning WG, Mullahy J. Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? Journal of health economics. 2001;20(4):461–94. 11469231

18. Belotti F, Deb P, Manning WG, Norton EC. twopm: Two-part models. Stata Journal. 2015;15(1):3–20.

19. Donaldson E. Advocating for sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: a case study of Mexico 2015 [September 1, 2015]. http://www.jhsph.edu/departments/health-behavior-and-society/_pdf/Advocating_For_Sugar_Sweetened_Beverage_Taxation.pdf.

20. Cooper B. How soda is drawing fire from food in Mexico obesity battle. Just Food. August 24, 2015. [cited 2016 March 25]. http://www.just-food.com/analysis/how-soda-is-drawing-fire-from-food-in-mexico-obesity-battle_id130918.aspx.

21. Colchero M, Salgado J, Unar M, Hernández-Ávila M, Rivera-Dommarco J. Price elasticity of the demand for sugar sweetened beverages and soft drinks in Mexico. Economics & Human Biology. 2015;19:129–37.

22. Colchero A, Rivera JA, Popkin BM, Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores since the start of the Mexican Sugar-Sweetened Beverage excise tax: A year out. BMJ. 2015;In press.

23. Rivera Dommarco JA, Campos-Nonato I, Barquera Cervera S, Gonzalez de Cossio T. Epidemiología de la obesidad en México: magnitud, distribución, tendencias y factores de riesgo. Obesidad en México: recomendaciones para una política de Estado. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2012.

24. Cash S, Lacanilao RD. Taxing food to improve health: economic evidence and arguments. J Agr Resour Econ. 2007;36(2):174.

25. Andreyeva T, Long MW, Brownell KD. The impact of food prices on consumption: A systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. Am J Public Health. 2009;100(2):216–22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.151415 20019319

26. Brunner-Brown JA. “Fat Taxes” Fighting Globesity Ignore Food Demand Inelasticities. Ann Surv Int'l & Comp L. 2015;20(1):13.

27. Popkin BM, Hawkes C. The sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends and implications for diabetes prevention. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;4(2):174–86. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00419-2

28. Secretaría de Salud. Estrategia Nacional para la Prevención y el Control del Sobrepeso, la Obesidad y la Diabetes. [National Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Overweight, Obesity and Diabetes] Mexico, D.F.; 2013.

29. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografia. Encuesta Nacional de Ingreso y Gastos de los Hogares. [National Household Income and Expenditure Survey]. 2008, 2010, 1012, 1014 [cited 2015 July 1]. www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/Proyectos/encuestas/hogares/regulares/enigh.