Implementation science: Relevance in the real world without sacrificing rigor

English version České info

Three members of PLOS Medicine's editorial board who are leading researchers in implementation science define the characteristics of high-quality studies and invite their submission to the journal.

Vyšlo v časopise: Implementation science: Relevance in the real world without sacrificing rigor. PLoS Med 14(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002288
Kategorie: Editorial
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002288

Souhrn

Three members of PLOS Medicine's editorial board who are leading researchers in implementation science define the characteristics of high-quality studies and invite their submission to the journal.

Zdroje

1. Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science. 2006;1(1):1.

2. Anderson N, Herriot P, Hodgkinson GP. The practitioner‐researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2001;74(4):391–411.

3. Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Evaluation & the health professions. 2006;29(1):126–53.

4. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 21195583

5. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7. 10474547

6. Sarna A, Luchters S, Geibel S, Chersich MF, Munyao P, Kaai S, et al. Short- and long-term efficacy of modified directly observed antiretroviral treatment in Mombasa, Kenya: a randomized trial. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2008;48(5):611–9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181806bf1 18645509

7. Sturke R, Harmston C, Simonds RJ, Mofenson LM, Siberry GK, Watts DH, et al. A multi-disciplinary approach to implementation science: the NIH-PEPFAR PMTCT implementation science alliance. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2014;67 Suppl 2:S163–7.

8. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):139.

9. Pinnock H. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement. BMJ. 2017;356:i6795. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6795 28264797

10. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2014;348:g1687.

11. French SD, McKenzie JE, O'Connor DA, Grimshaw JM, Mortimer D, Francis JJ, et al. Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065471 23785427

12. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2015;350:h1258.

13. Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt M, Landsverk J. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2011;38(1):44–53. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z 20967495

14. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2011;38(2):65–76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 20957426

15. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):42.

16. Pronyk PM, Muniz M, Nemser B, Somers MA, McClellan L, Palm CA, et al. The effect of an integrated multisector model for achieving the Millennium Development Goals and improving child survival in rural sub-Saharan Africa: a non-randomised controlled assessment. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2179–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60207-4 22572602

17. Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2000;11(5):550–60. 10955408

18. Parry G, Power M. To RCT or not to RCT? The ongoing saga of randomised trials in quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(4):221–3. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004862 26545704

19. Berwick DM. The science of improvement. Jama. 2008;299(10):1182–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.10.1182 18334694

20. Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2015;350:h2147.

21. Hemming K, Haines T, Chilton P, Girling A, Lilford R. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2015;350:h391.

22. The PLoS Medicine Editors. Prescription for a healthy journal. PLoS Med. 2004;1(1):e22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010022 17523248