Praktický průvodce pro úspěšný rozvoj programu robotické břišní chirurgie: cesta k realizaci

Autoři popisují současnou situaci v roboticky asistovaných operacích. Nejdůležitějšími aspekty úspěšného zavedení robotického programu je trpělivost a flexibilita. Cílem je spokojený pacient, návrat funkcí a snížení perioperační bolesti. Nicméně cesta rozvoje metody je ještě dlouhá.

Klíčová slova:
robot − abdominal surgery – program − development

Autoři: Z. Jutric; S. Warner; Y. Fong
Působiště autorů: Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte CA
Vyšlo v časopise: Rozhl. Chir., 2017, roč. 96, č. 2, s. 49-53.
Kategorie: Souhrnné sdělení

Souhrn

Klíčová slova:
robot − abdominal surgery – program − development

Zdroje

1. Satava RM. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:6−16.

2. Lee KF, Cheung YS, Chong CC, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre. ANZ J Surg 2016;86:122−6.

3. Kingham TP, Leung U, Kuk D, et al. Robotic liver resection: A Case-matched comparison. World J Surg 2016;40:1422−8.

4. Nota CL, Rinkes IH, Molenaar IQ, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and pooled analysis of minor and major hepatectomies. HPB (Oxford) 2016;18:113−20.

5. Collin C, Bellas N, Haddock P, et al. Pre-operative education classes prior to robotic prostatectomy benefit both patients and clinicians. Urol Nurs 2015;35:281−5.

6. Palmer KJ, Lowe GJ, Coughlin GD, et al. Launching a successful robotic surgery program. J Endourol 2008;22:819−24.

7. Chen PD, Wu CY, Hu RH, et al. Robotic major hepatectomy: Is there a learning curve? Surgery 2016, [In Press].

8. Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, et al. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA surgery 2015;150:416−22.

9. Hung AJ, Patil MB, Zehnder P, et al. Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol 2012;187:630−7.

10. Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W, 3rd, et al. A da Vinci robot system can make sense for a mature laparoscopic prostatectomy program. JSLS 2008;12:9−12.

11. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, et al. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 2004;239:14−21.

12. Bell S, Carne P, Chin M, Farmer C. Establishing a robotic colorectal surgery programme. ANZ J Surg 2015;85:214−6.

13. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003;138:777−84.

14. Korets R, Mues AC, Graversen JA, et al. Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents. Urology 2011;78:1326−30.

15. Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, et al. Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2016;5:311−21.

16. Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, et al. The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB (Oxford) 2015;17:580−6.

17. Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M. From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int. 2011;108:1708−13; discussion 14.

18. Leung U, Fong Y. Robotic liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2014;3:288−94.

19. Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Taskin HE, et al. Malfunction and failure of robotic systems during general surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 2012;26:3580−3.

20. Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonte F, et al. Reliability of robotic system during general surgical procedures in a university hospital. Am J Surg 2014;207:84−8.

21. Kim WT, Ham WS, Jeong W, et al. Failure and malfunction of da Vinci surgical systems during various robotic surgeries: experience from six departments at a single institute. Urology. 2009;74:1234−7.

22. Yuh B, Yu X, Raytis J, et al. Use of a mobile tower-based robot:The initial Xi robot experience in surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 2016;113:5−7.