Repeated thrombectomy in a patient with a rare combination of etiological factors

Česká verzia

Authors: M. Mako ¹; G. Krastev ¹; J. Haring ¹; J. Cisár ¹; A. Klepanec ²; J. Haršány ²; P. Blaško ³; P. Kurray ³
Authors place of work: Neurologické oddelenie, FN Trnava, Slovensko ¹; Radiologická klinika FN Trnava, Slovensko ²; Kardiocentrum Nitra, Slovensko ³
Published in the journal: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2020; 83(2): 209-211
Category: Letter to Editor
doi: https://doi.org/10.14735/amcsnn2020csnn.eu1

Summary

The Editorial Board declares that the manu script met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.

Zdroje

1. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH et al. HERMES collaborators: endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016; 387(10029): 1723–1731. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X.

2. Mohan KM, Wolfe CD, Rudd AG et al. Risk and cumulative risk of stroke recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2011; 42(5): 1489–1494. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.602615.

3. Mordachini PJ, Kaesmacher J, Gautschi D et al. Predictors of unexpected early reocclusion after successful mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients. Stroke 2018; 49(11): 2643–2651. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021685.

4. Bouslama M, Haussen DC, Rebello LC et al. Repeated mechanical thrombectomy in recurrent large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke. Intervent Neurol 2017; 6: 1–7.

5. Webster MW, Chancellor AM, Smith HJ et al. Patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients. Lancet 1988; 2: 11–12.

6. Lechat P, Mas JL, Lascault G et al. Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1148–1152.

7. Maron BA, Shekar PS, Goldhaber SZ. Paradoxical embolism. Circulation 2010; 122(19): 1968–1972. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.961920.

8. Pristipino C, Sievert H, D´Ascenzo F et al. European position paper on the management of patient with patent foramen ovale. General apprach and left circulation thromboembolism. European Heart Journal 2018; 00: 1–14.

9. Chiti A, Pizzanelli C, Terni E et al. A case of recurrent basilar artery occlusion successfully treated with repeated intravascular procedures. Neurologist 2011; 17: 95–97.

10. Laible M, Möhlenbruch M, Hacke W et al. Repeated intra-arterial thrombectomy within 72 hours in a patient with a clear contraindication for intravenous thrombolysis. Case Rep Vasc Med 2015; 2015: 872817. doi: 10.1155/2015/872817.

11. Lee Y, Yi H, Kim BM et al. Recurrent cardioembolic stroke treated successfully with repeated mechanical thrombectomy within the acute index stroke period. J Clin Neurol 2015 11: 275–278.

12. Gory et al. Repeated Solitaire mechanical thrombectomy in an acute anterior stroke patient. Rev Neurol Paris 2015; 171(8–9): 682–684.

13. Quintas S, López RR, Ximénez-Carrillo A et al. Recur-rencia precoz de infarto cardioembólico tratada con éxito mediante una segunda trombectomía. Neurología 2017; 32: 551–554.

14. Fandler S, Deutschmann H, Fazekas F et al. Repeated endovascular treatment of early recurrent proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion: case report and brief review of the literature. Front Neurol 2018; 9: 289. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00289.

15. Jakubíček S, Reif M, Vaníček J et al. Recurrent ischemic stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy during a pregnancy: a case report. Proceeding of the 4th European Stroke Organisation Conference 2018, Gothenburg, Sweden: 16–18.

16. Mako M, Krastev G, Cisár J et al. Opakovaná mechanická trombektómia pri recidíve akútnej ischemickej cievnej mozgovej príhody s oklúziou veľkej intrakraniálnej tepny, Proceedings of 46. Český a Slovenský Cerebrovaskulárny Kongres; 2018 September 18–20; Mikulov, Česká Republika.

17. Fu Q, Guo X, Mo D et al. Young Paradoxical stroke treated successfully with mechanical thrombectomy using solitaire and transcatheter closure of patent foramen oval. Int Heart J 2017; 58(5): 812–815. doi: 10.1536/ihj.16-461.