Dental Status of Children Below Age of Six Treated under General Anaesthesia over the Period of 2002–2004
Authors:
M. Kukletová 1; L. Pantuček 1; Z. Halačková 1; Z. Broukal 2; L. Izakovičová Hollá 1
Authors place of work:
Stomatologická klinika LF MU a FN u sv. Anny, Brno
1; Oddělení orální epidemiologie, Ústav klinické a experimentální stomatologie 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha
2
Published in the journal:
Česká stomatologie / Praktické zubní lékařství, ročník 113, 2013, 6, s. 77-85
Category:
Original Article – Retrospective Observatory Study
Věnováno prof. MUDr. Jiřímu Mazánkovi, CSc., k významnému životnímu jubileu
Summary
Introduction:
A proportion of preschool children with high caries experience (i.e. with early childhood caries, EEC) has been growing over the recent years in the Czech Republic and other countries. These high-risk children are often difficult to treat at standard dental office, especially if they have concomitant medical problems. The aim of the study was to evaluate dental status of preschool children referred to our department for treatment under general anaesthesia.
Materials and Methods:
In 2002–2004, totally 111 children below the age of six were referred for dental treatment under general anaesthesia (GA) to Dental clinic of the St. Ann´s University Hospital Brno. Dental treatment has happened under standard conditions or under neuroleptanalgesia treatment in 53 children, 22 children were referred to Faculty Children Hospital. The remaining 31 children received treatment under general anaesthesia in our clinic, after unsuccessful attempts with other treatment options. Five children did not report to the treatment under GA. Based on their systemic conditions, these uncooperative children were divided into three groups: dental anxiety (DA), serious systemic conditions (SD) and other disabilities (OD). The following dental indicators were recorded: caries experience (dmft/DMFT) and restorative index (ri/RI). In addition, types of dental offices that referred children for treatment under general anaesthesia were recorded. The data were processed using descriptive statistics (Fisher exact test).
Results:
The mean age of all patients was 3.73 years, dmft = 5.55, out of which dt component = 5 = 5.23, mt = 0.19 and ft = 0.13, ri = 2.3%; DMFT = 0.19, out of which DT component = 0.19, MT+FT = 0.0 and RI = 0.0%; no significant differences among boys and girls were found. DA children – dmft = 5.29, dt = 4.9, mt = 0.29, ft = 0.1, ri = 2.38%. SD children – mean age 3.61, dmft = 7.57, dt = 7.29, mt = 0.0, ft = 0.29, ri = 3.17%. OD children – mean age 3.42, dmft =2.0, dt = 2.67, mt+ft = 0.0, ri = 0.0%. Statistically significant differences were only found between DA and SD group in the mean dmft values (p = 0.013) and mean dt values (0.009).
Conclusion:
The results of this study demonstrate that many uncooperative children can be successfully treated in standard dental office. In children treated under general anaesthesia, SD patients showed significantly higher mean dmft and lower ri than those with dental anxiety. In both groups, unfavourable dental indicators imply insufficient oral hygiene, but also poor dental attendance and inadequate follow-up.
Key words:
dental caries – dmft – restorative index – disabled patients – oral health – primary dentition
Zdroje
1. Ajay, P., Bo, S., Giridhar, P., Mehrnous, E., Raminder, S., Siranush, K., Zsinav, M.: In a population of young children, how accurate is screening for dental caries by medical personnel in comparison to that done by dental personnel? Systematic review. University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, IDAPP 2011, s. 1–10.
2. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Definition of early childhood caries (ECC). Pediatr. Dent., roč. 27, 2005, 7 reference manual, s. 13.
3. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Policy on early child-hood caries (ECC): Unique challenges and treatment options. Pediatr. Dent., roč. 33, 2011, č. 1, s. 50–51.
4. American Society of Anesthesiology: ASA Physical status classification: http://www.asahq.org/Home/For-Members/Clinical-Information/ASA-Physical-Status-Classification-System.
5. American Society of Anesthesiology: Guidelines for office-based anesthesia: http://www.asahq.org/For-Members/Standards-Guidelines-and-Statements.aspx.
6. Berkowitz, R. J.: Causes treatment and prevention of early child-hood caries: A microbiologic perspective. J. Can. Dent. Assoc., roč. 69, 2003, č. 5, s. 304–307.
7. Broukal, Z., Krejsa, O., Mrklas, L., Mazánková, V., Pázlerová, V.: Analýza orálního zdraví u vybraných věkových skupin obyvatel České republiky 2000. Praha: VÚS a ÚZIS, 2000.
8. Broukal, Z., Mrklas, L., Krejsa, O., Mazánková, V., Pázlerová, V.: Analýza orálního zdraví vybraných věkových skupin obyvatel České republiky 2003. Praha: VÚS a ÚZIS, 2004.
9. Forsyth, A. R., Seminario, A. L., Scott, A., Berg, J., Ivanova, I., Lee, H.: General anesthesia time for pediatric dental cases. Pediatrae Dent., roč. 34, 2012, č. 5, s. 129–135.
10. Gunay, H., Schultze, A., Bannasch, W.: Anxiolyse und Sedierung in der Pädodontie mit Midazolam. YWR., 1992, č. 6, s. 101.
11. Kilian, J., Fialová, S., Hubková, V.: Vznik zubního kazu a možnosti jeho prevence. In: Prevence ve stomatologii. Praha: Galén, 1999, s. 45–46.
12. Karim, A. S., Musa, N., Fazliah, S. N. M. N.: Utilization of dental general anaesthesia for children. Malays J. Med. Sci., roč. 15, 2008, č. 3, s. 31–39.
13. Klaasen, M. A., Veerkamp, J. S., Hoogstraten, J.: Dental treatment under general anaesthesia: the short-term change in young children´s oral-health-related quality of life. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent., roč. 9, 2008, č. 3, s. 130–137.
14. Koch, G., Poulsen, S.: Pediatric Dentistry: Behaviour management problems. In: A clinical approach. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 2001, s. 53–70.
15. Kukletová, M., Kukleta, M.: Požadavky na stomatologické ošetření vycházející z emocí člověka. Acta Facult. Med. Univ. Brunensis, 1988, 100, s. 105–108.
16. Kukletová, M., Kuklová, J., Kukleta, M.: Oxazepam to stomatologic patients who do not cooperate: Act. nerv.super. (Praha), roč. 31, 1989, č. 1, s. 57–58.
17. Lee, J. Y., Vann, W. F, Roberts, M.W.: A cost analysis of treating pediatric dental patiens using general anesthesia vs consious sedation. Pediatr Dent., roč. 22, 2000, č. 1, s. 27–32.
18. Kupietzky, A., Holan, G., Shapira, J.: Intranasal midazolam better at effecting amnesia after sedation than oral hydroxyzine: A pilot study. Pediatr. Dent., roč. 18, 1996, č. 1, s. 32–34.
19. Lenčová, E., Pikhart, H., Broukal, Z.: Early childhood caries trends and surveillance shortcommings in the Czech Rep. BMC Public Health, 2012, 12:547, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-54.
20. Libigerová, E.: Úzkost, stres a úzkostné poruchy na počátku 21. století. Remedia, roč. 13, 2003, č. 6, s. 442–454.
21. Milnes, A. R., Maupome, G., Cannon, J.: Intravenous sedation in pediatric dentistry using midazolam, nalbuphine and droperidol. Pediatr. Dent., roč. 22, 2000, č. 2, s. 113–119.
22. Milnes, A. R.: Intravenous procedural sedation: An alternative to general anesthesia in the treatment of early childhood caries. J. Can. Dent. Assoc., roč. 69, 2003, č. 5, s. 298–302.
23. Navarová, L., Handzel, J.: Naše dosavadní zkušenosti s ošetřením dětí a mladistvých v sedaci při vědomí N2O/O2. Prakt. zub. Lék., roč. 56, 2008, č. 3, s. 35–37.
24. Nováková, K., Andresová, S.: Vliv dificility na stupeň nespolupráce dětí při stomatologickém ošetření. Čes. Stomat., roč. 90, 1990, č. 6, s. 216–220.
25. Nováková, K., Němečková, P., Kolařík, Z., Richterová, S.: K psychoterapii nespolupracujících dětí. Čes. Stomat., roč. 105, 2005, č. 2, s. 46–52.
26. Nováková, K., Andresová, S.: Výskyt afektivních poruch u problémových pacientů. Čes. Stomat., roč. 92, 1992, č. 1, s. 31–35.
27. Nováková, K., Broukal, Z., Krejčí, P., Matějíčková, E., Pilinová, A., Stárková, L., Ščigel, V.: Psychologický přístup při stomatologickém ošetřování. In: Nováková, K. a kol. Stomatologická péče o hendikepované pacienty. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého – skripta, 2008, s. 66–71.
28. Pezzementi, M. L., Fisher, M. A.: Oral health status of people with intellectual disabilities in the southeastern United States. J. Am. Dent. Ass., roč. 136, 2005, č. 7, s. 903–912.
29. Roberts, G. J. Management of pain and anxiety. In: Welbury, R. D.: Paediatric Dentistry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997, s. 53–74.
30. Ščigel, V., Michálek, P., Hess, L.: Inhalační sedace ve stomatologii v Sedace v praxi zubního lékaře. Praha: Quintessenz, 2007, s. 125–135.
31. Ščigel, V., Michálek, P., Hess, L.: Sedace v dětském věku v Sedace v praxi zubního lékaře. Praha: Quintessenz, 2007 s. 145–159.
32. Vitale, M. C., Casaschi, P., Follo, R.: The use of a new projective psychological test to evaluate the approach of the dentist towards young patients. Italian J. Paed. Dent., roč. 4, 1999, č. 4, s. 181–188.
33. WHO offset publication N° 103. Prevention of oral diseases. Geneve: WHO, 1987, s. 83.
34. Wilson, S., Easton, J., Lamb, K., Orchardson, R., Casamassino, P.: A retrospective study of chloral hydrate, meperidine, hydroxizine, and midazolam regimens used to sedate children for dental care. Pediatr. Dent., roč. 22, 2000, č. 2, s. 107–112.
35. Wilson, S., Matusak, A., Casamassimo, P., Larsen, P.: The effects of nitrous oxide on pediatric dental patients sedated with chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine. Pediatr. Dent., roč. 20, 1998, č. 4, s. 253–258.
Štítky
Maxillofacial surgery Orthodontics Dental medicineČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Czech Dental Journal
2013 Číslo 6
- What Effect Can Be Expected from Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis?
- The Importance of Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Administration to Diabetics with Gingivitis
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Chondrocalcinosis (Pseudogout) of the Temporomandibular Joint
- Fiber Reinforced Composites and their Application in the Contemporary Dentistry
- Central Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma
- Dental Status of Children Below Age of Six Treated under General Anaesthesia over the Period of 2002–2004