Ultrasound staging of stage I-II endometrial cancer, analysis of own file in the years 2012–2016

Česká verzia

Authors: O. Míka; J. Kožnarová; P. Sak
Authors place of work: Gynekologicko-porodnické oddělení nemocnice, České Budějovice, primář MUDr. P. Sák, Ph. D.
Published in the journal: Ceska Gynekol 2017; 82(3): 218-226

Summary

Objective:
The aim of the presented study was to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound staging of early stage endometrial cancer depending on grading, evaluation of ultrasound examination accuracy growing overtime with gained experience of examiners and comparison of subjective versus objective modalities of deep myometrial invasion assessment in the file of patients who were referred in The Oncogyneacologic Center, Department of Gyneacology and Obstetrics in České Budějovice.

Design:
Retrospective study.

Settings:
Department of Gyneacology and Obstetrics, Hospital České Budějovice a.s.

Methods and the file:
In this arcticle we retrospectively evaluate the file of 136 patients with early stage endometrial cancer. The patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic procedures during the years 2012-2016 in our department. All these patients were able to be compared in different aproaches to deep myometrial invasion assessment using ultrasound examination.

Results:
Comparing the used methods of deep myometrial invasion assessment with ultrasound examination of early stage endometrial cancer patients the examiner's subjective evaluation seems to be the best approach. After the first year of doing these assessments sensitivity performed 80%, specificity 79% and infiltration of cervix sensitivity 70% and specificity 99%. In case the patients were divided into groups according to the grading, low grade assessed worst sensitivity 64% (high grade l00%), but the best specificity 75% (high grade 56%). The evaluation of objective approaches of ultrasound assement with used cut offs performed the best sensitivity 81% tumour free minimal margin (specificity 67%). On the contrary the best specificity 90% performed the ratio AP (anteroposterior) diameter tumour/AP diameter uterine (senzitivity 54%).

Conclusion:
Generally in oncological therapy the most important things to put stress on the very accurate staging of oncological disease. In oncogyneacology ultrasound becomes more and more required examination. In our file we proved the significance of ultrasound examination in diagnostics and staging of endometrial cancer and we also proved that the accuracy level in early stage depends on the examiner´s experience. After one year practice our results reach the level of the results presented globally, no matter which of the methods – ultrasound MRI or frozen section – was used.

Keywords:
endometrial cancer, early stages, ultrasound examination, staging

Zdroje

1. Akbayir, O., Corbacioglu, A., Numanoglu, C., et al. Preoperative assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma by transvaginal ultrasound. Gynecol Oncol, 2011, 122, p. 600–603.

2. Alcazar, JL., Galvan, R., Albela, S., et al. Assessing myometrial infiltration by endometrial cancer: uterine virtual navigation with threedimensional US. Radiology, 2009, 250, p. 776–783.

3. Alcazar, JL., Dominguez-Piriz, J., MD, Juez, L., et al. Intraoperative gross examination and intraoperative frozen section in patients with endometrial cancer for detecting deep myometrial invasion; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2016, 26, p. 407–415.

4. Antonsen, SL., Jensen, LN., Loft, A., et al. MRI, PET/CT and ultrasound in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer. A multicenter prospective comparative study. Gynecol Oncol, 2013, 128, p. 300–308.

5. Burke, WM., Orr, J., Leitao, L., et al. Endometrial cancer: A review and current management strategies: Part I. 2014, 134, p. 385–392.

6. Celik, C., Ozdemir, S., Esen, H., et al. The clinical value of preoperative and intraoperative assessments in the management of endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2010, 20, p. 358–362.

7. Colombo, N., Creutzberg, C., Amant, F. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2016, 26, p. 2–30.

8. Cibula, D. Chirurgická léčba zhoubného nádoru děložního těla. In Cibula, D. a Petruželka, L. Onkogynekologie. Praha: Grada Publishing, 2009, s. 474–480.

9. DiSaia, PJ., Creasman, WT. Clinical gynaecologic oncology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, 2007, p. 812.

10. De Smet, F., De Brabanter, J., Van den Bosch, T., et al. New models to predict depth of infiltration in endometrial carcinoma based on transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27, 6, p. 664–671.

11. Dušek, L., Mužík, J., Malúšková, D., et. al. Incidence a mortalita nádorových onemocnění v České republice. Klin Onkol, 2014, 27, s. 406–423.

12. Dušek, L., Pavlík, T., Májek, O. j., et al. Odhady incidence, prevalence a počtu onkologických pacientů léčených protinádorovou terapií v letech 2015 a 2020 – analýza Národního onkologického registru ČR. Klin Onkol, 2015, 28, s. 30–43.

13. Epstein, E., Van Holsbeke, C., Mascillini, F., et al. Gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer in relation to stage, grade and tumor size. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 38, p. 586–593.

14. Epstein, E., Blomqvist, L. Imaging in endometrial cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2014, 28, p. 721–739.

15. Fischerová, D., Burgetová, A., Seidl, Z., Bělohlávek, O. Diagnostika nádorů děložního těla. In Cibula, D. a Petruželka, L. Onkogynekologie. Praha: Grada Publishing, 2009, s. 470–474.

16. Fischerová, D. Patologie děložního těla v ultrazvukovém obraze. In Calda, P. Ultrazvuková diagnostika v těhotenství a gynekologii. Praha: Aprofema, 2010, s. 443–453.

17. Fischerová, D. Zhoubný nádor děložního těla – předoperační odlišení nádorů s nízkým a vysokým rizikem metastázování (přehled výsledků nejnovějších ultrazvukových studií). Čes Gynek, 2014, 79, 6, s. 456–465.

18. Fischerova, D., Fruhauf, F., Zikan, M., et al. Factors affecting sonographic preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 43, 5, p. 575–585.

19. Frühauf, F., Dvořák, M., Haaková, L., et al. Ultrazvukový staging karcinomu endometria – doporučená metodika vyšetření. Čes. Gynek, 2014, 79, 6 s. 466–476.

20. Goudge, C., Bernhard, S., Cloven, NG., Morris, P. The impact of complete surgical staging on adjuvant treatment decisions in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2004, 93, 2, p. 536–539.

21. Haldorsen, IS., Berg, A., Werner, HM., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging performs better than endocervical curettage for preoperative prediction of cervical stromal invasion in endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol, 2012, 126, p. 413–418.

22. Chandavarkar, U., Kuperman, JM., Muderspach, LI., et al. Endometrial echo complex thickness in postmenopausal endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2013, 131, p. 109–112.

23. Karlsson, B., Norstrom, A., Granberg, S., Wikland, M. The use of endovaginal ultrasound to diagnose invasion of endometrial carcinoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1992, 2, p. 35–39.

24. Kumar, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., Semaan, A., et al. The role of frozen section in surgical staging of low risk endometrial cancer. PLoSOne. 2011;6:e21912.

25. Leone, FPG., Timmerman, D., Bourne, T., et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: a consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 35, p. 103–112.

26. Mariani, A., Dowdy, SA., Cliby, WA., et al. Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: A paradigm shift in surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol, 2008, 109, p. 11–18.

27. Mariani, A., Dowdy, SA., Keeney, GL. High-risk endometrial cancer subgroups: candidates for target-based adjuvant therapy, Gynecol Oncol, 2003, 95, p. 120–126.

28. Mascillini, F., Testa, AC., Van Holsbeke, C., et al. Assessing endometrial and cervical invasion in women with endometrial cancer – comparing subjective evaluation to objective measurement techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 42, p. 353–358.

29. Ortoft, G., Dueholm, M., Mathiesen, O., et al. Preoperative staging of endometrial cancer using TVS, MRI, and hysteroscopy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2013, 92, 5, p. 536–545.

30. Özdemir, S., Cetin, C., Emlik, D., et al. Assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer by transvaginal sonography, doppler ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2009, 19, p. 1085–1090.

31. Pecorelli, S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 105, p. 103–104.

32. Quinlivan, JA., Petersen, RW., Nicklin, JL. Accuracy of frozen section for the operative management of endometrial cancer, BJOG, 2001, 108, p. 798–803.

33. Sanjuán, A., Cobo, T., Pahisa, J., et al. Preoperative and intraoperative assessment of myometrial invasion and histologic grade in endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2006, 16, p. 385–390.

34. Savelli, L., Ceccarini, M., Ludovisi, M., et al. Preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer: transvaginal sonography vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 31, p. 560–566.

35. Savelli, L., Testa, AC., Mabrouk, M., et al. A prospective blinded comparison of the accuracy of transvaginal sonography and frozen section in the assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2012, 124, p. 549–552.

36. Smith-Bindman, R., Weiss, E., Feldstein, V. How thick is too thick? When endometrial thickness should prompt biopsy in postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 24, p. 558–565.

37. Takano, M., Ochi, H., Takei,Y., et al. Surgery for endometrial cancers with suspected cervical involvement: is radical hysterectomy needed (a GOTIC study)? Br J Cancer, 2013, 109, p. 1760–1765.

38. Tanaka, T., Terai, Y., Ono, YJ., et al. Preoperative MRI and intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2015, 25 p. 879–883.

39. Timmerman, A., Opmeer, BC., Khan, KS., et al. Endometrial thickness measurement for detecting endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 11, p. 160–167.

40. Uccella, S. Endometrial cancer: Epidemiology and treatment. In Ayhan, A., Reed, N., Gultekin, M. et al. Textbook of gynaecological onocology. Ankara: Gunes Publishing, 2016, p. 529–528.

41. Van Holsbeke, C., Ameye, L., Testa, AC., et al. Development and external validation of (new) ultrasound based mathematical models for preoperative prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 43, p. 586–595.

42. http://gco.iarc.fr/today/online-analysis-map

43. Guideline gynekologických zhoubných nádorů: Standard – Komplexní léčba zhoubných nádorů endometria, http://www.onkogynekologie.com//Guideline_C54_2013.pdf