#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Practical experience confirms the results of the RCT and RWE studies with empagliflosin: case reports


Authors: Emil Martinka 1,2;  Daniela Kollárová 3;  Monika Urbanová 4
Authors place of work: Národný endokrinologický a diabetologický ústav, n. o., Ľubochňa 1;  Fakulta zdravotníckych vied Piešťany, Univerzita Sv. Cyrila a Metoda, Trnava 2;  DK ORTOPÉDIA s. r. o., Nové Zámky 3;  TabletkaDia, s. r. o., Nitra 4
Published in the journal: Forum Diab 2021; 10(1): 53-61

Summary

SGLT2 Cotransporter (SGLT2i) Inhibitors is a relatively new group of pharmaceuticals that have been developed as oral antidiabetics to control elevated blood glucose levels. A unique feature of SGLT2i is that they achieve a decrease in glycemia independently of insulin secretion and tissue sensitivity to insulin, by blocking the reabsorption of glucose from primary urine in the proximal renal tubule and its subsequent excretion into the urine. Initial concerns about side effects - in particular the risk of genitourinary infections, dehydration or loss of electrolytes and minerals - have finally not been proven as limiting the use of these drugs. Quite the reverse, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the cardiovascular safety of individual SGLT2i molecules have demonstrated not only safety but even cardiovascular benefit. We present two case reports from diabetological outpatient clinics concerning patients whose treatment was intensified by the addition of SGLT2i empagliflozin. Experience of both the case reports indicates consistency with the published results of the large RCT and RWE studies, stating that the addition of empagliflozin to treatment contributes not only to the significant control of glycemias and body weight, but also to a significant reduction of morbidity-mortality, cardiovascular and renal risk.

Keywords:

antidiabetic drugs – empagliflozin – inhibitors SGLT2 – glucose concentrations


Zdroje
  1. [American Diabetes Association]. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2021. Diabetes Care 2021; 44(Supplement 1): S111–S124. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S009>.
  2. [American Diabetes Association]. 10. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2021. Diabetes Care 2021; 44(Supplement 1): S125–S150. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S010>.
  3. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74(10): e177–e232. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.010>.
  4. Butler J, Packer M, Anker SD et al. Empagliflozin for the treatment of chronic heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction in patients with and without diabetes: new results of the EMPEROR-Reduced trial. EASD 2020. Dostupné z WWW: <https://www.easd.org/virtualmeeting/home.html>.
  5. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J 2020; 41(2): 255–323. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486>.
  6. Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Diabetologia 2018; 61(12): 2461–2498. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125–018–4729–5>.
  7. Einarson TR, Acs A, Ludwig C, Panton UH. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientifc evidence from across the world in 2007–2017. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2018; 17(1): 83. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933–018–0728–6>.
  8. Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR et al. [Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration]. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet 2010; 375(9733): 2215–2222. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140–6736(10)60484–9>.
  9. Ferrannini E, Mark M, Mayoux E. CV Protection in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial: A „Thrifty Substrate“ Hypothesis. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39(7): 1108–1114. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc16–0330>.
  10. Green JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW et al. Effect of Sitagliptin on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(3): 232–242. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1501352>.
  11. Heerspink HJ, Stefansson BV, Correa-Rotter R et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2020; 383(15): 1436–1446. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2024816>.
  12. Inzucchi SE, Zinman B, Wanner C et al. Empagliflozin Reduces the Total Burden of All-cause Hospitalizations. American Diabetes Association (ADA) 80th Scientific Sessions 2020, June 12–16. Virtual Meeting. 131-LB. Dostupné z DOI: <https://www.easd.org/virtualmeeting/home.html#!resources>.
  13. Martinka E, Tkáč I, Mokáň M (eds). Interdisciplinárne štandardy diagnostiky a liečby diabetes mellitus, jeho komplikácií a najvýznamnejších sprievodných ochorení. Forum Diab 2018; 7(2 Suppl 1): 5–153.
  14. Martinka E. Implementujeme aktuálne odporúčania ADA/EASD do liečby pacientov s diabetes mellitus 2. typu dostatočne? Forum Diab 2019; 8(2): 63–70.
  15. McGuire DK, Zinman B, Inzucchi SE et al. Effects of empagliflozin on first and recurrent clinical events in patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a secondary analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020; 8(12): 949–959. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213–8587(20)30344–2>.
  16. McMurray JJ, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE et al. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med 2019; 381(21): 1995–2008. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911303>.
  17. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J et al. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2020; 383(15):1413–1424. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2022190>.
  18. Patorno E, Pawar A, Bessette LG et al. 133-LB – Cardiovascular outcomes in older adults initiating Empagliflozin vs. DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists: a subgroup analysis from the EMPRISE study. Dostupné z WWW: <https://plan.core-apps.com/tristar_ada20/abstract/ff32b460–6aeb-47be-87a4–99cd64ce1381>.
  19. Patorno E, Pawar A, Lily G et al. Effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin in routine care patients: interim results from the EMPagliflozin compaRative effectIveness and SafEty (EMPRISE) study. Poster. American Diabetes Association (ADA) 80th Scientific Sessions 2020, June 12–16. Virtual Meeting. 134-LB. Dostupné z DOI: <https://doi.org/10.2337/db20–134-LB>.
  20. Pawar A, Patorno E, Deruaz-Luyet A et al. Health-care costs and medication burden in routine care initiators of empagliflozin: a first analysis from the Empagliflozin Comparative Effectiveness and Safety (EMPRISE) study. Diabetes. 2019; 68(Supplement 1):1193-P. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db19–1193-P>.
  21. Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2019; 380(24): 2295–2306. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1811744.
  22. Perkovic V, de Zeeuw D, Mahaffey KW et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: results from the CANVAS Program randomised clinical trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6(9): 691–704. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213–8587(18)30141–4>.
  23. Rosenstock J, Kahn SE, Johansen OE et al. [CAROLINA Investigators]. Effect of Linagliptin vs Glimepiride on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The CAROLINA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019;322(12): 1155–1166. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.13772>. Erratum in: JAMA 2019; 322(21): 2138.
  24. Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E et al. Saxagliptin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. N Engl J Med 2013; 369(14): 1317–1326. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1307684>.
  25. Schernthaner G, Drexel H, Moshkovich E et al. SGLT2 inhibitors in T2D and associated comorbidities—differentiating within the class. BMC Endocr Disord 2019; 19(1): 64. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902–019–0387-y>.
  26. Schernthaner G, Shehadeh, N, Ametov AS et al. Worldwide inertia to the use of cardiorenal protective glucose-lowering drugs (SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA) in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2020; 19(1): 185. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933–020–01154-w>.
  27. Schernthaner, G, Lehmann, R, Prázný et al. Translating recent results from the Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials into clinical practice: recommendations from the Central and Eastern European Diabetes Expert Group (CEEDEG). Cardiovasc Diabetol 2017; 16(1): 137. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933–017–0622–7>.
  28. Schramm TK, Gislason GH, Vaag A et al. Mortality and cardiovascular risk associated with different insulin secretagogues compared with metformin in type 2 diabetes, with or without a previous myocardial infarction: a nationwide study. Eur Heart J 2011; 32(15): 1900–1908. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr077>.
  29. Vaduganatham M et al. Empagliflozin delays need for insulin initiation in patients with and lowers insulin requirements in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Finding from EMPA-REG OUTCOME. American Diabetes Association (ADA) 80th Scientific Sessions 2020, June 12–16. Virtual Meeting. 30_OR. Dostupné z DOI: Dostupné z DOI: <http://DOI:10.2337/db20–30-OR>.
  30. Verma S, Leiter LA, Sharma A et al. How early after treatment initiation are the CV benefits of empagliflozin apparent? A post hoc analysis of EMOPA-REG OUTCOME. American Diabetes Association (ADA) 80th Scientific Sessions 2020, June 12–16. Virtual Meeting. 28-OR. Dostupné z DOI: <https://doi.org/10.2337/db20–28-OR>.
  31. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM et al. Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(4): 323–334. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1515920>.
  32. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 380(4): 347–357. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1812389>.
  33. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(22): 2117–2128. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504720>.
  34. Zhang X-L, Zhu Q-Q, Chen Y-H et al. Cardiovascular safety, long-term noncardiovascular safety, and efficacy of sodiumglucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systemic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7(2): e007165. Dostupné z DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007165>.
Štítky
Diabetology Endocrinology Internal medicine
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#