Oesophageal cancer and risk factors by histological type
Authors:
S. Magnusková 1; K. Azeem 1; V. Kamarád 2; H. Tomášková 3; V. Janout 1,3; H. Kollárová 1
Authors place of work:
Ústav preventivního lékařství, LF UP v Olomouci
1; Ústav histologie a embryologie, LF OU, Ostrava
2; Ústav epidemiologie a veřejného zdraví, LF OU, Ostrava
3
Published in the journal:
Gastroent Hepatol 2012; 66(5): 364-371
Category:
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology: Original Article
Summary
Design:
Oesophageal cancer is a disease with multifactorial aetiology and possible differences with regard to histological type. The aim of this paper is to assess the relationship between individual selected risk factors and determine the degree of association in oesophageal cancer development while taking histological types into account.
Methods:
Within the framework of the multicenter study led by the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) for Middle and Eastern European countries, carried out from March 2000 to November 2002 for the purpose of elucidating the relationship between lifestyle, the environment and working environment, its risks and health disorders, the influence of selected risk factors in 88 oesophageal cancer patients (76 males and 12 females) and 200 controls (123 males and 77 females) was monitored as well. The participants were interviewed by a trained interviewer using a standardized questionnaire.
Results:
The assessment was carried out using OR (odds ratio) and adjusted OR for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, profession, pyrosis and regurgitation. In the study group, males diagnosed with oesophageal cancer regardless of histological type were younger than females and this difference was statistically significant. When evaluating overweight and obesity using OR, a statistically significant inverse association (OR = 0.38; OR = 0.22, respectively) was ascertained. In current smokers, there was a significant positive association (OR = 5.84). After adjustment for the studied factors, a relatively strong statistically significant positive association was found only in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OR = 26.89). A dose-response relationship was revealed for the frequency of cumulative consumption of alcohol and the risk of oesophageal carcinoma development where the OR rose depending on the dose, from 4.93 in a group consuming doses of under 100 g of pure alcohol weekly to 14.10 in a group consuming 300 or more grams of pure alcohol weekly. The results of ORs for each profession showed a higher risk for professions exposed to combustion fumes, asbestos, silica, concrete dust and black carbon, with OR of 2.31, and the result was statistically significant also for technical professions where a relatively strong positive association was found (OR = 2.51). The adjusted OR for pyrosis and regurgitation was twice as high in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OR = 25.98) compared to oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OR = 12.44).
Conclusion:
The presented study is exceptional due to its analysis of risk factors in relation to different histological types of oesophageal cancer and is quite unique for the Czech Republic. So far in the Czech Republic, the evaluation of selected risk factors to such an extent has not been performed yet. Therefore, the results are compared with the foreign literature. The uniqueness of the presented study lies in the fact that the results are related to individual histological subtypes, which are not even sufficiently described in foreign literature.
Key words:
cancer – esophageal neoplasms – risk factors
The author declares he has no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.
The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE „uniform requirements“ for biomedical papers.
Submitted:
21. 2. 2012
Accepted:
1. 5. 2012
Zdroje
1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010; 127(12): 2893–2917.
2. Coleman MP, Gatta G, Verdecchia A et al. EUROCARE-3 summary: cancer survival in Europe at the end of the 20th century. Ann Oncol 2003; 14 (Suppl 5): 128–149.
3. Lambert R, Hainaut P. Epidemiology of oesophagogastric cancer. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 21(6): 921–945.
4. Dušek L et al. Epidemiology of malignant tumours of the oesophagus (C15). In: Czech cancer care in numbers 2008–2009. Praha: Grada 2010.
5. Dušek L et al. Český národní webový portál epidemiologie nádorů (online). Masarykova Univerzita 2005. http://www.svod.cz.
6. Corley DA, Kubo A, Zhao W. Abdominal obesity and the risk of esophageal and gastric cardia carcinomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17(2): 352–358.
7. Smith M, Zhou M, Whitlock G et al. Esophageal cancer and body mass index: results from a prospective study of 220,000 men in China and a meta-analysis of published studies. Int J Cancer 2008; 122(7): 1604–1610.
8. Kubo A, Corley DA. Body mass index and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or gastric cardia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15(5): 872–878.
9. Engel LS, Chow WH, Vaughan TL et al. Population attributable risks of esophageal and gastric cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 1404−1413.
10. Lagergren J. Controversies surrounding body mass, reflux, and risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7(4): 347–349.
11. Rubenstein JH, Taylor JB. Meta-analysis: the association of oesophageal adenocarcinoma with symptoms of gastro--oesophageal reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32(10): 1222–1227.
12. Freedman ND, Abnet CC, Leitzmann MF et al. A prospective study of tobacco, alcohol, and the risk of oesophageal and gastric cancer subtypes. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165(12): 1424–1433.
13. Wu AH, Wan P, Bernstein L. A multiethnic population-based study of smoking, alcohol and body size and risk of adenocarcinomas of the stomach and esophagus (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2001; 12(8): 721–732.
14. Lee CH, Lee JM, Wu DC et al. Independent and combined effects of alcohol intake, tobacco smoking and betel quid chewing on the risk of esophageal cancer in Taiwan. Int J Cancer 2005; 113(3): 475–482.
15. Kollarova H, Machova L, Horakova D et al. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer an overview article. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2007; 151(1): 17–20.
16. Freedman ND, Abnet CC, Leitzmann MF et al. A prospective study of tobacco, alcohol, and the risk of oesophageal and gastric cancer subtypes. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165(12): 1424–1433.
17. Hashibe M, Boffetta P, Janout V et al. Esophageal cancer in Central and Eastern Europe: tobacco and alcohol. Int J Cancer 2007; 120(7): 1518–1522.
18. de Jonge PJ, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ et al. Risk factors for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101(7): 1421–1429.
19. Lagergren J, Bergström R, Lindgren A et al. The role of tobacco, snuff and alcohol use in the aetiology of cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Int J Cancer 2000; 85(3): 340–346.
20. Lagergren J. Adenocarcinoma of oesophagus: what exactly is the size of the problem and who is at risk? Gut 2005; 54 (Suppl 1): i1–5.
21. Vaughan TL, Davis S, Kristal A et al. Obesity, alcohol, and tobacco as risk factors for cancers of the esophagus and gastric cardia: adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1995; 4(2): 85–92.
22. Kabat GC, Ng SK, Wynder EL. Tobacco, alcohol intake, and diet in relation to adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Cancer Causes Control 1993; 4(2): 123–132.
23. Kollarova H, Machova L, Horakova D et al. Risk of oesophageal cancer. Ces a Slov Gastroent a Hepatol 2008; 62(2): 79–83.
24. Vioque J, Barber X, Bolumar F et al. Esophageal cancer risk by type of alcohol drinking and smoking: a case-control study in Spain. BMC Cancer 2008; 8: 221.
25. Zhao Y, Krishnadasan A, Kennedy N et al. Estimated effects of solvents and mineral oils on cancer incidence and mortality in a cohort of aerospace workers. Am J Ind Med 2005; 48(4): 249–258.
26. Sullivan PA, Eisen EA, Woskie SR et al. Mortality studies of metalworking fluid exposure in the automobile industry: VI. A case-control study of esophageal cancer. Am J Ind Med 1998; 34(1): 36–48.
27. Santibañez M, Vioque J, Alguacil J et al. Occupational exposures and risk of oesophageal cancer by histological type: a case--control study in eastern Spain. Occup Environ Med 2008; 65(11): 774–781.
28. Haguenoer JM, Cordier S, Morel C et al. Occupational risk factors for upper respiratory tract and upper digestive tract cancers. Br J Ind Med 1990; 47(6): 380–383.
29. Brophy JT, Keith MM, Gorey KM et al. Cancer and construction: what occupational histories in a Canadian community reveal. Int J Occup Environ Health 2007; 13(1): 32–38.
30. Verma DK, Kurtz LA, Sahai D et al. Current chemical exposures among Ontario construction workers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2003; 18(12): 1031–1047.
31. Kirkeleit J, Riise T, Bjørge T et al. Increased risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma among upstream petroleum workers. Occup Environ Med 2010; 67(5): 335–340.
32. Lagorio S, Forastiere F, Iavarone I et al. Mortality of filling station attendants. Scand J Work Environ Health 1994; 20(5): 331–338.
33. Engel LS, Vaughan TL, Gammon MD et al. Occupation and risk of esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Am J Ind Med 2002; 42(1): 11–22.
34. Meyer A, Alexandre PC, Chrisman Jde R et al. Esophageal cancer among Brazilian agricultural workers: case-control study based on death certificates. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2011; 214(2): 151–155.
35. Ward MH, Dosemeci M, Cocco P. Mortality from gastric cardia and lower esophagus cancer and occupation. J Occup Med 1994; 36(11): 1222–1227.
36. Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A et al. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999; 340(11): 825–831.
37. Chak A, Faulx A, Eng C et al. Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or cardia. Cancer 2006; 107(9): 2160–2166.
Štítky
Paediatric gastroenterology Gastroenterology and hepatology SurgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
2012 Číslo 5
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Possibilities of Using Metamizole in the Treatment of Acute Primary Headaches
- Current Insights into the Antispasmodic and Analgesic Effects of Metamizole on the Gastrointestinal Tract
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Budenofalk 2 mg rectal foam represents a major new option in the treatment of patients with ulcerous colitis
- Epidemiology of malignant tumours of the gastrointestinal tract in the Czech Republic – state of the art and prediction
- Pancreatic cancer
- Prof. MUDr. Aleš Hep, CSc., turned 60