An invasive therapy of chronic pancreatitis is indicated if pain, suspicion on malignancy, biliary tract obstruction, leak and cystoid appeared

Česká verzia

Authors: J. Špičák ¹; V. Kojecký ²
Authors place of work: Klinika hepatogastroenterologie, IKEM, Praha ¹; Interní klinika IPVZ Zlín, Krajská nemocnice T. Bati, a. s., Zlín ²
Published in the journal: Gastroent Hepatol 2013; 67(2): 151-153
Category:

Zdroje

1. Rösch T, Daniel S, Scholz M et al. Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis: a multicenter study of 1000 patients with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy 2002; 34(10): 765–771.

2. Dumonceau J-M, Deviére J, Le Moine O et al. Endoscopic pancreatic drainmage inm chronic pancreatitis associated with ductal stones: long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43(6): 547–555.

3. Weber A, Schneider J, Neu B et al. Endoscopic stent therapy for patients with chronic pancreatitis: results from a prospective follow-up study. Pancreas 2007; 34(3): 287–294.

4. Inui K, Tazuma S, Yamaguchi T et al. Treatment of pancreatic stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: results of a multicenter survey. Pancreas 2005; 30(1): 26–30.

5. Tandan M, Reddy DN, Santosh D et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endotherapy for pancreatic calculi – a large single center experience. Indian J Gastroenterol 2010; 29(4): 143–148.

6. Dumonceau J-M, Costamagna G, Tringali A et al. Treatment for painful calcified chronic pancreatitis: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic treatment: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2007; 56(4): 545–552.

7. Díte P, Ruzicka M, Zboril V et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing endoscopic and surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2003; 35(7): 553–558.

8. Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Laramée P et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic vs surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2011; 141(5): 1690–1695.

9. Rosso E, Alekis N, Ghaneh P et al. Pancreatic pseudocyst in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic and surgical treatment. Dig Surg, 2003; 20(5): 397–406.

10. Kahaleh M, Shami VM, Canaway MR et al. Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage. Endoscopy 2006; 38(4): 355–359.

11. Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Rao C et al. Non-fluoroscopic endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of symptomatic non-bulging walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Dig Endosc 2013; 25(1): 47–52.

12. Mangiavillano B, Arcidiacono PG, Masci E et al. Single step versus two- step endo-ultrasonography-guided drainage of pancetic pseudocyst. J Dig Dis 2012; 13(1): 47–53.

13. Khashab MA, Lennon AM, Singh VK et al. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pseudocyst drainage as a one-step procedure using a novel multiple-wire insertion technique (with video). Surg Endosc 2012; 26(1): 3320–3323.

14. Catalano MF, Linder JD, George S et al. Treatment of symptomatic distal common bile duct stenosis secondary to chronic pancreatitis: comparison of single vs. multiple simultaneous stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60(6): 945–952.

15. Lawrence C, Romagnuolo J, Payne KM et al. Low symptomatic premature stent occlusion of multiple plastic stents for benign biliary strictures: comparing standard and prolonged stent change intervals. Gastrontest Endosc 2010; 72(3): 558–638.

16. Poley JW, Cahen DL, Metselaar HJ et al. A prospective group sequential study evaluating a new type of fully covered self-expandable metal stent for the treatment of benign biliary strictures (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75(4): 783–789.