Cholangiopancreatoscopy – Czech Society of Gastroenterology Guidelines
Authors:
P. Vítek 1,2; O. Urban 2–4; T. Hucl 5; V. Nosek 6
; M. Loveček 7; Přemysl Falt 2,4,8
; M. Zavoral 9; J. Špičák 5; S. Rejchrt 4
Authors place of work:
Beskydské Gastrocentrum, Interní oddělení, Nemocnice ve Frýdku-Místku, p. o.
1; Katedra interních oborů, LF OU v Ostravě
2; II. interní klinika LF UP a FN Olomouc
3; II. interní klinika 1. LF UK a FN Hradec Králové
4; Klinika hepatogastroenterologie, Transplantcentrum, IKEM, Praha
5; Oddělení gastroenterologie, Nemocnice Jablonec nad Nisou, p. o.
6; I. chirurgická klinika LF UP a FN Olomouc
7; Centrum péče o zažívací trakt, Vítkovická nemocnice a. s., Ostrava 9 Interní klinika 1. LF UK a ÚVN – VFN Praha
8
Published in the journal:
Gastroent Hepatol 2018; 72(3): 199-204
Category:
doi:
https://doi.org/10.14735/amgh2018199
Summary
The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.
The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE „uniform requirements“ for biomedical papers.
Zdroje
1. ASGE Technology Committee, Komanduri S, Thosani N et al. Cholangiopancreatoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84 (2): 209–221. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.013.
2. Špičák J, Urban O et al. Novinky v digestivní endoskopii. Praha: Grada Publishing 2015.
3. Moon JH, Terheggen G, Choi HJ et al. Peroral cholangioscopy: diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Gastroenterology 2013; 144 (2): 276–282. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.045.
4. Moon JH, Ko BM, Choi HJ et al. Intraductal balloon-guided direct peroral cholangioscopy with an ultraslim upper endoscope (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70 (2): 297–302. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.019.
5. Itoi T, Osanai M, Igarashi Y et al. Diagnostic peroral video cholangioscopy is an accurate diagnostic tool for patients with bile duct lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8 (11): 934–938. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.06.029.
6. Kurihara T, Yasuda I, Isayama H et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy in biliopancreatic diseases: prospective multicenter study in Japan. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22 (5): 1891–1901. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1891.
7. Sethi A, Widmer J, Shah NL et al. Interobserver agreement for evaluation of imaging with single operator choledochoscopy: what are we looking at? Dig Liver Dis 2014; 46 (6): 518–522. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.02.004.
8. Korrapati P, Ciolino J, Wani S et al. The efficacy of peroral cholangioscopy for difficult bile duct stones and indeterminate strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4 (3): E263–E275. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100194.
9. Shah RJ, Raijman I, Brauer B et al. Performance of a fully disposable, digital, single-operator cholangiopancreatoscope. Endoscopy 2017; 49 (7): 651–658. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-106295.
10. Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Kommaraju K et al. Digital, single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pancreatobiliary disorders: a multicenter clinical experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84 (4): 649–655. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.789.
11. Aabakken L, Karlsen TH, Albert J et al. Role of endoscopy in primary sclerosing cholangitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49 (6): 588–608. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-107029.
12. Tischendorf JJ, Kruger M, Trautwein C et al. Cholangioscopic characterization of dominant bile duct stenoses in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 2006; 38 (7): 665–669.
13. Arnelo U, von Seth E, Bergquist A. Prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 2015; 47 (8): 696–702. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391845.
14. Tringali A, Lemmers A, Meves V et al. Intraductal biliopancreatic imaging: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) technology review. Endoscopy 2015; 47 (8): 739–753. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392584.
15. Chen YK, Pleskow DK. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65 (6): 832–841.
16. Urban O, Fojtík P, Mikolajek O et al. Renesance cholangiopankreatoskopie a nové možnosti intraduktální endoskopické terapie. Gastroent Hepatol 2016; 70 (3): 203–207. doi: 10.14735/amgh2016203.
17. Roque J, Ho SH, Reddy N et al. Endoscopic ablation therapy for biliopancreatic malignancies. Clin Endosc 2015; 48 (1): 15–19. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.15.
18. Barkay O, Bucksot L, Sherman S. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage with the SpyGlass cholangiopancreatoscopy system. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70 (5): 1039–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.033.
19. Del Chiaro M, Verbeke C, Salvia R et al. European experts consensus statement on cystic tumours of the pancreas. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45 (9): 703–711. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.01. 010.
20. Arnelo U, Siiki A, Swahn F et al. Single-operator pancreatoscopy is helpful in the evaluation of suspected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). Pancreatology 2014; 14 (6): 510–514. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.08.007.
21. Hara T, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T et al. Diagnosis and patient management of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the pancreas by using peroral pancreatoscopy and intraductal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 2002; 122 (1): 34–43.
22. Nagayoshi Y, Aso T, Ohtsuka T et al. Peroral pancreatoscopy using the SpyGlass system for the assessment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014; 21 (6): 410–417. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.44.
23. Kaneko T, Nakao A, Nomoto S et al. Intraoperative pancreatoscopy with the ultrathin pancreatoscope for mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas. Arch Surg 1998; 133 (3): 263–267.
24. Pucci MJ, Johnson CM, Punja VP et al. Intraoperative pancreatoscopy: a valuable tool for pancreatic surgeons? J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18 (6): 1100–1107. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-25 01-9.
25. El Hajj II, Brauer BC, Wani S et al. Role of per-oral pancreatoscopy in the evaluation of suspected pancreatic duct neoplasia: a 13-year U.S. single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85 (4): 737–745. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.040.
26. Meining A, Phillip V, Gaa J et al. Pancreaticoscopy with miniprobe-based confocal laser-scanning microscopy of an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69 (6): 1178–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.013.
27. Yamaguchi T, Shirai Y, Ishihara T et al. Pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: significance of sampling by peroral pancreatoscopy. Cancer 2005; 104 (12): 2830–2836.
28. Attwell AR, Brauer BC, Chen YK et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with per oral pancreatoscopy for calcific chronic pancreatitis using endoscope and catheter-based pancreatoscopes: a 10-year single-center experience. Pancreas 2014; 43 (2): 268–274. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182965 d81.
29. Maydeo A, Kwek A, Bhandari S et al. SpyGlass pancreatoscopy-guided cannulation and retrieval of a deeply migrated pancreatic duct stent. Endoscopy 2011; 43 (Suppl 2): E137–E138. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256205.
30. Bhandari S, Sharma A, Bathini R et al. Endoscopic management of internally migrated pancreatic duct stents (with video). Indian J Gastroenterol 2016; 35 (2): 91–100. doi: 10.1007/s12664-016-0638-z.
31. Gornals JB, Consiglieri C, Redondo S. SpyGlass DS-guided conversion of transmural pancreaticogastrostomy drainage to transpapillary drainage by rendezvous via a lumen-apposing metal stent. Endoscopy 2017; 49 (S 01): E97–E98. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-100216.
32. Lübbe J, Arnelo U, Lundell L et al. ERCP-guided cholangioscopy using a single-use system: nationwide register-based study of its use in clinical practice. Endoscopy 2015; 47 (9): 802–807. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391990.
33. Sethi A, Chen YK, Austin GL et al. ERCP with cholangiopancreatoscopy may be associated with higher rates of complications than ERCP alone: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73 (2): 251–256. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.058.
34. Thosani N, Zubarik RS, Kochar R et al. Prospective evaluation of bacteremia rates and infectious complications among patients undergoing single-operator choledochoscopy during ERCP. Endoscopy 2016; 48 (5): 424–431. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-101407.
35. Adler DG, Cox K, Milliken M et al. A large multicenter study analysis of adverse events associated with single operator cholangiopancreatoscopy. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2015; 61 (4): 179–184.
36. Dumonceau JM, Andriulli A, Elmunzer BJ et al. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – updated June 2014. Endoscopy 2014; 46 (9): 799–815. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377875.
37. Efthymiou M, Raftopoulos S, Antonio Chirinos J et al. Air embolism complicated by left hemiparesis after direct cholangioscopy with an intraductal balloon anchoring system. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75 (1): 221–223. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.038.
Štítky
Paediatric gastroenterology Gastroenterology and hepatology SurgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
2018 Číslo 3
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
- Current Insights into the Antispasmodic and Analgesic Effects of Metamizole on the Gastrointestinal Tract
- Obstacle Called Vasospasm: Which Solution Is Most Effective in Microsurgery and How to Pharmacologically Assist It?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Vistaprep – the standard of bowel preparation before colonoscopy
- A tumorous atrioesophageal fistula as an unusual cause of septicemia
- Is Amanita phalloides poisoning still a problem?
- Experience in the treatment of severe bleeding in Crohn’s disease with anti-TNF therapy