Addictive diseases and poverty

Česká verzia

Authors: K. Nešpor ¹; J. Čapková ¹; L. Csémy ²
Authors place of work: Odděleni léčby závislostí – muži Psychiatrická léčebna Bohnice, Praha Ředitel: MUDr. Martin Hollý ¹; Psychiatrické centrum Praha Ředitel: Prof. MUDr. Cyril Höschl, DrSc. FRCPsych ²
Published in the journal: Prakt. Lék. 2010; 90(12): 735-738
Category: Of different specialties

Summary

The relationship between addictive disease and poverty is bidirectional. Addictive disease can lead to poverty and poverty-related stress, which in turn increases the risk of addictive diseases. Ideally, both of these problems should be addressed simultaneously. Material assistance to an actively dependent person does not improve their situation, but rather sometimes makes it even worse, particularly if given financial assistance. This can easily be exchanged for alcohol, drugs or used for gambling.

However, addictive diseases are more frequent in socially disadvantaged groups than in the general population. Assistance in these cases should help address the social situation and to overcome the addictive disease. Medical and psychotherapeutic work should take into account the social problems of patients and clients. On the other hand, social service employees should systematically employ brief interventions and other relevant procedures with clients with addictive diseases. There should be co-operation between the care services. This often happens in practice.

Key words:
addictive diseases, short intervention, poverty, alcohol, and drugs.

Zdroje

1. Cerdá, M., Diez-Roux, A.V., Tchetgen, E.T. et al. C. The relationship between neighborhood poverty and alcohol use: estimation by marginal structural models. Epidemiology 2010, 21(4), p. 490-493.

2. Crane, M., Byrne, K., Fu, R. et al. The causes of homelessness in later life: findings from a 3-nation study. J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2005, 60(3), S152-159.

3. Dutra, L., Stathopoulou, G., Basden, S.L. et al. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 2008, 165(2), p. 179-187.

4. Fleming, M.F., Mundt, M.P., French, M.T. et al. Benefit-cost analysis of brief physician advice with problem drinkers in primary care settings. Med. Care 2000 38(1), p. 7-18.

5. Jha, P., Chaloupka, F.C. Curbing the epidemic: Governments and the economics of tobacco control. The World Bank 1999. Available: http://www1.worldbank.org/tobacco/.

6. Johansson, E., Böckerman, P., Uutela, A. Alcohol consumption and sickness absence: evidence from microdata. Eur. J. Public Health 2009,19(1), p. 19-22.

7. Koski, A., Sirén, R., Vuori, E., Poikolainen, K. Alcohol tax cuts and increase in alcohol-positive sudden deaths: a time-series intervention analysis. Addiction 2007, 102(3), p. 362-368.

8. Lawyers and substance abuse [on-line]. Dostupné na www.thefreelibrary.com/Lawyers+and+substance+abuse-a063129384. [cit. 2010-12-06]

9. Mulia, N., Ye, Y., Greenfield, T.K., Zemore, S.E. Disparities in alcohol-related problems among white, black, and Hispanic Americans. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2009, 33(4) p. 654-662.

10. Nešpor, K., Scheansová, A., Karbanová, H. Zadluženost lidí s návykovými nemocemi je zdravotní i společenský problém. Čas. Lék Čes 2010, 149, s. 38-40.

11. Nešpor, K, Scheansová, A. Návykové nemoci a peníze – důležité souvislosti. Čas Lék. čes. 2009, 148(7), p. 335-337.

12. Nešpor, K. Návykové chování a závislost. Třetí aktualizované vydání. Praha: Portál 2007; 176 s.

13. Nešpor, K. Organizace Anonymní alkoholici přestavuje efektivní pomoc závislým. Alkoholizmus a drogové závislosti (Bratislava) 2002, 37( 3), s. 167-175.

14. Nešpor, K., Csémy, L. Alkohol, drogy a vaše děti. Jak problémům předcházet, jak je rozpoznávat, jak je zvládat. 5. revidované vydání. Praha: Sportpropag 2003; 104. Volně ke stažení z www.drnespor.eu.

15. Rehm, J., Mathers, C., Popova, S. et al. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet 2009, 373(9682), p. 2223-2233.

16. Robitaille, E., Herjean, P. An analysis of the accessibility of video lottery terminals: the case of Montréal. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2008; 18(7), p. 2.

17. Segal, D.S., Stockwell, T. Low alcohol alternatives: a promising strategy for reducing alcohol related harm. Int. J. Drug Policy 2009 20(2), p. 183-187.

18. Siahpush, M., Wakefield, M.A., Spittal, M.J. et al. Taxation reduces social disparities in adult smoking prevalence. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009 36(4) p. 285-291.

19. Sigmon, S.C., Higgins, S.T. Voucher-based contingent reinforcement of marijuana abstinence among individuals with serious mental illness. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2006, 30(4), p. 291-295.

20. Sovinová, H., Csémy, L. Socio-economic aspects of alcohol consumption and related problems based on current research in the Czech adult population. EPHA Conference Health in the Enlarged EU, Bratislava 16.-17. 4. 2007.

21. van Laere, I.R., de Wit, M.A., Klazinga, N.S. Pathways into homelessness: recently homeless adults problems and service use before and after becoming homeless in Amsterdam. BMC Public Health 2009, 7, 9 p. 3.

22. Volpp, K.G., Troxel, A.B., Pauly, M.V. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360(7), p. 699-709.

23. Wagenaar, A.C., Salois, M.J., Komro, K.A. Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: a meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. Addiction 2009 104(2), p. 179-190.

24. Welte, J.W., Wieczorek, W.F., Barnes, G.M. et al. The relationship of ecological and geographic factors to gambling behavior and pathology. J. Gambl. Stud. 2004, 20(4), p. 405-423.