The importance of gait as the most natural physical activity in the human life style
Authors:
J. Novák
Authors place of work:
Vedoucí: doc. MUDr. Jitka Švíglerová, Ph. D.
; Ústav tělovýchovného lékařství LF UK v Plzni
Published in the journal:
Prakt. Lék. 2018; 98(4): 158-165
Category:
Of different specialties
Summary
It appears that healthy adults can take anywhere between approximately 4,000 and 18,000 steps/day. However, not only total number of steps/day is important to evoke adaptive response, but results of controlled studies of treadmill and over-ground walking demonstrate that there is between 64–170 steps/minute. 10,000 steps/day is a reasonable target for healthy adults. It seems that 100 steps/minute represents a reasonable value (i.e. 3 METs and more) that can be useful as a recommendable level of moderate intensity walking. For subjects who obtain higher fitness level the intensity of daily physical activity must be also higher – using suitable other forms of physical activity (jogging, swimming, biking, cross-country skiing etc.). 30 minutes walking on that cadence requires a minimum of 3,000 steps.
Added to usual daily number of steps recommended equivalent of 7,000 to 11,000 steps/day could be easily accomplished. To avoid the adverse health consequences, related to everyday excess of continuous sitting it is recommended that seated-based work should be regularly broken up for 2 to 5 minutes with standing-based work, the use of sit-stand desks, or the taking of short active exercise breaks every 30 minutes.
Keywords:
gait – physical activity – lifestyle
Zdroje
1. Bernaciková M, Kalichová M, Beránková L. Základy sportovní kineziologie. Brno: FSS Masarykovy Univerzity 2010.
2. Hislop HJ, Waters RL. Metabolic energy cost of unrestrained walking. Phys Ther 1976; 56(9): 1019–1024.
3. Cacek J, a kol. Zjišťování úrovně pohybové aktivity (inaktivity) u vybraných věkových skupin mužů a žen v ČR. Brno: FSS Masarykovy univerzity 2014.
4. Crawford B. Recommended walking distances [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.livestrong.com/article/178069-recommended-walking-distances/ [cit. 6-6-2018].
5. Daněk K. Chůze znovu objevená. Praha: Olympia 1989.
6. Dempsey PC, Larsen RN, Sethi P, et al. Benefits for type 2 diabetes of interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light walking or simple resistance activities. Diabetes Care 2016; 39: 964–972.
7. Diaz KM, Howard VJ, Hutto B, et al. Patterns of sedentary behavior and mortality in U.S. middle-aged and older adults: A national cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2017; 167: 465–475.
8. Donovan L. Here’s how much the average American walks every day [online]. Dostupné z: http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-how-much-the-average-american-walks-every-day-2015-7 [cit. 6-6-2018].
9. Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K, Chaves PH, Johnson BA. Preclinical mobility disability predicts incident mobility disability in older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000; 55: M43–M52.
10. Hall C, Figueroa A, Fernhall B, Kanaley JA. Energy expenditure of walking and running: comparison with prediction equations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(12): 2128–2134.
11. Hamřík S, a kol. Zdraví 2020. Národní strategie ochrany a podpory zdraví a prevence nemocí. Praha: MZ ČR 2015.
12. Hatano Y. Use of the pedometer for promoting daily walking exercise. ICHPER J 1993; 29: 4–28.
13. Levine JA. The chairman’s curse: lethal sitting. Mayo Clinic Proc 2014; 89 (8): 1030–1032.
14. Levine JA. Lethal sitting: homo sedentarius seeks answers. Physiology (Bethesda) 2014; 29(5): 300–301.
15. Mitáš J, Frömel K. Pohybová aktivita dospělé populace České republiky: přehled základních ukazatelů za období 2005–2009. Těl. Kult. 2011; 34(1): 9–21.
16. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. A philosophical position on physical activity & fitness for physical activity professionals [Position statement]. Reston, VA 2010.
17. Novák J, Přibil M, Sobotková L, a kol. Společenský význam stezek zdatnosti. Plzeň. Lék. Sborn. 1980; 48: 71–76.
18. Pravidla atletiky. Pravidla IAAF ve znění příručky Competition Rules 2016–2017. Praha: ČAS 2015.
19. Procházková S. 10 věcí, které musíte vědět o chůzi batolat [online]. Dostupné z: https://mojebetynka.maminka.cz/clanek/10-veci-ktere-musite-vedet-o-chuzi-batolat#part=1 [cit. 6-6-2018].
20. Přidalová M, Riegerová J. Funkční anatomie II. Olomouc: Hanex 2009.
21. Schrack JA, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L. The relationship of the energetic cost of slow walking and peak energy expenditure to gait speed in mid-to-late life. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 92(1): 28–35.
22. Sekot A. Pohybové aktivity perspektivou sociologie. In: Sekot A. Výzkum v sociologii sportu I. Brno: Masarykova univerzita 2013; 8–39.
23. Sekot A. Pohybové aktivity – nedílná součást aktivního způsobu života. In: Pohybová aktivita dospělé populace v ČR. Brno: Masarykova univerzita 2013; 7–33.
24. Slepička P, Slepičková I. Sport z pohledu české společnosti. Čes. kinantropologie 2002; 6(1): 7–23.
25. Šlágr J. Fyziologie chůze. Česká obuvnická asociace Zlín [online]. Dostupné z: http://webnet.wz.cz/nem_priz/chuze.html [cit. 6-6-2018].
26. Šimčíková T. Sportovní volnočasové aktivity jako podpora zdravého životního stylu. Olomouc: Pedagogická fakulta UP 2010.
27. Thyfault JP, Mengmeng D, Kraus WE, et al. Physiology of sedentary behavior and its relationship to health outcomes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015; 47(6): 1301–1305.
28. Tudor-Locke C, Myers A. Methodological considerations for researchers and practitioners using pedometers to measure physical (ambulatory) activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 2001; 72(1): 1–12.
29. Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR Jr. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med 2004; 34(1): 1–8.
30. Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Brown WJ, et al. How many steps/day are enough? for adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011; 8: 79–85.
31. Tudor-Locke C, Rowe DA. Using cadence to study free-living ambulatory behavior. Sports Med. 2012; 42(5): 381–398.
32. Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Thyfault JP, Spence JC. A step-defined sedentary lifestyle index: < 5,000 steps/day. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2013; 38(2): 100–114.
33. Vaculík M. Pohybové aktivity jako nedílná součást aktivního způsobu života. Diplomová práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita 2016.
34. Vařeka I. Dynamická funkce nohy při chůzi. In: Vařeka I, Vařeková R. Kineziologie nohy. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého 2009.
35. Waters RL, Hislop HJ, Perry J, et al. Comparative cost of walking in young and old adults. J Orthop Res 1983; 1(1): 73–76.
36. 6000 kroků denně změní váš život [online]. Dostupné z: http://6000kroku.cz [cit. 6-6-2018].
Štítky
General practitioner for children and adolescents General practitioner for adultsČlánok vyšiel v časopise
General Practitioner
2018 Číslo 4
- Memantine Eases Daily Life for Patients and Caregivers
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Advances in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis on the Horizon
- What Effect Can Be Expected from Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Endometriosis and its effect on fertility and quality of life – literature review
- Imaging methods in pregnancy – indications and contraindications and use of contrast media
- Disability pension against social stress?
- The importance of gait as the most natural physical activity in the human life style