Quality of life of residents in facilities for seniors
Authors:
M. Lezovic; M. Mucska; Z. Holosova
Authors place of work:
Fakulta verejného zdravotníctva SZU, Bratislava
Published in the journal:
Geriatrie a Gerontologie 2015, 4, č. 1: 13-18
Category:
Original Article/Study
Summary
Quality of life has proven to be an important variable in the interaction between humans and disease. The goal of this work is to assess the quality of life for seniors, where we wanted to see how these people evaluate key areas of their lives. The study group consisted of 183 residents of homes for the elderly with institutional care. For data collection we used the WHOQOL-Bref. Correlations of all WHOQOL-BREF domains questionnaire and questions about the quality of life and satisfaction with health were significant. 49 % men and women assessed their quality of life as good and 40 % men and 38 % of women were satisfied with their health. The strongest correlation quality of life is a psychological health. Another strong correlation is the domain of physical health.
Keywords:
quality of life - WHOQOL-BREF - elderly people - homes for elderly - Slovakia, - chronically ill patients - long term care
Zdroje
1. Dragomirecká E, Bartoňová J: Dotazník kvality života Světové zdravotnické organizace WHOQOL-BREF. Psychometrické vlastnosti a první zkušenosti s českou verzí. Psychiatrie 2006; 10(3): 144–149.
2. Dragomirecká E, Bartoňová J a kol. Příručka pro uživatele české verze dotazníků kvality života Světové zdravotnické organizace WHOQOL-BREF a WHOQOL-100. Psychiatrické centrum Praha 2006.
3. Žucha I, Čaplová T. Nekvalitný spôsob života. Slovenský lekár 2006; 16(30): 244–245.
4. Aigner M, et al. What does the WHOQOL-bref measure? Measurement overlap between quality of life and depressive symptomatology in chronic somatoform pain disorder. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2006; 41(1): 81–86.
5. Kováč D. Quality of life: a paradigmatic challenge to psychologists. Studia psychologica 2003; (45)2: 81–101.
6. Kováč D. Psychology of the quality of life in the activities of Slovak psychologists. Studia Psychologica 2007; 49(2): 101–116.
7. Gál F, Kollár M, Mesežnikov G. Vízia vývoja Slovenskej republiky do roku 2020. Bratislava: IVO 2003.
8. Rychtaříková J. Úspěšné stárnutí – leitmotiv 21. století. Demografie 2002; 44(1): 43–46.
9. Radková L, Bielová M. Spokojnosť občanov v domovoch dôchodcov ako súčasť kvality života. Geriatria 2004; 2(10): 59–64.
10. Von Steinbüchel N, et al. Assessing quality of life in older people: Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF. European Journal of Ageing 2006; 3(2): 116–122.
11. WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science & Medicine 1998; 46(12): 1569–1585.
12. De Castro MDGT, et al. WHOQOL-BREF psychometric properties in a sample of smokers. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 2007; 29(3): 254–257.
13. Moreno AB, et al. Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Abbreviated Instrument for Quality of Life Assessment in the Pró-Saúde Study. Cadernos de Saude Publica 2006; 22(12): 2585–2597.
14. Arslantas D, et al. Life quality and daily life activities of elderly people in rural areas, Eskişehir (Turkey). Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009; 48(2). 127–131.
15. Browne JP, et al. Individual quality of life in the healthy elderly. Qual Life Res 1994; 3(4): 235–44.
16. Lam DH, Power MJ. Social support in a general practice elderly sample. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1991; 2(6): 89–93.
17. Mroczek DK, Spiro A. Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the veterans affairs normative aging study. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005; 88(1): 189–202.
18. Heun R, et al. Internal and external validity of the WHO well-being scale in the elderly general population. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999; 99(3): 171–8.
19. Bonsignore M, et al. Validity of the five-item WHO well-being index (WHO-5) in an elderly population. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001; (Suppl. 2)251: 27–31.
20. Lin TH, Yao G. Evaluating item discrimination power of WHOQOL-BREF from an item response model perspectives. Soc Indicators Res 2009; 91(2): 141–5.
21. Brazier JE, et al. Using the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly population. Quality of Life Research 1996; 5(2): 195–204.
22. Sakthong P, et al. Psychometric properties of WHOQOL-BREF-THAI in patients with HIV/AIDS. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2007; 90(11): 2449–2460.
23. Jaracz K, et al. Quality of life in Polish respondents: Psychometric properties of the Polish WHOQOL – Bref. Scand J Caring Sci 2006; 20(3): 251–260.
24. Paskulin L, Vianna L, Molzahn AE. Factors associated with quality of life of brazilian older adults. Int Nurs Rev 2009; 56(1): 109–15.
25. Dragomirecká E, Prajsová J. WHOQOL-OLD. Příručka pro uživatele české verze dotazníku Světové zdravotnické organizace pro měření kvality života ve vyšším věku. Praha: Psychiatrické centrum Praha 2009.
26. Farquhar M. Elderly people’s definitions of quality of life. Social Science and Medicine 1995; 41(10):1439–1446.
27. Dragomirecká E, et al. Demographic and psychosocial correlates of quality of life in the elderly from a cross-cultural perspective. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 2008; 15 (3): 193–204.
28. Bodur S, Dayanir CD. Using WHOQOL-BREF to evaluate quality of life among Turkish elders in different residential environments. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 2009; 13(7): 652–656.
29. Ikin JF, et al. Life satisfaction and quality in Korean war veterans five decades after the war. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009; 63(5): 359–365.
30. Chachamovich E, Trentini C, Fleck MP. Assessment of the psychometric performance of the WHOQOL-BREF instrument in a sample of Brazilian older adults. International Psychogeriatrics 2007; 19(4): 635–646.
31. Rukwong P, Chirawatkul S, Markovic M. Quality of life perceptions of middle-aged women living with a disability in Muang district, Khon Kaen, Thailand: WHOQOL perspective. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2007; 90(8):1640–1646.
32. Paskulin LMG, Molzahn A. Quality of life of older adults in Canada and Brazil. West J Nurs Res 2007. 29(1):10–26.
33. Ležovič M. Kvalita života dialyzovaných pacientov. Lekársky obzor 2011; 60(2): 70–75.
Štítky
Geriatrics General practitioner for adults Orthopaedic prostheticsČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Geriatrics and Gerontology
2015 Číslo 1
- Memantine Eases Daily Life for Patients and Caregivers
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Advances in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis on the Horizon
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Acute pancreatitis, a feared diagnosis among the elderly
- Tinnitus – a frequently ignored problem
- Quality of life of residents in facilities for seniors
- Tuberculosis in old age