Probiotics in acute pancreatitis – a randomised, placebo- controlled, double‑blind study

Česká verzia

Authors: J. Lata ¹; J. Juránková ²; O. Stibůrek ¹; V. Příbramská ¹; M. Šenkyřík ¹; T. Vaňásek ¹
Authors place of work: Interní hepatogastroenterologická klinika Lékařské fakulty MU a FN Brno, pracoviště Bohunice, přednosta prof. MU Dr. Jan Lata, CSc., 2Oddělení klinické mikrobiologie FN Brno, pracoviště Bohunice, přednostka prim. MU Dr. Alena Ševčíková ¹
Published in the journal: Vnitř Lék 2010; 56(2): 111-114
Category: Original Contributions

Summary

Introduction:
Infections accompanying pancreatitis, particularly pancreatic necroses, represent a serious complication associated with worsening of the disease prognosis. The aim of our study was to explore whether this complication could be prevented by administering a probiotic.

Methods:
The probiotic was administered to 7 patients and placebo to 15. The study was discontinued early following the release of the Propatria study results.

Results:
There was no death in our patient sample and there was no difference between the two groups in microbial colonisation or the length of hospitalization. However, a reduction in endotoxin levels on day 7 and 10 of the hospitalization was observed in the probiotic‑treated group.

Conclusion:
Based on the current knowledge, administration of probiotics in this indication is contraindicated. Nonetheless, reduction in endotoxin levels suggests a positive effect of probiotics on bacterial translocation, the importance of which should be evaluated in the future.

Key words:
acute pancreatitis – probiotics – endotoxin – bacterial translocation

Zdroje

1. Bauer TM, Schwacha H, Steinbruckner B et al. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in human cirrhosis is associated with systemic endotoxemia. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 2364– 2370.

2. Timmerman HM, Koning CJM, Mulder Let al. Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics. A comparison of functionality and efficacy. Int J Food Microbiol 2004; 96: 219– 233.

3. Neoptolemos JP, Rarety M, Finch M et al. Acute pancreatitis: the substantial human and financial costs. Gut 1998; 42: 886– 891.

4. Baron TH, Morgan DE. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1412– 1417.

5. Isenmann R. Prophylactic antibiotik treatment in patients with predicted severe acute pankreatitis: a placebo‑ controlled, double‑blind trial. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 997– 1004.

6. Mazaki T, Ishii Y, Takayama T. Meta‑analysis of prophylactic antibiotic use in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 674– 678.

7. Špičák J, Hejtmánková S, Hubaczová Met al. Antibiotická profylaxe infekčních komplikací u akutní pankreatitidy – výsledky randomizované studie s meropenemem. Čes Slov Gastroent Hepatol 2003; 57: 222– 227.

8. Powell JJ, Campbell E, Johnson CD et al. Survey of antibiotic prophylaxis in acute pancreatitis in the UK and Ireland. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 320– 328.

9. Banks BA, Freeman ML et al. Practice Guidelines in Acute Pankreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2379– 2400.

10. UK Working Party on Acute Pankreatitis. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 2005; 54; 1– 9.

11. Havenaar R, Ten Brink B, Huisin’t Veld JHJ. Selection of strains for probiotic use. In: Fuller R (ed): Probiotics: the scientific basis. London: Chapman and Hall 1992: 209– 224.

12. van Minnen LP. Acute pancreatitis – Surgery, pathophysiology, probiotic prophylaxis. The Netherlands: Gildeprint Drukkerijen BV, Enschede 2006.

13. Olah A, Belagyi T, Issekutz A et al. Randomized clinical trial of specific lactobacillus and fibre supplement to early enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1103– 1107.

14. Besselink MGH, van Santvoort HC, Buskens E et al. Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double‑blind, placebo- controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 371: 651– 659.