Contribution to the evaluation of serum levels of selected biological parameters in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and in individual clinical stages of multiple myeloma

Česká verzia

Authors: V. Ščudla ¹; P. Petrová ²; J. Minařík ¹; T. Pika ¹; M. Budíková ² ; J. Bačovský ¹; Š. Repovský ³; Česká Myelomová Skupina
Authors place of work: III. interní klinika Lékařské fakulty UP a FN Olomouc, přednosta prof. MU Dr. Vlastimil Ščudla, CSc. 2Oddělení klinické biochemie FN Olomouc, přednosta prof. MU Dr. Martin Petřek, CSc. 3Hematologicko transfuzní oddělení Nemocnice Přerov, přednosta prim. ¹
Published in the journal: Vnitř Lék 2010; 56(6): 591-601
Category: 65th Birthday - Petr Svacina, MD

Summary

Introduction:
This study aimed to measure serum levels of 12 selected parameters in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and initial, asymptomatic phase of multiple myeloma (MM) to assess their potential benefit in differentiating both conditions. Patient sample and methodology: The analysed sample of 131 patients consisted of 62 patients with MGUS and 69 patients with MM fulfilling the criteria of the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG). The following techniques were used to assess serum levels: quantitative immunoradiometry (bone‑type alkaline phosphatase – bALP and insulin‑like growth factor- 1 – IGF‑1), chemiluminescent enzyme immunochemical reaction (parathormone – PTH), quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay (osteopontin – OPN, endostatin (ES), macrophage inflammatory protein‑1α/ β – MIP‑1α/ β, angiogenin – ANG a IL‑17). Pearson χ² test and Mann‑Whitney U- test were applied during the statistical analysis. Results: The analysis showed statistically significant differences in serum concentrations between MGUS and symptomatic form of MM (Durie- Salmon (D‑ S) stage 2– 3) for: albumin, β₂- microglobulin (β₂- M) and OPN (p = 0.0001 and < 0.0001); osteocalcin for stage 2 (p = 0.006) and MIP‑1α for stage 3 patients (p = 0.0002). Using the International Staging System (ISS), statistically significant differences between MGUS and all stages of MM (1– 3) were identified for albumin and OPN (p = 0.003 and 0.001 and 0.00009, respectively), stages 2 and 3 for β₂– M and ES (p = 0.015 and 0.0001, respectively), stage 2 for ANG (p = 0.014) and stage 3 for MIP‑1α (p = 0.00001). Statistically significant differences between MGUS and initial, asymptomatic phase of MM (D‑ S stage 1) was found only for bALP (p = 0.01) and for albumin (p = 0.004) and OPN (p = 0.003) when ISS was applied. Renal function impairment (D‑ S substage B) showed in comparison to MGUS significant elevation of serum levels of β₂– M (p < 0.0001), OC (p = 0.011), IGF‑1 (p = 0.014), OPN (p = 0.003), ES (p = 0.0001), MIP‑1α (p = 0.0004) and ANG (p = 0.005) and for albumin (p < 0.0001), β₂- M (p < 0.0001) and OPN (p < 0.0001) only when compared to substage A. Conclusion: Only albumin and OPN showed useful even though non‑specific potential to differentiate MGUS from all ISS stages of MM, β₂- M and ES for ISS stages 2 and 3, the other parameters differed for stage 2 (ANG), stage 3 (MIP‑1α) only and stage 1 (bALP), stage 2 (OC) and stage 3 (MIP‑1α) when D‑ S stratification was applied.

Key words:
monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance – multiple myeloma – clinical stages – biochemical markers – endogenous factors – osteopontin

Zdroje

1. Urashima M, Chen BP, Chen S et al. The development of a model for the homing of multiple myeloma cells to human bone marrow. Blood 1997; 90: 754– 765.

2. Hideshima T, Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM et al. Advances in biology of multiple myeloma: clinical applications. Blood 2004; 104: 607– 618.

3. International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the clasification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol 2003; 121: 749– 757.

4. Ščudla V, Budíková M, Petrová P et al. Analýza sérových hladin vybraných biologických ukazatelů u monoklonální gamapatie nejistého významu a mnohočetného myelomu. Klin Onkol 2010; 23: 171–181.

5. Ščudla V, Budíková M, Pika T et al. Srovnání sérových hladin vybraných biologických působků u monoklonální gamapatie nejistého významu a mnohočetného myelomu. Čas Lék Čes 2009; 148: 315– 322.

6. Scudla V, Pika T, Budiková M et al. The importance of serum levels of selected biological parameters in the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of multiple myeloma. Neoplasma 2010; 57: 102– 110.

7. Durie BG, Salmon SE. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer 1975; 36: 842– 854.

8. Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 3412– 3420.

9. Hájek R, Adam Z, Maisnar V et al. Česká myelomová skupina. Souhrn doporučení 2009 „Diagnostika a léčba mnohočetného myelomu“. Transfuze Hematol Dnes 2009; 15 (Suppl 2): 1– 80.

10. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smouldering multiple myeloma: emphasis on risk factor for progression. Br J Haematol 2007; 139: 730– 743.

11. Vacca A, Ria R, Ribatti D et al. A paracrine loop in the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway triggers tumor angiogenesis and growth in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2003; 88: 176– 185.

12. Pour L, Hájek R, Buchler T et al. Angiogeneze a antiangiogenní terapie u nádorů. Vnitř Lék 2004; 50: 930– 938.

13. Corso A, Arcaini L, Mangiacavalli S et al. Biochemical markers of bone disease in asymptomatic early stage multiple myeloma. A study on their role in identifying high risk patients. Haematologica 2001; 86: 394– 398.

14. Fonseca R, Trendle MC, Leong T et al. Prognostic value of serum markers of bone metabolism in untreated multiple myeloma patients. Br J Haematol 2000; 109: 24– 29.

15. Abildgaard N, Bentzen SM, Nielsen JL et al. Nordic Myeloma Study Group (NMSG). Serum markers of bone metabolism in multiple myeloma: Prognostic value of the carboxy‑terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP). Br J Haematol 1997; 96: 103– 110.

16. Laroche M, Attal M, Dromer C et al. Bone remodelling in monoclonal gammopathies of uncertain significance, symptomatic and nonsymptomatic myeloma. Clin Rheumatol 1996; 15: 347– 352.

17. Alexandrakis MG, Passam FH, Malliaraki N et al. Evaluation of bone disease in multiple myeloma: a correlation between biochemical markers of bone metabolism and other clinical parameters in untreated multiple myeloma patients. Clin Chim Acta 2002; 325: 51– 57.

18. Carlson K, Larsson A, Simonsson B et al. Evaluation of bone disease in multiple myeloma: a comparison between the resorption markers urinary deoxypyridinoline/ creatinine (DPD) and serum ICTP, and an evaluation of the DPD/ osteocalcin and ICT/ osteocalcin ratios. Eur J Haematol 1999; 62: 300– 306.

19. Abildgaard N, Glerup H, Rungby J et al. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism reflect osteoclastic and osteoblastic activity in multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 2000; 64: 121– 129.

20. Woitge HW, Horn E, Keck AV et al. Biochemical markers of bone formation in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias and benign osteoporosis. Clin Chem 2001; 47: 686– 693.

21. Bataille R, Chappard D, Klein B. Mechanisms of bone lesions in multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1992; 6: 285– 295.

22. Terpos E. Biochemické markery kostního metabolismu u mnohočetného myelomu. Cancer Treat Rev 2006; 32 (Suppl 1): 15– 19.

23. Bataille R, Delmas PD, Chappard D et al. Abnormal serum bone GLA protein levels in multiple myeloma: crucial role of bone formation and prognostic implications. Cancer 1990; 66: 167– 172.

24. Heider V, Fleissner C, Zavrski I et al. Bone markers in multiple myeloma. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 1544– 1553.

25. Fraser WD, Logue FC, Gallacher SJ et al. Direct and indirect assessment of the parathyroid hormone response to pamidronate therapy in Paget’s disease of bone and hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Bone Miner 1991; 12: 113– 121.

26. Renzulli MR, Terragna C, Testoni N et al. Insulin‑like growth factor 1 (IGF‑1) is overexpressed in multiple myeloma plasma cells (PC) and regulates the expression of the IGF‑1 receptor. Haematologica 2006; 91: 87.

27. Menu E, van Valckenborgh E, van Camp B et al. The role of the insulin‑like growth factor 1 receptor axis in multiple myeloma. Arch Physiol Biochem 2009; 115: 49– 57.

28. Hsu JH, Shi Y, Krajewski S et al. The AKT kinase is activated in multiple myeloma tumor cells. Blood 2001; 98: 2853– 2855.

29. Greco C, Vitelli G, Vercillo G et al. Reduction of serum IGF‑1 levels in patients affected with monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance or multiple myeloma. Comparison with bFGF, VEGF and k‑ ras gene mutation. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2009; 28: 35.

30. Robbiani DF, Colon K, Ely S et al. Osteopontin dysregulation and lytic bone lesions in multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol 2007; 25: 16– 20.

31. Gravallese EM. Osteopontin: a bridge between bone and the immune system. J Clin Invest 2003; 112: 147– 149.

32. Johnston NI, Gunasekharan VK, Ravindranath A et al. Osteopontin as a target for cancer therapy. Front Biosci 2008; 13: 4361– 4372.

33. Stifter S, Valkovic T, Nacinovic‑ Duletic et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor, osteopontin and NF‑ κB/ P65 expression in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2008; 93: 80.

34. Saeki Y, Mima T, Ishii T et al. Enhanced production of osteopontin in multiple myeloma: clinical and pathogenic implications. Br J Haematol 2003; 123: 263– 270.

35. Standal T, Hjorth‑ Hansen H, Rasmussen T et al. Osteopontin is an adhesive factor for myeloma cells and is found in increased levels in plasma from patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2004; 89: 174– 182.

36. Rajkumar SV, Mesa RA, Fonseca R et al. Bone marrow angiogenesis in 400 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, multiple myeloma, and primary amyloidosis. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 2210– 2216.

37. Pour L, Svachova H, Adam Z et al. Pretreatment hepatocyte growth factor and thrombospondin‑1 levels predict response to high‑dose chemotherapy for multiple myeloma. Neoplasma 2010; 57: 29– 34.

38. Ergün S, Kilic N, Wurmback JH et al. Endostatin inhibits angiogenesis by stabilization of newly formed endothelial tubes. Angiogenesis 2001; 4: 193– 206.

39. Terpos E, Politou M, Szydlo R et al. Serum levels of macrophage inflammatory protein‑1 a (MIP‑1α) correlate with the extent of bone disease and survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2003; 123: 106– 109.

40. Abe M, Hiura K, Wilde J et al. Role for macrophage inflammatory protein MIP‑1α and MIP‑1β in the development of osteolytic lesions in multiple myeloma. Blood 2002; 100: 2195– 2202.

41. Choi SJ, Cruz JC, Craig F et al. Macrophage inflammatory protein 1– a is a potential osteoclast stimulatory factor in multiple myeloma. Blood 2000; 96: 671– 675.

42. Lentzsch S, Gries M, Janz M et al. Macrophage inflammatory protein 1- a (MIP‑1α) triggers migration and signaling cascades mediating survival and proliferation in multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Blood 2003; 101: 3568– 3573.

43. Terpos E, Tasidou A, Roussou M et al. Increased expression of macrophage inflammatory protein‑1α on trephine biopsies correlates with advanced myeloma, extensive bone disease and elevated microvessel density in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2009; 94: 146.

44. Terpos E, Anagnostopoulos A, Kastritis E et al. The combination of bortezomib melphalan, dexamethasone and intermittent thalidomide (VMDT) is an effectie regimen for relapsed/ refractory myeloma and reduces serum levels of RANKL, MIP1A and angiogenic cytokines. Haematologica 2006; 91: 84.

45. Dhodapkar KM, Barbuto S, Matthews Pet al. Dendritic cells mediate the induction of polyfunctional human IL17- producing cells (Th17- 1 cells) enriched in the bone marrow of patients with myeloma. Blood 2008; 112: 2878– 2885.