Diagnosis of gastrointestinal motility disorders

Česká verzia

Authors: Jana Koželuhová; Karel Balihar; Lucie Zdrhová
Authors place of work: Gastroenterologické a hepatologické oddělení I. interní kliniky LF UK a FN Plzeň
Published in the journal: Vnitř Lék 2018; 64(6): 611-620
Category: Reviews

Summary

Gastrointestinal motility and the effects on luminal contents that are brought about by it can be studied in several ways. In clinical practice, manometry remains one of the most important investigational techniques, in particular for oesophageal and anorectal disorders. Radiographic examination of bolus transit through the gastrointestinal tract also continues to be a valuable tool. Scintigraphy still is the standard for assessment of gastric emptying, but ¹³C breath tests are an alternative. Many other techniques are used mainly in the context of scientific research but some of these may become incorporated in the diagnostic armamentarium.

Key words:

breath tests – conventional manometry – high-resolution manometry – radiodiagnostic methods – scintigraphy

Zdroje

Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T et al. Achalasia – A New Clinically Relevant Classification by High-Resolution Manometry- Gastroenterology 2008; 135(5): 1526–1533. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.022>.
Conclin J, Pimentel M, Soffer E (eds). Color Atlas of High Resolution Manometry. Springer 2009. ISBN 978–0387882925.
Wang A, Pleskow DK, Banerjee S et al. [ASGE Technology Committee]. Esophageal function testing. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76(2)2: 231–243. Dostupné z DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.022>.
Fox M. High resolution manometry – an introduction. 2006. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.synmed.se/res/ManoScan360/HRM_-Primer_Mark-Fox_29306.pdf>.
Bharucha AE. Recent advances in functional anorectal disorders. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2011; 13(4): 316–322. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11894–011–0194–8>.
Whitehead WE, Bharucha AE. Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic floor disorders: what‘s new and what to do. Gastroenterology 2010; 138(4): 1231–1235. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2010.02.036>.
Lee YY, Erdogan A, Rao SS. High resolution and high definition anorectal manometry and pressure topography: diagnostic advance or a new kid on the block? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2013; 15(12): 360. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11894–013–0360–2>.
Deutekom M, Terra MP, Dobben AC et al. Selecting an outcome measure for evaluating treatment in fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48(12): 2294–2301. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350–005–0162–1>.
Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A et al. AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 1999; 116(3): 735–760.
Jones MP, Post J, Crowell MD. High-resolution manometry in the evaluation of anorectal disorders: a simultaneous comparison with water-perfused manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102(4): 850–855. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1572–0241.2007.01069.x>.
Lee YY, Erdogan A, Rao SS. High resolution and high definition anorectal manometry and pressure topography: diagnostic advance or a new kid on the block? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2013; 15(12): 360. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11894–013–0360–2>.
Carrington EV, Brokjaer A, Craven H et al. Traditional measures of normal anal sphincter function using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in 115 healthy volunteers. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26(5): 625–635. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12307>.
Jung KW, Joo S, Yang DH et al. A novel high-resolution anorectal manometry parameter based on a three-dimensional integrated pressurized volume of a spatiotemporal plot, for predicting balloon expulsion in asymptomatic normal individuals. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26(7): 937–949. Dostupné z DOI:<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12347>.
Bredenoord AJ, Hebbard GS. Technical aspects of clinical high-resolution manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(Suppl 1): S5-S10. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2982.2011.01830.x>.
Rao SS. Advances in diagnostic assessment of fecal incontinence and dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8(11): 910–919. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2010.06.004>.
Bharucha AE, Rao SS. An update on anorectal disorders for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 2014; 146(1): 37–45. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.062>.
Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, Noelting J et al. Phenotypic identification and classification of functional defecatory disorders using high-resolution anorectal manometry. Gastroenterology 2013; 144(2): 314–322. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.049>.
Ekberg O, Olsson R. Dynamic radiology of swallowing disorders. Endoscopy 1997; 29(6): 439–446. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007–1004248>.
Summerton SL. Radiographic evaluation of esophageal function. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2005; 15(2): 231–242. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2004.10.008>.
Kostic SV, Rice TW, Baker ME et al. Timed barium esophagogram: a simple physiologic assessment for achalasia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 120(5): 935–943. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2000.110463>.
Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR et al. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology 1987; 92(1): 40–47.
Chaussade S, Khyari A, Roche H et al. Determination of total and segmental colonic transit time in constipated patients. Dig Dis Sci 1989; 34(8): 1168–1172.
Evans RC, Kamm MA, Hinton JM et al. The normal range and a simple diagram for recording whole gut transit time. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992; 7(1): 15–17.
Cann PA, Read NW, Holdsworth CD et al. Role of loperamide and placebo in management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Dig Dis Sci 1984; 29(3): 239–247.
Horowitz M, Maddox AF, Wishart JM et al. Relationships between oesophageal transit and solid and liquid gastric emptying in diabetes mellitus. Eur J Nucl Med 1991; 18(4): 229–234.
Abell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K et al. Consensus recommendation for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103(3): 753–763. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1572–0241.2007.01636.x>.
Kazem I. A new scintigraphic technique for the study of the esophagus. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1972; 115(4): 681–688.
Farmer AD, Wegeberg AML, Brock B et al. Regional gastrointestinal contractility parameters using the wireless motility capsule: inter-observer reproducibility and influence of age, gender and study country. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018; 47(3): 391–400. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.14438>.
Saad RJ. The wireless motility capsule: One-stop shop for evaluation of GI motility disorders. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2016; 18(3): 14. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11894–016–0489-x>.
Bennink RJ, van den Elzen BD, Kuiken SD et al. Noninvasive measurement of gastric accommodation by means of pertechnetate SPECT: limiting radiation dose without losing image quality. J Nucl Med 2004; 45(1): 147–152.
van den Elzen BD, Bennink RJ, Wieringa RE et al. Fundic accommodation assessed by SPECT scanning: comparison with the gastric barostat. Gut 2003; 52(11): 1548–1554.
Parkman HP, Hasler WL, Barnet JL et al. Electrogastrography: a document prepared by the gastric section of the American Motility Society Clinical GI Motility Testing Task Force. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2003; 15(2): 89–102.