Feedings of Critical Care Patients by Endoscopic Three-luminal Tube – A Retrospective Analysis
Authors:
K. Balihar 1; I. Novák 1; A. Kroužecký 1; J. Raděj 1; R. Sýkora 1; J. Chvojka 1; J. Koželuhová 1; J. Baliharová 1; I. Chytra 2; M. Matějovič 1
Authors place of work:
JIP, I. interní klinika LF UK a FN, Plzeň
1; Anesteziologicko-resuscitační klinika FN, Plzeň
2
Published in the journal:
Čas. Lék. čes. 2008; 147: 516-520
Category:
Original Article
Summary
Background.
Enteral nutrition (EN) represents a preferred type of nutritional support in critical care patients, in spite of the high incidence of intolerance. One of the methods which can speed up the delivery of adequate amounts of food is to switch from the gastric to post-pyloric feeding. A three-luminal tube (TLT) enables post-pyloric enteral feeding with accompanying gastric decompression. The aim of our study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of the endoscopically introduced TLT along with the estimation of the adequate dose of enteral nutrition.
Methods and Results.
Retrospective analysis of 111 critical care patients with 140 introduced TLT during 2003 to 2006 in two intensive care units (UIC) in the Teaching hospital in Plzen included patients of average age 54 years (± 15), APACHE II score 26 (± 10) and UIC mortality was 24%. Eight introductions were technically not successful (6%). Reintroduction of the tube was necessary in 21 patients (19%). The average time of tube introduction was 6 minutes (± 3). In direct relation to endoscopy no serious complication was observed. In our cohort, 34 ventilator-associated pneumonias developed (31%). Average time interval since the admission to the hospital till TLT introduction was 7 days (± 6). Evaluation of a subgroup of 77 patients from one UIC has shown that the adequate amount of EN was achieved in 82% of patients in 4 days (± 3) after the TLT introduction. In average, TLT was introduced for 11 days (± 7).
Conclusions.
Endoscopic TLT introduction represents a safe and reliable method which can ensure adequate amount of enteral nutrition in majority of critical care patients with gastrointestinal dysfunction. In our conditions, TLT is probably not sufficiently used.
Key words:
enteral nutrition, Intensive care, post-pyloric enteral feeding, three-luminal tube.
Zdroje
1. Braunschweig, C. L., Levy, P., Sheean, P. M., Wang, X.: Enteral compared with parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 2001, 74, s. 534–542.
2. Lipman, T. O.: Grains or veins: is enteral nutrition really better than parenteral nutrition? A look at the evidence. JPEN J. Parent. Ent. Nutrition, 1998, 22, s. 167–182.
3. Kreymann, K. G., Berger, M. M., Deutz, N. E. P. et al.: ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral nutrition: Intensive Care. Clinical Nutrition, 2006, 25, s. 210–223.
4. D. K., Dhalival, R., Drover, J. W. et al.: Canadian Clinical Praktice Guidelines for Nutrition Support in Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Adult Patient. 2003, 27, s. 355–373.
5. Kortbeek, J. B., Haigh, P. I., Doig, C.: Duodenal versus gastric feeding in ventilated blunt trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial. J. Trauma, 1999, 46, s. 992–996.
6. Montecalvo, M. A., Steger, K. A., Farber, H. W. et al.: Nutritional outcome and pneumonia in critical care patients randomized to gastric versus jejunal tube feedings. The Critical Care Research Team [see comments]. Crit. Care Med., 1992, 20, s. 1377–1387.
7. Tailor, S. J., Fettes, S. B., Jewkes, C., Nelson, R. J.: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial to determine the effect of early enhanced enteral nutrition on clinical outcome in mechanically ventilated patients suffering head injury. Crit. Care Med., 1999, 27, s. 2525–2531.
8. Boivin, M. A., Levy, H.: Gastric feeding with erythromycin is equivalent to transpyloric feeding in the critically ill. Crit. Care Med., 2001, 29, s. 1916–1919.
9. Esparza, J., Boivin, M. A., Hartshorne, M. F., Levy, H.: Equal aspiration rates in gastrically and transpylorically fed critically ill patients. Int. Care Med., 2001, 27, s. 660–664.
10. Kearns, P. J., Chin, D., Mueller, L. et al.: The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and success in nutrient delivery with gastric versus small intestinal feeding: a randomized clinical trial. Crit. Care Med., 2000, 28, s. 1742–1746.
11. Minard, G., Kudsk, K. A., Melton, S. et al.: Early versus delayed feeding with an immune-enhancing diet in patients with severe head injuries. JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr., 2000, 24, s. 145–149.
12. Montejo, J. C., Grau, T., Acosta, J. et al.: Multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind study comparing the efficacy and gastrointestinal complications of early jejunal feeding with early gastric feeding in critically ill patients. Crit. Care Med., 2000, 30, s. 796–800.
13. Neumann, D. A., Delegge, M. H.: Gastric versus small-bowel tube feeding in the intensive care unit: a prospective comparison of efficacy. Crit. Care Med., 2002, 30, s. 1436–1438.
14. Day, L., Stotts, N. A., Frankfurt, A. et al.: Gastric versus duodenal feeding in patients with neurological disease: a pilot study. J Neurosci. Nurs., 2001, 33, s. 148–149.
15. Desmond, P., Raman, R., Idikula, J.: Effect of nasogastric tubes on the nose and maxillary sinus. Crit. Care Med., 1991, 19, s. 509–511.
16. Shang, E., Kahler, G., Meier-Hellmann, A., Scheele, J.: Advantages of endoscopic terapy of gastrojejunal feeding dissociation in critical care patients. Int. Care Med., 1999, 25, s. 162–165.
17. Davies, A. R., Froomes, P. R., French, C. J. et al.: Randomized comparison of nasojejunal and nasogastric feeding in critically ill patients. Crit. Care Med., 2002, 30, s. 714–716.
18. Krishnan, J. A., Parce, P. B., Martinez, A. et al.: Caloric intake in medical ICU patients: consistency of care with guidelines and relationship to clinical outcomes. Chest, 2003, 124, s. 297–305.
19. Marik, P. E., Zaloga, G. P.: Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review. Crit. Care Med., 2001, 29, s. 2264–2270.
Štítky
Addictology Allergology and clinical immunology Angiology Audiology Clinical biochemistry Dermatology & STDs Paediatric gastroenterology Paediatric surgery Paediatric cardiology Paediatric neurology Paediatric ENT Paediatric psychiatry Paediatric rheumatology Diabetology Pharmacy Vascular surgery Pain management Dental HygienistČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Journal of Czech Physicians
- Advances in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis on the Horizon
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- What Effect Can Be Expected from Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis?
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Duodenal Atresia and Stenosis
- Pregnancy and Delivery in Type II Hereditary Antithrombin Deficient Patients
- Feedings of Critical Care Patients by Endoscopic Three-luminal Tube – A Retrospective Analysis
- Rare Diagnosis of CD4⁺56⁺ Leukemia from Dendritic Cells Type DC2